Re: [Uta] I-D Action: draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-11.txt

2023-03-02 Thread Rob Sayre
Hi, Since the WG consensus call is done, I don't think we need to press on in the WG. I will raise my concerns about ignoring UTS-46 in IETF Last Call. > "The limited scope of this specification likely mitigates potential confusion caused by the use > of visually similar characters in domain name

Re: [Uta] I-D Action: draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-11.txt

2023-03-02 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 3/2/23 1:26 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: Why all the '\\' characters before the '*'s? Suggested, double-quote the names instead, if the concern is whether the "*" is literal or a wildcard placeholder in the text for a generic example: Good point, we'll simplify that presentation. Peter __

Re: [Uta] I-D Action: draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-11.txt

2023-03-02 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:06:24AM -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > The authors hope that this version is now ready to move forward. Just a quick comment: As specified in Section 6.3, restricting the presented identifiers in wildcard character (e.g., \*.example.com but not \*.\*.example.c

Re: [Uta] I-D Action: draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-11.txt

2023-03-02 Thread Alexey Melnikov
Hi Peter, On 02/03/2023 18:06, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Hi all, This version represents our attempt to address feedback received during the recent consensus call. The primary changes are: 1. Clarify the difference between service delegation and DNS delegation. 2. Clarify the difference betw

Re: [Uta] I-D Action: draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-11.txt

2023-03-02 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Hi all, This version represents our attempt to address feedback received during the recent consensus call. The primary changes are: 1. Clarify the difference between service delegation and DNS delegation. 2. Clarify the difference between certificate wildcards and DNS wildcards. 3. Clarify t