On Friday 21 May 2004 09:11 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
> >> security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your
> >> e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet.
> JKister> Are you insinuating that this is not so with POP3 (or "SMTP after
POP")
> No not at all, were do You get this ?
you said it yourself.
> Maybe You read it Your way.
no, he read it as you wrote it.
> You can authenticate with POP3-SSL, and have a SMTP after POP, so were
> is Your point, in this case ?
you can also smtp auth over ssl
> What I insinuating was to use TLS for SMTP, and not SMTP Auth.
you said that later, but that wasn't your original statement.
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 847.492.0470 int'l
kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail
