Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

Hello blist, Friday, May 21, 2004, 2:00:08 AM, you wrote: b> I am installing vchkpw + SMTP AUTH + qmail. I have installed qmail with b> this patch: b>qmail-smtpd-auth-0.31 from b> http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/ b> Here is my run tcpserver script for qmail-smtpd: b>

[vchkpw] vpopmail

Hello does the vpopmail user require a valid shell in /etc/passwd ? Radu

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail

Radu Spineanu wrote: Hello does the vpopmail user require a valid shell in /etc/passwd ? Only when you need to login for testing. For day to day operation /bin/true or something similar will work fine. Rick

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

On Friday, May 21, 2004 5:41 AM, DEBO Jurgen E. G. wrote: > In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS > security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your > e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet. Are you insinuating that this is

Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

Hello Jeremy, Friday, May 21, 2004, 3:47:18 PM, you wrote: JK> On Friday, May 21, 2004 5:41 AM, DEBO Jurgen E. G. wrote: >> In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS >> security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your >> e-mailadress and Your password

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

Hi, At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote: >Hello blist, > >In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS >security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your >e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet. >When a man-in-the-middle catch thi

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

On Thursday 20 May 2004 09:24 pm, Brooks Roy wrote: > I have put in the patch as described in the contrib README and changed > it to be /bin/checkpassword instead of vchkpw and I still have the same > senario. /bin/checkpassword generally needs to be run as root to authenticate users. More than

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

On Friday 21 May 2004 09:11 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS > >> security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your > >> e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet. > JKister> Are you insin

Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

Hello Erwin, Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote: EH> Hi, EH> At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote: >>Hello blist, >> >>In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS >>security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your >>e-mailadress and Your passwo

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

On Friday 21 May 2004 10:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > EH> This is only true for SMTP Authentication of type "plain" and "login". > EH> With CRAM-MD5 its quite save. > Yes, it's 'quite' safe, but You still reveal Your e-mailadress. > If there are many hops between Your workstation and the smtp

Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

Hello Jeremy, Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:20:40 PM, you wrote: JK> On Friday 21 May 2004 10:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> EH> This is only true for SMTP Authentication of type "plain" and "login". >> EH> With CRAM-MD5 its quite save. >> Yes, it's 'quite' safe, but You still reveal Your e-mailad

Re: Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

Hi, At 17:21 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote: >Hello Erwin, > >Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote: > >EH> Hi, > >EH> At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote: >>>Hello blist, >>> > >>>In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS >>>security as SMTP after POP, because with SM

RE: [vchkpw] vpopmail

If you're using maildrop it does. Or at least, mine did. -Original Message- From: Rick Widmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 3:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail Radu Spineanu wrote: > Hello > > does the vpopmail user require a valid sh

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

Title: Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hello Jeremy, > >Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:20:40 PM, you wrote: > >JK> On Friday 21 May 2004 10:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >  > >>>EH> This is only true for SMTP Authentication of type "plain" and "login". >>>EH> With CRAM-

Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

Hello Nick, Friday, May 21, 2004, 8:02:19 PM, you wrote: NH> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>Hello Jeremy, >> >>Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:20:40 PM, you wrote: >> >>JK> On Friday 21 May 2004 10:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>  >> EH> This is only true for SMTP Authentication of type "plain" and

Re[4]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

Hello Erwin, Friday, May 21, 2004, 7:37:15 PM, you wrote: EH> Hi, EH> At 17:21 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote: >>Hello Erwin, >> >>Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote: >> >>EH> Hi, >> >>EH> At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote: Hello blist, >> In the OLD days, people were happy wit

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Erwin, Friday, May 21, 2004, 7:37:15 PM, you wrote: EH> Hi, EH> At 17:21 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote: Hello Erwin, Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote: EH> Hi, EH> At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:

Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

Hello Patrick, Friday, May 21, 2004, 9:34:30 PM, you wrote: PD> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PD> Hello Erwin, PD> Friday, May 21, 2004, 7:37:15 PM, you wrote: EH>> Hi, EH>> At 17:21 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote: PD> Hello Erwin, PD> Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote: EH>> Hi

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

PD> Ahhh...yes! A flame war...always nice :) I quote from the one who has bringing 'the gas': EH> You are joking, troll Well, I did't start. This list is to help people. It's not about to be picky or to be arrogant, if someone share another view, he has the right to put his vision forward and to

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brooks Roy wrote: > I do not have an open relay. I am trying to setup SMTP Auth. It is not > working.. When users try to auth, it just keeps asking for username > password over and over. Never sends. How are they authentication? with [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Clayton Weise wrote: > If you're using maildrop it does. Or at least, mine did. Seconded. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFArmMDJukONu5DUaQRAhvg

Re: Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

Title: Re: Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO? On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 14:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello Nick, > > Friday, May 21, 2004, 8:02:19 PM, you wrote: > > > NH> > > Privacy issues are hot topic, You known.  If You known, some > 'sensitive' data is often maintained with a single

Re[4]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?

Hello Nick, Friday, May 21, 2004, 10:13:29 PM, you wrote: NH> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NH> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NH> Received: (qmail 98433 invoked by uid 1017); 21 May 2004 20:24:45 - NH> Received: from venus.teleshop.name NH> by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5

[vchkpw] Authentication with vpopmail+mysql doesn't work

Hi list, I've been setting up a new mailserver for us in the last days and have been running into troubles. Just to mention: A quite similar installation (without mysql-support and some other patches) is already running for about one year. Everything is working fine except relaying mails with