Future patch of smtpd-chkuser + other requests

Ken, I'm thinking to upgrade my patch (smtpd-chkusr), but I'll start only when there will be a definitive stable version of 4.10 (or 5.0 ?). Now I'm starting to consider the changes I have to do. Apart the new functions for alias/forwards (but not mailing list), I have to modify the building

Re: [vchkpw] Invalid mailbox handling / bouncing bounce handling

At 30/08/2002 30/08/2002 -0400, Jan Knepper wrote: >Hi, this has probably been asked several times, but... > >It is possible to reject a SMTP connection for a mailbox that does not exists? Yes, the patch is at www.interazioni.it/qmail, specifically made for vpopmail. This patch rejects SMTP conn

RE: [vchkpw] Smtp-auth

John, as long as I see in your attached lines, you didn't write correctly the host name following qmail-smtpd. You wrote > > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \ > > qmail.cyberbytesbbs.com/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /bin/true 2>&1 It should be /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \ qmail.cyberbytesbbs.com/

Re: [vchkpw] Catch-all and bounce

Check the patch at http://www.interazioni.it/qmail. It checks if a domain has bounce enabled, then reject connections for not existing users. So you can do you what you want, but on a whole domain. Tonino P.S. You may modify the patch to fit your needs. At 08/09/2002 08/09/2002 -0300, Feder

[vchkpw] Re: [qmailadmin] Re: Problem with qmailadmin-limits

002 09/09/2002 +0200, David Karlsen wrote: >tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > >Hi Nati, > >>>We have another test-server where limiting also failed(also a mandrake >>>8.2 installation). The error exist also on a third backup server(also >>>mandrake 8.2). The .qm

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail locking problem on NFS filesystem

Gonzalo, may you please turn off notification when you post to a list? Thanks, Tonino At 09/10/02 09/10/02 +0200, Gonzalo G. Agulló wrote: >Hi, > >I'm trying to share maildir directories with NFS from a backend file >server to distribute load on a couple frontend pop/smtp boxes. In my first

Re: [vchkpw] undeliverable mail

See http://www.interazioni.it/qmail At 11/10/02 11/10/02 +0500, zafar wrote: hello all     i wan to know how a user get bounced mail when not recipient exist At that time mail is go to the qmail postmaster maildir. anything possible for that which user send invalid recipient ,it rebou

[vchkpw] Bug (feature) in MySQL select

I've received a message for "user @mydomain.it", and vpopmail routine validating addresses has let this wrong address pass. I've found that when you make a SELECT * FROM VPOPMAIL WHERE pw_name = "user " it's exactly like SELECT * FROM VPOPMAIL WHERE pw_name = "user" This is a

Re: [vchkpw] patch for vpopmail 5.3.8 for .qmailadmin-limits

At 23/10/02 23/10/02 -0700, Bill Shupp wrote: On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 12:55 AM, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: 2) I'ld like to have other options in qmailadmin-limits, that could permit to deny some functions to 'admin' users that are not 'postmaster':

Re: [vchkpw] patch for vpopmail 5.3.8 for .qmailadmin-limits

At 23/10/02 23/10/02 -0700, Bill Shupp wrote: On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 12:55 AM, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: As usual, I don't see anything related to "disablesmtp". Is this feature going to be merged in the main stream, or do I have to continue with my private c

Re: [vchkpw] many-domains=n large-site=y courier-imap problem

As far as I remember, many-domains=n and many-domains=y work with different tables. So, when switching from "n" to "y" you should also convert the database to the new format. This is one of the switches you select with the first installation, and then you never change (usually). Tonino At 1

RE: [vchkpw] multi-table mysql domains

I feel the reason of having multidomains=n is related to the possibility to have a very few domains (usually one) with a lot of mailboxes (hundreds of thousands). In such a case you save a lot of space on tables + indexes, semplify accesses to simpler indexes. Two or three years ago, all that s

Re: [vchkpw] patch for vpopmail 5.3.8 for .qmailadmin-limits

As usual, I don't see anything related to "disablesmtp". Is this feature going to be merged in the main stream, or do I have to continue with my private copies? Anyway, two notes: 1) I feel that would be much better another layout, like: domain CHAR(64) PRIMARY KEY, option CH

