Re: [USRP-users] Issues/suggestions for latest rfnocmodtool

2019-04-04 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
Hello, Preface: When I checkout older RFNoC versions and using "rfnocmodtool newmod" I also have to use the srcdir flag as suggested above in your thread: rfnocmodtool newmod [NAME OF THE MODULE] --srcdir ~/{USER_PREFIX}/src/gr-ettus/python/rfnoc_ modtool/rfnoc-newmod/ That works fine, but t

Re: [USRP-users] FPGA compatibility

2018-10-15 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
I reproduced the same issue (except I completely uninstalled GR, UHD, gr-ettus, etc. before doing rm -rf rfnoc then installed rfnoc from scratch) then checked out 'eb5eed' in uhd-fpga which fixed the FPGA compatibility number issue but there seems to be an underlying problem with that. I can't use

Re: [USRP-users] Core dump with UHD_3.11, X310, and LFTX

2018-05-11 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
22095b2c3a8dd1c764d7b80d3128c44721597b>). >>>>> It is being included in the next set of commits on the maint branch that >>>>> should be available in the next few days. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Michael >>>>>

Re: [USRP-users] Core dump with UHD_3.11, X310, and LFTX

2018-05-11 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
z >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Michael, >>>>> >>>>> I see new commits have been entered in the uhd maint branch in the >>>>> last couple days. Were any related to this issue? >>>>> >>>>> A

Re: [USRP-users] Core dump with UHD_3.11, X310, and LFTX

2018-05-11 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
t branch in the last >>>> couple days. Were any related to this issue? >>>> >>>> Andrew >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Michael West >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Louis/Andrew, >>>&g

Re: [USRP-users] Core dump with UHD_3.11, X310, and LFTX

2018-05-04 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
>> progress. We should have the fix available on the head of the maint branch >>> very soon. Thank you for bringing it to our attention! >>> >>> Regards, >>> Michael >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:54 AM, switchlanez via USRP-users < >

Re: [USRP-users] Revert rfnoc-devel to older commit / update rfnoc-devel to rfnoc-maint HEAD

2018-05-02 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
d >> git checkout ba11bf2d699957e9a5d9b587de045162d2fce3e3 >> >> cd gnuradio >> git checkout 11d59e9f227e3d3f5c388c376ee59e0cfa021dcf >> git submodule update --init --recursive >> >> cd gr-ettus >> git checkout fbea7f763460ffb42592c6c1c389047b6e0e1a10

Re: [USRP-users] Core dump with UHD_3.11, X310, and LFTX

2018-05-02 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
ess. > We should have the fix available on the head of the maint branch very > soon. Thank you for bringing it to our attention! > > Regards, > Michael > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:54 AM, switchlanez via USRP-users < > usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > >>

Re: [USRP-users] Revert rfnoc-devel to older commit / update rfnoc-devel to rfnoc-maint HEAD

2018-05-01 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
7b6e0e1a10 > > cd uhd-fpga > git checkout 8b731c3b277fb2caee0b9633c9b159e55f175486 > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 12:29 PM, Yacine Bouguechal < > yacine.bouguec...@ensta-paristech.fr> wrote: > >> Hello, >> Can you please tell me what versions of the different packag

Re: [USRP-users] Revert rfnoc-devel to older commit / update rfnoc-devel to rfnoc-maint HEAD

2018-04-29 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
.fr> wrote: > >> Hello, >> Can you please tell me what versions of the different packages you used >> because I am also trying to revert back to old commit. >> Thank you. >> >> >> -- >> *De: *"switchlanez via USRP-

Re: [USRP-users] Revert rfnoc-devel to older commit / update rfnoc-devel to rfnoc-maint HEAD

2018-04-29 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
lease tell me what versions of the different packages you used > because I am also trying to revert back to old commit. > Thank you. > > > ---------- > *De: *"switchlanez via USRP-users" > *À: *"Nicolas Cuervo" > *Cc: *"USRP-

Re: [USRP-users] Revert rfnoc-devel to older commit / update rfnoc-devel to rfnoc-maint HEAD

2018-04-29 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
I got uhd to build. Thanks for your help. On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 11:33 AM, switchlanez wrote: > Thank you for the response, Nicolas. I realized the aec2fe9 commit from > 27-JUN-17 only applies to the "maint" branch in the "fpga" repo. Instead I > should checkout commits from the "rfnoc-devel" b

Re: [USRP-users] Revert rfnoc-devel to older commit / update rfnoc-devel to rfnoc-maint HEAD

2018-04-29 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
Thank you for the response, Nicolas. I realized the aec2fe9 commit from 27-JUN-17 only applies to the "maint" branch in the "fpga" repo. Instead I should checkout commits from the "rfnoc-devel" branch of the "fpga," "gr-ettus," and "uhd" repos and "master" branch of the "gnuradio" repo (from gnurad

[USRP-users] Revert rfnoc-devel to older commit / update rfnoc-devel to rfnoc-maint HEAD

2018-04-25 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
Hello, I did a fresh install of the latest rfnoc-devel (using pybombs prefix init ~/rfnoc -R rfnoc -a rfnoc) and RFNoC blocks do not work (such as FIR and Rx Radio, possibly related to USRP-users mailer subject: Core dump with UHD_3.11, X310, and LFTX). So I am trying to checkout and build rfnoc-

Re: [USRP-users] RFNoC: FIR Filter final tap never gets written to settings register

2018-04-21 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
the final tap: > sr_write(SR_RELOAD_TLAST, uint32_t(taps.back())); > > The half a sample shift is odd though. > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 6:23 AM Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users < > usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > >> On 04/20/2018 12:01 PM, switchlanez via USRP-users wrote:

[USRP-users] RFNoC: FIR Filter final tap never gets written to settings register

2018-04-20 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
Hello, An oddity regarding the RFNoC FIR Filter block. fir_block_ctrl_impl.cpp writes tap values to the settings registers with: for (size_t i = 0; i < taps.size() - 1; i++) { sr_write(SR_RELOAD, uint32_t(taps[i])); } which loops from 0 to taps.size() - 1. So if I define 41 taps from

Re: [USRP-users] Core dump with UHD_3.11, X310, and LFTX

2018-04-20 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
I have an issue that may be related. Using LFTX and LFRX boards in an X310, anytime I use the RFNoC Radio block in Rx mode the run terminates with: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' what(): map::at Following for updates. Andrew On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:54 AM

Re: [USRP-users] problem to work witth source file and RFnoC block and FIR block

2018-04-20 Thread switchlanez via USRP-users
Build should fail with 1000 coefficients and a Window Block instance. The most taps I've gotten is 334 with a DUC and DDC instantiated along with the FIR. If I instantiate 2 Digital Gain blocks with 2 FIR blocks, the most taps I could build was 186 taps for each FIR. These were found through trial