Hi Chris, On 11/09/2022, 23:26, "Uta" <uta-boun...@ietf.org> wrote: > Hi, > > We've submitted an update to this ID for review by the Working Group. > > Thanks to our reviewers and their suggestions. We've incorporated most > of their recommended changes. > > We would like to ask the WG for consensus regarding the use of TLS 1.2 > and 1.3. Obviously, using 1.3 would be optimal. As a counterpoint, > there are a lot of old-n-slow syslog devices out there that might not > be up to running that, or might not be timely updated to run 1.3. Can > we get some comments from the reviewers on this?
If you are asking for WG consensus on the topic, the latest snapshot should be captured in ยง3 of RFC7252bis [1]. Some more context can be found in the discussion here [2]. cheers, t [1] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-11.html#name-protocol-versions [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/OoHffkD9PrQSxLOdwxFqp2KiZ84/ -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