Re: [vchkpw] Re: smtp-auth

Probably you use OpenSSL 0.9.6e, at least, and Eudora has problems talking TLS with new versions of OpenSSL (it talks with 0.9.6c, that has security holes). You must add this (+) line in qmail-smtpd.c: void smtp_tls(arg) char *arg; { SSL_C

[vchkpw] Problem with smtp auth and Eudora

I've problems with Eudora, trying to send a message using an account which has SMTP flag disabled (just testing the feature). Eudora hangs (indipendently of tls usage), and the qmail-smtpd process hangs the same. When I stop Eudora sending, also qmail-smtpd stops. When I try to recreate the sa

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + Vpopmail + patches

Hi Anton, I wrote the first patch you speak about (qmail-smtpd-chksr), and seen no problem with all the other patches I've installed until now (including TLS and AUTH). My suggestion. First, install all other pathes, except mine, and be sure they work. Second, be sure the installed patches do

RE: [vchkpw] disk quota per domain

I'm thinking to a new solution, modifying qmailadmin as follows. A unique ".qmailmaildirsize" should be created in the domain, and every user should have his own "maildirsize" linked by an "ln -sf" to the domain's ".qmailmaildirsize". \domain \domain\.qmailmaildirsize [global]

RE: [vchkpw] disk quota per domain

is using whereas your solution will not. What do you say Ken/Bill ? Regards, Lu > -Original Message- > From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [vchkpw] disk

[vchkpw] Re: feature request qmail-smtpd-chkusr

Hi Eduardo, my patch basically modifies qmail-smtpd.c code, using vpopmail libraries. So, it may be seen practically in the category "qmail patch", not "vpopmail patch". As any patch, it may not work if someone applied other patches before, so I don't think it may be right to include it in vpo

Re: [vchkpw] Re: feature request qmail-smtpd-chkusr

Hi Brian, the versions you see on my website are tailored for vpopmail, so they handle every kind of user vpopmail handles, valias and .qmail aliases, ezmlm mailing lists. It may be easily customized for other handlers. A lot of people asked me, and they realized the same control out of vpopma

Re: [vchkpw] non existent users

At 16/02/03 16/02/03 +0100, admin wrote: Hi, I am using vpopmail and it is working very wekk for me. I the FAQ I found the next question: I don't want to bounce emails for non existent users. Instead I want to delete them, how? and also the answer. But I will not to delete this ma

Re: [vchkpw] Quotas

Hi Rick, it's a small bug in the quota patch of last "official" qmailadmin versions(I did not suppose Inter7 integrate patches without trying them, but that happens sometimes). diff -u qmailadmin-1.0.10/util.c qmailadmin-1.0.10-pooled2/util.c --- qmailadmin-1.0.10/util.cFri Jan 24 23:25:31 20

Re: [vchkpw] Quotas

ic auto-correction when quota is less than zero. Tonino At 04/03/03 04/03/03 +0100, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Hi Rick, it's a small bug in the quota patch of last "official" qmailadmin versions(I did not suppose Inter7 integrate patches without trying them, but that happens sometim

Re: [vchkpw] qmail-smtpd patch

Abdul, the patch you're looking for is at: www.interazioni.it/qmail It's been deeply proved and installed by hundreds of people. There are two versions: one completely compliant to qmail security model, the other semplified in order to work with TLS. Ciao, Tonino At 12/03/03 12/03/03 +0200,

Re: [vchkpw] Domain quotas

Please correct me if I'm wrong... As far as I understand, the domain quota code included in the last development version of vpopmail is NOT 100% compatible with other programs like sqwebmail, courier, ecc., so you may have some disalignments, depending on the products you're using. Tonino At

Re: [vchkpw] Domain quotas

Brian, when you store a message inside an imap server (like when using squirrelmail & courier, and keeping your outgoing message in the "Sent" folder), or when using sqwebmail just keep it in the "Sent" or upload an attach, which quota computing is done: courier, sqwebmail or vpopmail? I think

Re: [vchkpw] Domain quotas

At 26/03/03 26/03/03 -0500, Brian Kolaci wrote: When a message arrives and is delivered by vdelivermail, the quotas are enforced. It also updates the maildirsize file (and uses the maildir++ naming conventions) thereby updating the maildir++ quota usage that is shared amongst all maildir++ compat

