Hi Jeyakumar,
I don't really think that you need to be thinking in terms of "adding value" yet; defining
the problem you want to solve, however, is paramount.
> Hence if someone can join via google meet or teams and help me provide a boot start in
understanding the code, I should be able to
On 19/09/2023 03:24, ouzan...@hotmail.com wrote:
50-54 dB TX/RX isolation is very low as a dynamic range of many
applications. For our application, this is our main problem. That is
why we want to try to bypass and see if the isolation of the card
increases. There is no data about the TX/RX
On 19/09/2023 07:44, Marcus Müller wrote:
Hi Jeyakumar,
obviously, we'd point you to the same resources on the Ettus knowledge
base that you've already read, probably. So, um, can you maybe phrase
this in a less open-ended way? What do you need help with?
Also: "Add AI capabilities", that
Hi,
On 19.09.23 09:24, ouzan...@hotmail.com wrote:
Dear Marcus,
Thank you for your reply. I think your RF engineers have an aim to have the pads on the
PCB for bypassing the switches. In other case, why do you have these pads if they
haven't tested if they are working ?
When you build a co
Hi Jeyakumar,
obviously, we'd point you to the same resources on the Ettus knowledge base that you've
already read, probably. So, um, can you maybe phrase this in a less open-ended way? What
do you need help with?
Also: "Add AI capabilities", that makes my "underdefined term usage" meter ha
Dear all,
Do we have any videos or can someone help me with a code walk through of USRP
github codebase.
I have taken this project as my final year MTech project and would like to add
AI capabilities after understanding the code.
Many thanks for your support.
Thanks
Jeyakumar K
_
Dear Marcus,\
\
Thank you for your reply. I think your RF engineers have an aim to have the
pads on the PCB for bypassing the switches. In other case, why do you have
these pads if they haven't tested if they are working ? Is it possible if you
could ask your RF engineers which component values
