What you say may be true. But I can tell you from our experience that
Eudora cannot smtp authenticate unless cram-md5 is 'undef' in qmail-smtpd.c
whereas Outlook can.
At 02:17 AM 2/24/2004, you wrote:
From: Jeff Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> CRAM-MD5 (both with and without MySQL) breaks i
> Neither of those does cram-md5, they talk auth login.
Yes, they doesn't
I tried both KMail and Evolution... without success
they both discovered PLAIN, LOGIN and CRAM-MD5 smtp-auth method available,
but can't use CRAM-MD5...
and yes, as Jeremy Kitchen said:
> it's not life or death
> but reall
From: Jeff Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> CRAM-MD5 (both with and without MySQL) breaks if you are
> using Eudora as a mail client but otherwise works fine
> with Outlook and Outlook Express.
Neither of those does cram-md5, they talk auth login.
David
CRAM-MD5 (both with and without MySQL) breaks if you are using Eudora as a
mail client but otherwise works fine with Outlook and Outlook Express. Over
the last several days we have built three mailservers using Bill's Toaster
without mysql and also modified to use mysql. In each case we have had
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 00:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sir,
>
> I do not understand this log message here;
>
> ///
> Feb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 1077409974.518163 info msg 3670324: bytes 1742
> from <>
> qp 24127 uid 507
> Feb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 10774099
You will notice the message has come from <> which means its likely a bounce
message.
Without turning on more logging it's a little hard to say for certain.
Shane
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 2:42 PM
>To: [EMAIL
Sir,
I do not understand this log message here;
///
Feb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 1077409974.518163 info msg 3670324: bytes 1742
from <>
qp 24127 uid 507
Feb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 1077409974.700893 starting delivery 82: msg
3670324 t
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 22:58, Yuri Nosyrev wrote:
[snip can't do cram-md5 with vpopmail 5.4.0 with mysql]
> Is there any known troubles with CRAM-MD5 authentication method at
> vpopmail-5.4.0 (cause I've heard about misfunctioning of this smtp-auth
> method at vpopmail-5.4.0-rc1) ?
I know for a f
Hi, vchkpw-list
CRAM-MD5 smtp-auth method seems to be not working under my installation of
vpopmail-5.4.0 (mysql-4.0.18 as a back-end)/ spamcontrol-2.2.9
at the same time PLAIN smtp-auth is working fine
As far as I know, qmail have to use the latest qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2 patch to
work with vpop
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 11:09, Joe Boyce wrote:
> However, we do have the IP in question listed in our tcp.smtp file
> like this:
>
> 66.81.0.10:allow,RBLSMTPD="",RELAYCLIENT=""
>
> It also matches in the cdb file too. I've checked my run command and
> the correct tcp.smtp.cdb file is being looked
Hi all...
Recently installed vpopmail-5.2.2 on a Redhat 9 system. Working wonderfully
apart from the 'roaming' feature.
Config.status reports that the roaming option is enabled...yet my smtp.tcp
file doesn't get rebuilt with the Ips of roamers...
Anyone got any clues on to how to debug or fix th
Hi to all,
I am trying to compile vpopmail-5.4.0 on a SUN Ultra 5 running Solaris 9
with all the security and recommended patches. But I keep on getting this
error that for the life of me I can not figure it out.
Can anyone help???
my Configuration options are as follows:
bash-2.05# crle -c /v
Hey all,
5.4.0 here..
cd /usr/local/vpopmail/domains; for i in `ls`; do vdominfo $i; done..
and just looking at the output.. and I found some *strange* things..
domain: melodylodge.com
uid:89
gid:89
dir:/usr/local/vpopmail/domains/melodylodge.com
users: 0
domain: fchp-inc.org
uid:
Hello,
Not really a vpopmail thing, but I figure it wouldn't hurt to ask
here.
We use a dialup accelerator that the provider we buy dialup modems
provides for us. Due to the amount of people using this proxy, which
also proxies email requests, it sometimes get's listed in one of our
blacklists w
On Feb 23, 2004, at 2:43 AM, Alexander Bruns wrote:
On the Homepage at sourceforge of vpopmail, there 5.4.0 is stable and
5.4.2 is development.
Which version schould be running on production systems?
Is 5.4.2 only a bugfix-release or really a development-release?
Well, 5.4.1 and 5.4.2 were bugfi
I would suggest upgrading vpopmail to 5.4.0 at the very least.
>At 05:47 AM 2/23/2004, you wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I've recently been seeing a number of error messages in my qmail send
>>logs, which relate to messages with multiple recipients. The
>email being
>>sent gets delivered to some of the
Maybe I'm wrong but I do not think there should be spaces between email
addresses.
At 05:47 AM 2/23/2004, you wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently been seeing a number of error messages in my qmail send
logs, which relate to messages with multiple recipients. The email being
sent gets delivered to some
> >>Another problem, if you allow the www user access to the vpopmail
> >>programs - how do you keep every web site on the server from having full
> >>access to mail system? The vpopmail library functions don't provide
> >>authentication. (They do provide functions for doing authentication,
> >>b
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
Another problem, if you allow the www user access to the vpopmail
programs - how do you keep every web site on the server from having full
access to mail system? The vpopmail library functions don't provide
authentication. (They do provide functions for doing authentica
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> can't find any clues as to why its failing. I'm not even sure
> whether this is a vpopmail issue or a qmail-inject problem.
It's a qmail-inject/headers problem - the header seems broken.
You may want to try new-inject (http://cr.yp.to/mess822.html)
and/or change the headers.
> Another problem, if you allow the www user access to the vpopmail
> programs - how do you keep every web site on the server from having full
> access to mail system? The vpopmail library functions don't provide
> authentication. (They do provide functions for doing authentication,
> but the cal
> >>> o Start a separate instance of Apache on its own port or IP address,
> >>> running as the mail user. This instance should only serve mail
> >>> related
> >>> pages. This is very easy to do.
> >>>
> >>> o Don't allow any web sites on the mail server. Only run QmailAdmin
> >>> and
> >>> sq
Hi all,
I've recently been seeing a number of error messages in my qmail send
logs, which relate to messages with multiple recipients. The email being
sent gets delivered to some of the users on the list but not all. I've
checked and doublechecked that the accounts are valid, but can't find any
Hi,
http://vpopmail.sf.net/
5.4.2 - released 22-Feb-04
On the Homepage at sourceforge of vpopmail, there 5.4.0 is stable and 5.4.2
is development.
Which version schould be running on production systems?
Is 5.4.2 only a bugfix-release or really a development-release?
Greetings
Alexander Brun
24 matches
Mail list logo