Re: [vchkpw] Domain quotas

At 26/03/03 26/03/03 -0500, Brian Kolaci wrote: > >When a message arrives and is delivered by vdelivermail, > >the quotas are enforced. It also updates the maildirsize > >file (and uses the maildir++ naming conventions) thereby > >updating the maildir++ quota usage that is shared amongst

Re: [vchkpw] Domain quotas

At 26/03/03 26/03/03 -0500, you wrote: > >I don't believe the "Sent" folder keeps track of any size. > >I looked and don't see any "maildirsize" files in "Sent" folders. > >So it doesn't look like it counts against either user or domain > >quotas. You'll have to take a look at the spec to

Re: [vchkpw] When I updated user's quota, maildirsize file is not with correct quota

How did you change quota? Tonino At 27/03/03 27/03/03 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example: A user's quota is 1M, and some mails are in its Inbox, and I was checked its directory, the maildirsize file is there. When I changed this user's quota to 3M, after a mail come in, the quota's t

Re: [vchkpw] qmail-smtpd check for valid user/over quota with vpopmail api

Hi Ken, why are you ignoring my patch at www.interazioni.it/qmail? You know it exists and works, so I don't understand why you continue to ignore it and prefer to post a rough (and poor) one. Tonino At 05/04/03 05/04/03 -0600, Ken Jones wrote: I read on the qmail list last week that someone sw

Re: [vchkpw] qmail-smtpd-chkusr Patch Problem

Tom, I suppose you're using the "regular" version, as you speak of setuid. You have to read carefully instructions at www.interazioni.it/qmail. These are the instructions for the regular version: "regular" qmail-smtpd-chkusr must be installed (by default in /var/qmail/bin) with setuid (user qmail

Re: [vchkpw] chkusr patch

Hi David, this is my Makefile: qmail-smtpd: \ load qmail-smtpd.o rcpthosts.o commands.o timeoutread.o \ timeoutwrite.o ip.o ipme.o ipalloc.o control.o constmap.o received.o \ date822fmt.o now.o qmail.o cdb.a fd.a wait.a datetime.a getln.a \ ope

Re: dbfunctions - it's over

Sorry, but I don't agree. I don't know your product, Krzysztof, and I suppose your coding to be excellent, but I feel your vision is very close to your needs only. At 28/05/2001 28/05/2001 +0200, Krzysztof Dabrowski wrote: >>You can check the archives for the exact posting (subject Dbfunctions

Re: dbfunctions - it's over

Krzysztof, now is you, but it could be your fault. Only for my curiosity, did you ask Ken, before writing, how could you be useful in order to extend vpopmail functionalities while remaining integrated with all the rest? Did he give you any rule to follow? About your documentation, I visited

Re: dbfunctions - it's over

Thanks for your reply. At 29/05/2001 29/05/2001 +0200, Krzysztof Dabrowski wrote: >>Only for my curiosity, did you ask Ken, before writing, how could you be >>useful in order to extend vpopmail functionalities while remaining >>integrated with all the rest? Did he give you any rule to follow?

Re: smtp-auth / vpopmail

I want to do that, and in the future I'll extend my patch (checkusers on qmail-smtpd) or write a new one, but I've not studied actual patches nor I've time to do it in near future. Tonino At 31/05/2001 31/05/2001 +0100, Kieran Barnes wrote: >Does anybody have any implementation of, or plans t

Re: User over quota message

I feel it could be solved only patching pop3d demon, letting him generate a first fake messages when user mailbox has exceeded (or it's going to do) its quota. So it doesn't waste space, it's always delivered, etc. But, before this patch, I would like to find an unique centralized way to store

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

Roberto ha scritto: Hi James, what version of netqmail are you using? does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06? Roberto James Cox ha scritto: I've had it running for a few hours, and have this: 1 CHKUSER rejected relaying 5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt 28 CHKUSER r

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

James Cox ha scritto: On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Roberto ha scritto: Hi James, what version of netqmail are you using? does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06? Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output. In the past other people

Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems

Brian Lanier ha scritto: - Original Message - *From:* James Cox *To:* vchkpw@inter7.com *Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM *Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems I just did a fresh install of toa

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser random rejects

Bogdan Motoc - CRC ha scritto: This most probably is not a vpopmail problem, but a chkuser one. The support page of chkuser (http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/support/mailing_lists.html) points to this mailing list, so that's why I'm posting this here. chkuser is simply using basic

