Re: [Uta] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog-02.txt

2022-09-15 Thread Thomas Fossati
Hi Chris, On 11/09/2022, 23:26, "Uta" wrote: > Hi, > > We've submitted an update to this ID for review by the Working Group. > > Thanks to our reviewers and their suggestions. We've incorporated most > of their recommended changes. > > We would like to ask the WG for consensus regarding the use o

Re: [Uta] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog-02.txt

2022-09-15 Thread Fries, Steffen
Hi Chris, Based on the implementations in industry that I'm aware of, I would see TLS 1.2 as mandatory and TLS 1.3 as optional. The take up of TLS 1.3 is not as fast and will take a while. Best regards Steffen From: Uta On Behalf Of Chris Lonvick Sent: Montag, 12. September 2022 00:25 To: Uta

Re: [Uta] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog-02.txt

2022-09-15 Thread tom petch
On 15/09/2022 14:23, Fries, Steffen wrote: Hi Chris, Based on the implementations in industry that I'm aware of, I would see TLS 1.2 as mandatory and TLS 1.3 as optional. The take up of TLS 1.3 is not as fast and will take a while. I agree. There is an I-D in OPSAWG to update RADIUS for En