Hi,
My opinion, if it can help :
If it works when you have a .qmail, it's probably because this file use a
different delivery agent (maildrop), thus it means that your default delivery
agent does not work correctly, and for me according you are using gentoo,
honnestly, the .maildir / Maildir d
I tend to agree with you on all points, however, once a production level
system is up and running (quite smoothly for years up until recently here)
I try not to upset the chi.
Now if I were to do it all over, I'd probably do it very differently. It's
always a learning process.
Back onto point tho
> You do raise a good point, I wish Gentoo would get that part of it right.
> Deviating from the standards are not a good idea.
>
I love Gentoo, but every now and then the do something boneheaded that
makes me think that I should bail on it for KUbuntu or something like
that. The only thing that's
I do agree, that the ebuilds are not always very useful. I had edited the
build to eliminate the changes from Maildir to .maildir. It is
accomplished through a simple sed command across the vpopmail source
before compiling.
I interrupted this process by commenting it out and the build itself
shoul
Hi,
Be carefull with the Gentoo ebuilds : they are modyfied by the Gentoo team to
use ".maildir" (dot maildir) in place of "Maildir", it can be the source of
your problems if you've mixed "official" Gentoo ebuilds (expecting .maildir)
with others made by hand (using Maildir).
,- - [ Le mercred
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 09:31, Mike Rogers wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> According to the UPGRADE documentation for vpopmail 5.0, "If you are running
> a mysql, ldap or anything besides the default vpasswd(cdb) module follow the
> normal directions in the INSTALL file." What happens if you run cdb itself
on 10/5/01 10:30 AM, Ken Jones at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
> On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 10:20, Bill Shupp wrote:
>> on 10/4/01 8:44 PM, Tren Blackburn at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
>>
>>> Hi Bill;
>>>
>>> I am using vpopmail 5 with mysql, valias support in mysql, on redhat 7.1
>>> (gcc 3.0 though) and
]# ./valias -v
version: 5.0
Tren
-Original Message-
From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:21 AM
To: Tren Blackburn
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; vchkpw
Subject: Re: Upgrade
on 10/4/01 8:44 PM, Tren Blackburn at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
> Hi Bill;
>
on 10/5/01 10:30 AM, Ken Jones at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
> Bill,
>
> Have you tried it with a fresh install and a empty mysql database?
> I'm wondering if the mysql table definitions changed for the
> valias table.
Yes, I've dropped it and recreated it. Here's something interesting,
though:
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 10:20, Bill Shupp wrote:
> on 10/4/01 8:44 PM, Tren Blackburn at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
>
> > Hi Bill;
> >
> > I am using vpopmail 5 with mysql, valias support in mysql, on redhat 7.1
> > (gcc 3.0 though) and I have no problems with valias. It's working as
> > expected.
on 10/4/01 8:44 PM, Tren Blackburn at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
> Hi Bill;
>
> I am using vpopmail 5 with mysql, valias support in mysql, on redhat 7.1
> (gcc 3.0 though) and I have no problems with valias. It's working as
> expected. Anything I can do to help ya troubleshoot?
What happens wh
Hi Bill;
I am using vpopmail 5 with mysql, valias support in mysql, on redhat 7.1
(gcc 3.0 though) and I have no problems with valias. It's working as
expected. Anything I can do to help ya troubleshoot?
Regards,
Tren.
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Bill Shupp wrote:
> on 10/4/01 12:29 PM, [EMAIL PROT
on 10/4/01 12:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
> I just got back from our status meeting. Apparently, there ARE
> some things to fix in the 5.0 tarball, but 5.0 is considered
> to be stable except for database aliases. It hasn't been updated
> on the webpage because that has
I just got back from our status meeting. Apparently, there ARE
some things to fix in the 5.0 tarball, but 5.0 is considered
to be stable except for database aliases. It hasn't been updated
on the webpage because that hasn't been resolve, although Ken is
unable to reproduce the reported problem.
on 10/4/01 11:12 AM, Bill Shupp at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
> No. As far as I know, it's still considered a pre-release. I'm aware of a
> few problems, not all of which have been fixed yet. And the current fixes
> available are not in that release.
>
> When it's done, it'll be posted on the v
on 10/4/01 10:57 AM, Troy Settle at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
>
> Is this 5.0 final? I've just recently (yesterday) got caught up with this
> list, and saw several problems/resolutions with 5.0, and want to be sure
> that everything is golden before I start working with the new version.
No. As
.5638
http://www.psknet.com
** -Original Message-
** From: vol [mailto:vol]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:23 AM
** To: Mike Jimenez
** Cc: Qmail; vchkpw
** Subject: Re: Upgrade
**
**
** You should probably upgrade to vpopmail 5.0. 4.9.10 was th
]
Subject: Re: Upgrade from 4.9.10 to 4.10.35
On Mon, 2001-08-27 at 14:44, Brad Dameron wrote:
> First off:
>
> Using mysql for authentication.
>
> Well I tried to upgrade vpopmail so I could upgrade my qmailadmin for
> testing. But after I upgraded my users could no longer authen
On Mon, 2001-08-27 at 14:44, Brad Dameron wrote:
> First off:
>
> Using mysql for authentication.
>
> Well I tried to upgrade vpopmail so I could upgrade my qmailadmin for
> testing. But after I upgraded my users could no longer authenticate.
>
> vchkpw: vpopmail user not found
>
> I used the
-Original Message-
> From: Jan Knepper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 1:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10
>
>
> I already had checked all the options I used.
> They are the same from the 4.9 and 4.9.10 builds:
> --e
Knepper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 1:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10
>
>
> I already had checked all the options I used.
> They are the same from the 4.9 and 4.9.10 builds:
> --enable-ip-alias-domains=y
>
You just missed a thread on this, do you have the ~vpopmail/bin/vipmap setup
properly?
-Original Message-
From: Jan Knepper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10
I already had checked all the
I already had checked all the options I used.
They are the same from the 4.9 and 4.9.10 builds:
--enable-ip-alias-domains=y
maillog however shows no domain...
I guess the option --enable-ip-alias-domains=y is not really being
compiled into the code...
Apr 9 11:20:02 digitaldaemon vpopmail[9733
You probably forgot to set the default domain
(--enable-default-domain=domain.com).
Rick Updegrove wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Jan Knepper"
> > Subject: Upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10
> > Hi,
> > I just tried to upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10, but popping mail did not
> > seem t
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jan Knepper"
> Subject: Upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10
> Hi,
> I just tried to upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10, but popping mail did not
> seem to work after that.
> Once I restored the original ~/bin directory everything worked fine.
> Any ideas?
Hi,
Just a sugge
on 4/9/01 10:25 AM, Jan Knepper at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to upgrade from 4.9 to 4.9.10, but popping mail did not
> seem to work after that.
> Once I restored the original ~/bin directory everything worked fine.
>
> Any ideas?
Not without more information. Were your .
26 matches
Mail list logo