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser random rejects

Bogdan Motoc - CRC ha scritto: Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Bogdan Motoc - CRC ha scritto: This most probably is not a vpopmail problem, but a chkuser one. The support page of chkuser (http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/support/mailing_lists.html) points to this mailing list, so

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser random rejects

e: I seem to have broken things really bad. I tried to make mail.domain.tld an alias of domain.tld Now authentication only works from time to time. The bounce says: <mailto:u...@domain.tld>: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Of course, that account exists. Where are domai

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser random rejects

-07-20 15:16 sqwebmail-timestamp drwx-- 2 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 2008-11-01 09:17 tmp Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Which are ownership and privileges of domain directories and mailboxes? chkuser simply checks mysql or cdb, while qmail in delivery checks also for directories. Tonino Tren

Re: [vchkpw] Patch to disable vusaged

Simone Lazzaris ha scritto: In data giovedì 03 settembre 2009 hai scritto: Simone Lazzaris wrote: Our setup is spreaded on many servers (think 20), with the mail stored on an NFS share (NetApp). The vusage daemon is written with this in mind, though it's more efficient to have i

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser and mailbox quotas

DAve ha scritto: Good morning, We have, for a long time now, successfully used MailScanner on our gateway servers and then routing clean mail to our pop toasters. The pop toasters are running netqmail, vpopmail 5-4-17, and chkuser 2.0.8. I am having an issue where users are going overquota

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser log mesage, remote

Eric Shubert ha scritto: I use qmail-toaster, and recently changed from using -H with tcpserver to using -h, which looks up the rDNS name and puts it in the TCPREMOTEHOST variable. With the former setup (-H), the remote portion of the CHKUSER log message contained the helo value, "unknown" fo

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser parameters via tcp.smtp environment variables

Eric Shubert ha scritto: Tonino, I've wondered for a while about this but haven't had a chance to test it, so I'm going to ask the expert. ;) If /* #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_3 '' */ is commented out of the build, can it be added as an environment variable such as CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDE

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser parameters via tcp.smtp environment variables

Eric Shubert ha scritto: Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Eric Shubert ha scritto: Tonino, I've wondered for a while about this but haven't had a chance to test it, so I'm going to ask the expert. ;) If /* #define CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_3 '' */ is commented out of t

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser parameters via tcp.smtp environment variables

Eric Shubert ha scritto: I agree with this as well, for the most part. This is why I think that the option(s) would be better suited as CHKUSER_DISALLOW. IOW, start with things wide open, and let admins specify which characters they choose not to allow. I did not consider it this way. It is

Re: [vchkpw] Re: disable-many-domains -> enable-many-domains

Eric Shubert ha scritto: Thibault Richard wrote: Hello, I'm using vpopmail since a few years with the compilation option "--disable-many-domains" (for historical reason because I followed Qmailrocks guide for my first installation). If I've well understand, one one the difference between th

Re: [vchkpw] vmysql: sql error[3]: MySQL server has gone away

Joe Littleton ha scritto: I have searched for two days trying to figure out why I keep getting this error. I am using vpopmail 5.4.30 and mysql 5.0.77-4 on CentOS 5.4 I can reproduce the error by restarting the mysql server. The only way to make it work after restarting mysql is to also r

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser to exit immediately

Hi Nick, actually, chkuser can do just that, for a well tought (I hope) reason: when an intruder tries your addresses, it is important to deny informations to him; if we drop connection, he will restart and next two attempts (thinking to your limit=2) will have a true answer... In this way, a

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

Il 09/09/2010 11:50, Julien Escario ha scritto: Hello, I'm managing an email server that recently started to refuse inbound mail to a few domains. I checked almost everything and the declaration seems to be exactly the same for others domains. For example : : 195.200.217.34 does not like r

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

Il 09/09/2010 15:26, Julien Escario ha scritto: Le 09/09/2010 13:45, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : Il 09/09/2010 11:50, Julien Escario ha scritto: Did you make ANY change in software recently? No. The server only rebooted but some times ago ... What does say your virtualdomains

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

Il 09/09/2010 16:16, Julien Escario ha scritto: Le 09/09/2010 15:46, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : Il 09/09/2010 15:26, Julien Escario ha scritto: Le 09/09/2010 13:45, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : Il 09/09/2010 11:50, Julien Escario ha scritto: You could setup a version of qmail-smtpd

