% of the time, at least for me. If you find
>> any tricks other than those previously mentioned please let me know.
>>
>> I'm going to do some digging once I'm not under deadline-pressure, as
>> this issue is getting on my nerves somewhat.
>>
>> Kind
hat.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Sam
>
>
> --
> *From:* Wade Fife
> *Sent:* 06 March 2025 17:01
> *To:* David
> *Cc:* USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> *Subject:* [USRP-users] Re: rfnoc_image_builder error: trying to tool
> lock on already tool locked
oned please let me know.
I'm going to do some digging once I'm not under deadline-pressure, as this
issue is getting on my nerves somewhat.
Kind Regards,
Sam
From: Wade Fife
Sent: 06 March 2025 17:01
To: David
Cc: USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: [US
Wade,
Thank you for this, I took a look at repeat_fpga_build.py and I think that
will be very helpful. I am going to add some modifications that log the
types of failures I get and the amount.
I have the issue with two different builds, both with two custom RFNoC
blocks and HLS modules for my log
Hi David,
I'm surprised that you're seeing it that frequently. The Ettus continuous
integration tests build FPGAs regularly and from what I understand this
issue is pretty rare there. This makes me wonder if there's something about
the images you're building that causes this to reproduce more freq
Chris's suggestion worked great. thanks Martin and Chris!
Ryan
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 8:13 AM Martin Braun wrote:
> Hey Ryan,
>
> Chris' solution will get you running. If you're feeling adventurous, we've
> actually done a lot of work on rfnoc_image_builder since the release, so
> the master br
Hey Ryan,
Chris' solution will get you running. If you're feeling adventurous, we've
actually done a lot of work on rfnoc_image_builder since the release, so
the master branch version of UHD has a fix for this issue (no need to
downgrade ruamel.yaml), but of course it requires building UHD from so
I’ve run into this problem with UHD 4.6. That specific function got removed in
the latest version so in order to make it work, I had to downgrade the
ruamel.yaml version with the following:
> pip install "ruamel.yaml<0.18.0"
Once you downgrade it, it should work.
__
Hello Wade,
Thanks to your remarks I’ve figured out that the tool was referring to the
image_builde.py file in the wrong directory.
It appears that UHD4.6 installs its files in :
/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages since the previous version I had
installed the same files in /usr/local/l
Hi Enrico,
The line numbers in the traceback don't seem to match UHD 4.6. Can you
check if you maybe have different or multiple versions installed? And
double check that the rfnoc_image_builder being called is indeed the
version for UHD 4.6?
For example, if you installed from source, double check
I had used a build script to install some other software that was supposed to use conda. Pretty sure that went sideways cause my PYTHONPATH included python3.9, which isn’t anywhere on my system.Most likely a layer 0 issue :)On Jun 29, 2023, at 19:31, Brian Padalino wrote:Strange
Strange - was it split between two different UHD installations possibly?
Is the main UHD installation in one place whereas the image_builder was
placed somewhere else?
I install to alternative locations so I don't install to /usr, so could
there be a UHD install issue where it installs to the sys
Thanks Brian, figured it out. Was a PYTHONPATH issue. For some reason my
img_builder was in /usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages.
Seems to be working now.
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 2:41 PM Brian Padalino wrote:
> UHD seems to want to install to local/lib/python3.10-dist-packages/uhd -
> do yo
UHD seems to want to install to local/lib/python3.10-dist-packages/uhd - do
you have that as part of your installation?
I have an imgbuilder directory and image_builder.py inside there.
You have an issue with, specifically, from uhd.imgbuilder import
image_builder?
Brian
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at
Yea, I’m an intermittent RFNoC user. no issues building UHD, just wondering if
the image builder module isn’t getting included in the source build.
> On Jun 29, 2023, at 11:51, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
>
> On 29/06/2023 11:44, jmalo...@umass.edu wrote:
>>
>> In my experience, getting UHD to
That’s not been my experience. I have about 8 machines (some upgraded, some
fresh installs) running Ubuntu 22.04 and UHD 4.X with zero build issues.
> On Jun 29, 2023, at 11:45, jmalo...@umass.edu wrote:
>
>
> In my experience, getting UHD to run on Ubuntu 22 is a huge hassle. If you
> can
On 29/06/2023 11:44, jmalo...@umass.edu wrote:
In my experience, getting UHD to run on Ubuntu 22 is a huge hassle. If
you can, I recommend downgrading to 20.04(but no lower) and it should
install fairly easily.
I built UHD 4.4.0.0 on 22.04 just the other night, and installed it
alongside t
In my experience, getting UHD to run on Ubuntu 22 is a huge hassle. If you can,
I recommend downgrading to 20.04(but no lower) and it should install fairly
easily.
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to
This was resolved… I had to add the yml description block file into
/usr/local/share/uhd/rfnoc/blocks/, then the image was created with any issues.
Thanks
___
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-use
19 matches
Mail list logo
