Tom Collins wrote (at Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 02:28:36PM -0700):
> There's an open bug report for it on SourceForge now.
I suppose I should get used to using that thing... sorry.
> In the long run, the
> solution is to cache the information on the newly-added domain so
> vget_assign can pull from
On Sunday, December 14, 2003, at 06:44 AM, X-Istence wrote:
Submit a patch on sourceforge or put it on the list if possible, as
you know why the problem happens.
If not, let me know where to look exactly, and ill take a look.
There's an open bug report for it on SourceForge now.
It may have wor
X-Istence wrote (at Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:44:53AM -0500):
> Casey Zacek wrote:
>
> >'vadddomain -O' is broken in 5.4.0-pre1, and probably others.
> >
> >The problem is that vget_assign() looks in [/var/qmail/]users/cdb for
> >the domain, and it's not there yet for the vadduser(postmaster) call.
Casey Zacek wrote:
'vadddomain -O' is broken in 5.4.0-pre1, and probably others.
The problem is that vget_assign() looks in [/var/qmail/]users/cdb for
the domain, and it's not there yet for the vadduser(postmaster) call.
vsetuserquota(), after vadduser(), also uses vget_assign(), as does
vadddoma