Re: [vchkpw] submission port 587

Il 12/09/2010 01:39, jeffk...@intersessions.com ha scritto: This may be the wrong forum for this but I can't seem to find any info. Does anyone have information on how to setup a second SMTP process within qmail that listens on port 587 and accepts ONLY authenticated smtp connections? In thi

Re: [vchkpw] Re: chkuser - rejects legit mail, when followed by bad e-mail

Il 08/10/2010 18:23, Rick Romero ha scritto: Quoting "Matt Brookings" : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/08/2010 11:05 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: U. George wrote: It is not clear to me if the same message is sent to multiple users, or multiple messages to multiple users usin

[vchkpw] Error in punycode (xn-- domains) handling by chkuser

Actually chkuser handles xn-- domains, but in the wrong way (it does not consider more levels of xn-- names, like xn-subdomain.xn--domain.com). To eliminate any problem, with current version, installations should be modified in this way: Or disable/comment in chkuser_settings.h #define C

Re: [vchkpw] qmail aliases fail; chkuser 2.0.9 + vpopmail 5.4.25

aliases are .qmail-aliasname files. "matt-foo" is not an alias. It is an extension of name "matt". For enabling extensions you must enable (uncomment) CHKUSER_ENABLE_USERS_EXTENSIONS For enabling ezmlm lists, you must enable (uncomment) CHKUSER_ENABLE_EZMLM_LISTS. See http://www.interazioni

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP authentication not work

You sould find in maillog the reason of failure. Regards, Tonino Il 05/05/2011 10:05, OVH ha scritto: Hi, Since few days I try smtp-auth and chkuser on qmail 1.03. I managed to apply the patch manually, when tested sending smtp-auth it never authenticate using vpopmail. In my config I have

Re: [vchkpw] Re: [SPAM] Qmail TAP not working

Il 01/03/2012 17:32, Eric Shubert ha scritto: I don't know for sure, but I can hazard a guess. You see, tap works on both sender and recipient addresses. More like sender *or* recipient addresses. Since the email is send from pqr, that tap is matched and no others are tried (apparently). Someo

Re: [vchkpw] New server

chkuser does not check for local users when domain is defined into locals. In such a case it simply accept any recipient for local domains. Reason is simple. For checking local domains users it should have root privileges, which is not wanted for a lot of reasons. I suggest to abandon any loca

Re: [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Rrdirection problem

Stéphane, try in this way: * delete the forward ss...@piemont.fr * create one normal account ss...@piemont.fr * insert within this account a forward to spa...@piemont.fr In this way it should work. Tonino Il 24/04/2014 19:45, Eric Shubert ha scritto: That could very well be, Tom. Stépha

Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Password strength bug

Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto: In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as when -e is used to add the encrypted password). Patch attached. I do not understand the problem. Of course pa

Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Password strength bug

Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto: On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto: In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as when -e is us

Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Password strength bug

Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto: On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto: On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto: In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c

Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Password strength bug

Il 21/09/2015 14:59, Drew Wells ha scritto: On 09/17/2015 12:28 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto: On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto: On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il

Re: [vchkpw] Catch all domain account

At 04/07/03 04/07/03 +0200, Peter Palmreuther wrote: Hi Kiril, On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 21:24:20 +0300 Kiril Todorov wrote: >> How can I get the bounced mail from each domain delivered to the >> Postmaster of the coresponding domain instead of having all the bounced >> mail delivered to me? > > that's

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser patch

Hi Rick, read carefully the running instructions on my page at www.interazioni.it/qmail. You must not use SUID and GUID bits on qmail-smtpd with the "Easy-version", but must run it directly as vpopmail root from tcpserver (or root if you have different users for different domains), and all will

Re: [vchkpw] RE : [vchkpw] Deny on bad username?

