the host.
Thank you,
Adam
From: Nick Foster mailto:bistrom...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 4:39:55 PM
To: Adam Kurisko
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing
> *From:* Nick Foster
> *Sent:* Friday, February 23, 2018 4:39:55 PM
>
> *To:* Adam Kurisko
> *Cc:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
> processor
> Please post your whole example.
>
> On Fri, Feb
nk you,
Adam
From: Nick Foster
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 4:39:55 PM
To: Adam Kurisko
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
processor
Please post your whole example.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018,
:* Nick Foster
> *Sent:* Friday, February 23, 2018 4:13:16 PM
>
> *To:* Adam Kurisko
> *Cc:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
> processor
> You don't need to do anything at all. Just loop. Maybe sleep so yo
gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 2:51:46 PM
To: Adam Kurisko
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
processor
That should work.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:45 AM Adam Kurisk
runs on my board, however when I run it the LEDs on the RX2
> and TRX frontend do not light up, so I am lead to believe that it
> actually might not be streaming.
>
>
> Just for clarification, Do the 'uhd::tx_streamer::send()' and
> 'uhd::rx_streamer::recv()' funct
___
From: Nick Foster
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 2:51:46 PM
To: Adam Kurisko
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
processor
That should work.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:45 AM Adam Kurisko
mailto:adamk...@outlook.com>
7;uhd::rx_streamer::recv()' functions route the signal to buffers on the
> ARM host or the fpga? I ask that because those functions seem to be the
> only way that I can get those LEDs on the frontend to light up signifying
> that the device is actually streaming.
>
>
> Thanks
ti_usrp' class instead?
Thanks,
Adam
From: Nick Foster
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 2:16:19 PM
To: Adam Kurisko
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
processor
Have you verified timestamps
> Adam
> --
> *From:* Nick Foster
> *Sent:* Friday, February 23, 2018 1:01:42 PM
> *To:* Adam Kurisko
> *Cc:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
> processor
>
> 1. yes
>
that the
device is actually streaming.
Thanks,
Adam
From: Nick Foster
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 1:01:42 PM
To: Adam Kurisko
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
processor
1. yes
2. RFNo
1. yes
2. RFNoC
I refer back to a post I wrote detailing loopback in the FPGA. It doesn't
work "out of the box" but can be made to with minor modification.
https://corvid.io/2017/04/22/stupid-rfnoc-tricks-loopback/
If you haven't used RFNoC before you should probably take on the Getting
Started
12 matches
Mail list logo
