On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 17:08, Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga wrote:
> Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Interesting, but overly complext in my opinion. Qmail
> > already supports redelivery of the email, might was well
> > let qmail handle all the complex safe email delivery stuff.
>
> Days ago I´v
Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Interesting, but overly complext in my opinion. Qmail
> already supports redelivery of the email, might was well
> let qmail handle all the complex safe email delivery stuff.
Days ago I´ve posted a message suggesting outgoing quota
support. Any threads about this
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 16:39, Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga wrote:
> Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Turns out this was easier than I thought.
> > I just tested it and I get the following when
> > mysql isn't running..
> >
> > @40003b97e8190189749c status: local 1/100 remote 0/400
> > @4000
Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Turns out this was easier than I thought.
> I just tested it and I get the following when
> mysql isn't running..
>
> @40003b97e8190189749c status: local 1/100 remote 0/400
> @40003b97e81905e95034 delivery 1: deferral:
> could_not_connect_to_mysql_updat
Turns out this was easier than I thought.
I just tested it and I get the following when
mysql isn't running..
@40003b97e8190189749c status: local 1/100 remote 0/400
@40003b97e81905e95034 delivery 1: deferral:
could_not_connect_to_mysql_updat
e_server/
@40003b97e81905e9929c status: l