Use Bill's version if you're using his MegaPatch. Otherwise, look at the reference page for chkuser at www.interazioni.it/qmail. The unique difference (at the moment) is that Bill solves a bug of auth patch modifying chkuser, while in the reference page of chkusr it is indicated how to eliminat

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP is too slow

Did you add "-H -l yourlocalname" to your tcpserver? It avoids consulting DNS for changing IP to names. When it looks for not existent names, or when yout DNS server is working bad, you have huge delays. If you have a private address as sender or receiver, no public DNS will be able to traslate

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and virusscanner

I'm using qmailscanner with NOD32. Fast, safe, cheap. Ciao, Tonino At 13/07/03 13/07/03 +0200, Bård Tommy Nilsen wrote: Hello   Have anyone set up a mail virus checker on a FreeBSD machine with Qmail and vpopmail ??   What did you use ??     Best Regards Bård Tommy Nilsen -

Re: [vchkpw] domain quotas query

On Saturday 19 July 2003 12:01, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: > >i now want to convert to domain quotas, wherein i give the domain a 'bulk' > >quota, then the customer can allocate individual user quotas within that > >total. but i'm a little confused about a couple of things: > > I already sent some

Re: [vchkpw] ISP Anti Virusscanner

Here we're using nod32 since more than one year, with excellent results. It's cheap and very fast. Tonino At 20/08/03 20/08/03 +0200, Widmer Hannes wrote: Hello List We are looking for a good antivirusscanner for a qmail system with qmailscanner. Does somebody can give me a tip for a good solut

Re: [vchkpw] courier pop3d

Courier pop3d is run directly by courier, as a daemon, and (as long as I know) cannot be run using tcpserver. Read courier documentation. You'll find an initial courier command file that must be run at startup time (I have /mypath/courier-imap-1.5.1/libexec/pop3d.rc start as my starting

Re: [vchkpw] courier pop3d

It's not question of being stupid or smart, just what you like and feel useful. Anyway, I'm running all the qmail stuff since two years (courier a little bit lesser) without supervise, and I never had a problem. I've examined the supervise architecture, and I don't like it. Unique problems on M

Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.26 error with chkusr patch + mysql

Shane, I did not try the last versions of vpopmail. It looks like function vget_real_domain does not exists anymore. Try commenting out these lines of code, and please let me know. /* Check if domain is a real domain */ /* if (!stralloc_0 (&domain)) die_nomem(); vget_real_domain

Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.26 error with chkusr patch + mysql

I thought of this initially, but then I forgot because of the general gain this patch gives. We could introduce a delay for each not existing user, or a limit for the maximum number of "rcpt to". But for a massive hacker, that could not be a problem. I'm thinking of a more sophisticated code, bu

Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.26 error with chkusr patch + mysql

Just another thought. What is done through the ckuser patch, is what all other e-mail systems (escluding native qmail) all do usually. So, this is a general problem for all e-mail systems. Ciao, Tonino At 01/09/03 01/09/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just thinking out loud. The approa

Re: [vchkpw] disable pop before smtp feature in vpopmail

If I'm not in confusion, you could just enable (for all users) the flag related to NORELAY, and put the line disabling this feature into the limits file (I don't know anymore where this file is). Ciao, Tonino At 04/09/03 04/09/03 +0200, Riccardo Gori wrote: Hi all, I am trying to disable th

Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.26 error with chkusr patch + mysql

wn to vget_real_domain calling ChangeLog: the vget_real_domain() function to change the domain vpopmail.h:int vget_real_domain(char *domain, int len ); Looks like the function is gone... Charles On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > Shane, > > I did not try the last versio

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Tom's fork of vpopmail (and qmailadmin)

At 09/09/03 09/09/03 -0700, Tom Collins wrote: Ken Jones hasn't contributed to vpopmail and qmailadmin development since March. We've had 12 qmailadmin releases and 7 vpopmail releases since then. Managing the projects on SourceForge keeps everything out in the open, and allows anyone to cont

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Tom's fork of vpopmail (and qmailadmin)

My 2 cents. I'm not satisfied both with the last year of Inter7 and the SF period. I've seen a lot of changes done, but I've the strong feeling that there is no coherence in the architecture of vpopmail, anymore. Too much programmers at work, no analists. No "-enable" on configuration for new

RE: [vchkpw] more SMTP relay problem

The copy indicated does not solve correctly a bug of TLS. Check the original at www.interazioni.it/qmail. Tonino At 16/09/03 16/09/03 +0800, Shane Chrisp wrote: Check out the checkusr patch. There is a copy on http://shupp.org Shane >-Original Message- >From: gabi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [vchkpw] any thoughts on use of chkusr patch with tmda?

This topic should have been already covered. Please check if this "change" works for you. Ciao, Tonino - In such a case, I may suggest a very general and "to be adjiusted manually" patch "over the patch" like this.

Re: [vchkpw] any thoughts on use of chkusr patch with tmda?

