On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 2:56 PM Rob Kossler wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 2:09 PM Brian Padalino wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:11 PM Rob Kossler wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 7:46 PM Brian Padalino
> wrote:
> >> > Before RFNoC 4.0, there was a generic NoC shell that was us
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 2:09 PM Brian Padalino wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:11 PM Rob Kossler wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 7:46 PM Brian Padalino wrote:
>> > Before RFNoC 4.0, there was a generic NoC shell that was used instead of
>> > one being generated for each of the blocks.
>>
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:11 PM Rob Kossler wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 7:46 PM Brian Padalino wrote:
> > Before RFNoC 4.0, there was a generic NoC shell that was used instead of
> one being generated for each of the blocks.
> >
> > I see there is a noc_shell_generic_ctrlport_pyld_chdr, but i
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 7:46 PM Brian Padalino wrote:
> Before RFNoC 4.0, there was a generic NoC shell that was used instead of one
> being generated for each of the blocks.
>
> I see there is a noc_shell_generic_ctrlport_pyld_chdr, but it isn't used
> anywhere.
>
> Is there a reason that a gene
