Hi,
thi is slightly offtopic of course, but:
can i bounce only the headers of a rejected message? Right now
qmail+vpopmail bounces the whole thing. It seems kinda pointless to
bounce several megabytes of mail jus to say "the user ... is over quota"
cheers.
Kristofer
On 3/3/2005 1:58 PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
thi is slightly offtopic of course, but:
can i bounce only the headers of a rejected message? Right now
qmail+vpopmail bounces the whole thing. It seems kinda pointless to
bounce several megabytes of mail jus to say "the user ... is over quo
> > > > I don't think vdelivermail or vpopmail in general should be
calling
> > > > spamc/spamassassin. Let that be handled elsewhere. Let's stick
to
> > > > delivering mail and deciding where it goes.
> > >
> > > However, lets remember that if spam is only scanned at the MTA
level,
> > > SpamAss
> "Charles J. Boening" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said
> So let me see if I can summarize where this might be going. A lot has
> been talked about on this topic.
>
> Use the pw_uid/pw_gid to check and see if a user wants their mail
> filtered. I'd also suggest setting another bit for delivery. So we'd
On Thursday 03 March 2005 08:59 am, Nick Harring wrote:
> > > > > I don't think vdelivermail or vpopmail in general should be
>
> calling
>
> > > > > spamc/spamassassin. Let that be handled elsewhere. Let's stick
>
> to
>
> > > > > delivering mail and deciding where it goes.
> > > >
> > > > Howev
>> This would handle both
>> the problem of if the user wants their mail scanned and the disposition
>> of the scanned mail.
> Yep.
If using SQL settings for Spamassassin, the user could also whitelist all
senders to avoid spam processing.
>> I also think spamc options should
>> be stored in the
> >
> > Simscan isn't replacing qmail-smtpd, so this isn't strictly an smtp
> > limitation. Perhaps I'm just not getting it, but why wouldn't the
> > following work:
> > Email comes in for users A, B and C. A and B have an SA threshold of
5,
> > C has a threshold of 9. The message scores at 7. Dele
Ken Jones wrote:
"Charles J. Boening" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said
I also think spamc options should
be stored in the same place.
Currently the spamc options can be set on the configure line.
We thought that would be a good place since the spamc options
are site wide. I think all the user prefere
> > vdelivermail would call spamc.
> > Personally, I don't think we should offer the ability to call
> > Spamassassin directly. It's just not as efficient.
> I think when people talked about calling spamassassin they
> meant calling spamc to talk to spamassassin. At least, that's
> how the deve
Dave Goodrich wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
"Charles J. Boening" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said
I also think spamc options should be stored in the same place.
Currently the spamc options can be set on the configure line.
We thought that would be a good place since the spamc options
are site wide. I thin
On Thursday 03 March 2005 10:54 am, Nick Harring wrote:
> I attempted to use the archive of the simscan list, and found one
> discussion which ended with the abrupt declaration from you that it
> couldn't be done. Perhaps you could point me at a thread where there's
> real discussion of this?
I wi
http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?domain0=64.119.194.44;bl0=0
Snipped from my spamassassin report. I found a message from Jeremy
Kitchen my spam folder.
Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 4.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
---
Hello:
After years of using vpopmail I feel this question a bit stupid, but there
should be a better way to do it.
I have configured vpopmail to use only virtual accounts.
How do I do to get internal local mail in the operators accounts? Or I can
redirect those mails (comming usually from interna
On Mar 3, 2005, at 8:54 AM, Nick Harring wrote:
No, it wouldn't require this. It would require that you edit the
recipient list prior to queueing. There's nothing 'ugly' that I can see
about that process.
I think Nick's method would work for those who want to block anything
that scores as spam but
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?domain0=64.119.194.44;bl0=0
>
> Snipped from my spamassassin report. I found a message from Jeremy
> Kitchen my spam folder.
[snip]
That's not inter7's IP, at least not the one the list comes from. My
headers from your message show inter7 sent their
On Thursday 03 March 2005 11:57 am, Dave Goodrich wrote:
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?domain0=64.119.194.44;bl0=0
>
> Snipped from my spamassassin report. I found a message from Jeremy
> Kitchen my spam folder.
>
> Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 4.0 required)
>
> pts
Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
Hello:
After years of using vpopmail I feel this question a bit stupid, but there
should be a better way to do it.
I have configured vpopmail to use only virtual accounts.
How do I do to get internal local mail in the operators accounts? Or I can
redirect those mails
> How many messages come into a server for multiple recipients in the
> same domain? I guess if someone was mailing multiple people at the
> same company, it would happen. But with most mailing lists using
> custom bounce messages for each recipient, they wouldn't be affected.
>
> How about the
On Mar 3, 2005, at 2:20 PM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
I have several scripts that output data from my mail servers and I
just add a .qmail-? file to /var/qmail/alias.
I had an odd situation where this wasn't working for the output of some
cron jobs.
Instead of a .qmail-fred in ~alias, I had to put th
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Nov 23, 2004, at 11:01 AM, David Hubbard wrote:
> > In a vpopmail 5.4.6 site with autoresponder 2.0.4,
> > the behavior we're seeing is that when a user
> > sets a vacation message, vpopmail sets up the autoresponder
> >
Hi,
It seems that if a user has a forward and a copy to self in his .qmail
file as Qmailadmin makes it, he will get no warning on 90% full and the
mail bypasses quota. It is delivered nicely in his mailbox.
I can bounce the message with CHKUSER though (CHKUSER_MBXQUOTA).
My vpopmail is 5.4.8
Can
All i have found, is a way to trim the bounces at certain number of
bytes. It would make much more sense to bounce only headers.
If i put the limit in bytes, say 2048, it is theoretically possible that
headers are longer than that. And if they are less, the bounce includes
an arbitrary number o
Bill Wichers wrote:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?domain0=64.119.194.44;bl0=0
Snipped from my spamassassin report. I found a message from Jeremy
Kitchen my spam folder.
[snip]
That's not inter7's IP, at least not the one the list comes from. My
headers from your message show inter7
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 03 March 2005 11:57 am, Dave Goodrich wrote:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?domain0=64.119.194.44;bl0=0
Snipped from my spamassassin report. I found a message from Jeremy
Kitchen my spam folder.
Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 4.0 required)
On Mar 3, 2005, at 7:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that if a user has a forward and a copy to self in his .qmail
file as Qmailadmin makes it, he will get no warning on 90% full and
the mail bypasses quota. It is delivered nicely in his mailbox.
I can bounce the message with CHKUSER th
Hi Kristofer
I am using spamcontrol
http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/spamcontrol.html
It is ver powerfull collection patches.
It has a bounce control very customizable and work with vpopmail.
On Thursday 03 March 2005 07:58 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thi is slightly offtopic of course, bu
26 matches
Mail list logo