At 18/09/03 18/09/03 -0400, Vinnie wrote: If I'm understanding this correctly (and definitely may not be, since I'm just getting started messing around with TMDA), what this would do is cause qmail-smtpd to: 1. look for an exact match of the recipient first - if an exact match is found, hand of

Re: [vchkpw] any thoughts on use of chkusr patch with tmda?

Hi Vince, it looks like I'm continuosly using the wrong call, in these patch over patch sequences. Probably I should have used "byte_chr" (look starting from left) instead of "byte_rchr" (look starting from right). Sorry. May you please confirm me if using the "byte_chr" call solves all probl

[vchkpw] Bugs solved for chkuser and TMDA

Thanks to some warnings I received (thanks Vince), I've modified and tested the "patch over patch" made for making chkuser work together with TMDA, and made a final version that looks exempt from bugs (!). Note: The original chkuser has no problems. Problems have been found on the extension made

Re: [vchkpw] Outlook unable to relay, Kmail can...

Are Linux clients relaying using your SMTP box, or are they sending by themselves? Tonino At 01/10/03 01/10/03 +, David Benson wrote: Eric, thanks for the suggestion, but that was not the solution... I will be reviewing the site you recommended to see if I can find a clue as to what this co

Re: [vchkpw] Outlook unable to relay, Kmail can...

on of using recordio to see what is being sent, maybe that will turn up some clues... On Wednesday 01 October 2003 02:31, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > Are Linux clients relaying using your SMTP box, or are they sending by > themselves? > > Tonino > > At 01/10/03 01/10/03 +, D

Re: [vchkpw] disable_external_relay

No,it works only for pop-before-SMTP. I suggested to use it also for SMTP relay, but it wqas preferred to add a dedicated bit for SMTP relaying. So, you may also disable SMTP relay, but I don't know if you find the disable_smtp line working in the last vpopmail versions. I made the patch for ma

Re: [vchkpw] disable_external_relay

Devendra, 1) did you set this flag up? 2) Are you sure you are not an open relay? Tonino At 02/12/2003 02/12/2003 +0530, you wrote: At 24/11/03 21:46 (), Tom Collins wrote: On Monday, November 24, 2003, at 03:37 AM, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: No,it works only for pop-before-SMTP. I suggested

Re: [vchkpw] disable_external_relay

: 41943040 disable_smtp 2. It's not a Open Relay Server. Checked with http://members.iinet.net.au/~remmie/relay/ and with http://spamlart.homeunix.org/ (Server referenced above is a test Server) Devendra Singh At 02/12/03 20:35 (), tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Devendra, 1) did you set thi

Re: [vchkpw] disable_external_relay [PATCH]

Tom, sorry if I may be out of logic, just a fast look at the patch. Is it correct to keep using user flags if override is off? +if ((! (pw->pw_gid & V_OVERRIDE)) if user not overriding domain limits + && (vget_limits (domain, &limits) == 0)) { +pw->pw_flags = pw->pw_gid | vlimi

Re: [vchkpw] disable_external_relay [PATCH]

rs. Ciao, Tonino At 03/12/2003 03/12/2003 -0700, you wrote: On Wednesday, December 3, 2003, at 10:05 AM, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Tom, sorry if I may be out of logic, just a fast look at the patch. Here's how it works. pw_gid is the user's limits. if the user has V_OVERRIDE s

Re: [vchkpw] disable_external_relay [PATCH]

2003 +0530, Devendra Singh wrote: Dear Tonino / Tom, In between the whole expert discussion the user level curious question "BTW, where is this user's limits info stored in case of non-mysql limits?" got lost. Please, let us know. Devendra Singh At 04/12/03 14:32 (), tonix (Antonio N

Re: [vchkpw] disable_external_relay [PATCH]

n-limits", it still allowed to relay the users. When I did use the vmoduser to set the disable_smtp flag, it worked. But, where did the vmoduser store this flag info. I could not locate it. May some expert out there listening, may guide us. Devendra Singh At 05/12/03 13:48 (), tonix (Anton

Re: [vchkpw] checkuser patch

Can you explain better what are you trying to do? How the "patched qmail-smtpd" is run? Have both servers the same domains declared and the same "users data base"? Tonino At 14/01/2004 14/01/2004 -0500, Jeff Koch wrote: We trying to setup a Smart Host mail router but kludge the checkuser patch

  1   2   3   4   >