On 17/05/2023 18:01, cjohn...@serranosystems.com wrote:
Hi Marcus^2,
Thanks for taking a look at this.
Yes, I am using 10G interface, but you will notice my streaming
request was only at 200Mbps (via command —rate=200e6).
|eno1: flags=4163 mtu 1500 inet
192.168.0.67 netmask 255.255.
Hi Marcus^2,
Thanks for taking a look at this.
Yes, I am using 10G interface, but you will notice my streaming request was
only at 200Mbps (via command —rate=200e6).
> ```
> eno1: flags=4163 mtu 1500
> inet 192.168.0.67 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255
> inet6 fe
Thanks. Looks like I'm getting significantly behind in versions. -p
On 5/17/2023 1:23:42 PM, Marcus Müller wrote:
Hi Page,
not quite sure which problems you're referring to, but in general, UHD has only
been getting better :) So, I'd recommend you use a current long-time supported
version of Ubu
Hey Cy,
it's getting a bit late here in Germany¹, I'll try to come up with a test setup tomorrow;
haven't tried that feature (it being rather fresh).
Excellent debugging by the way; my first reaction was that, hm, if MAC address resolution
fails, the device might be trying to inadvisably stre
On 17/05/2023 15:20, cjohnson . wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Okay, thanks for that information.
What should we try next?
Thanks,
--Cy
Could you share the "ifconfig" for your host (or whatever the modern
equivalent is with the "ip" toolset).
On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 12:05:39 PM PDT, Marcus D. L
Hi Marcus,
Okay, thanks for that information.
What should we try next?
Thanks,--Cy
On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 12:05:39 PM PDT, Marcus D. Leech
wrote:
On 17/05/2023 14:49, cjohn...@serranosystems.com wrote:
Hi Marcus,
I am still interested to know how your team tests to ver
On 17/05/2023 14:49, cjohn...@serranosystems.com wrote:
Hi Marcus,
I am still interested to know how your team tests to verify the FPGA
is sending the data….meanwhile I did two quick experiments based on
your suggestions.
I have no visibility into the details of the R&D teams testing
appar
Hi Marcus,
I am still interested to know how your team tests to verify the FPGA is sending
the data….meanwhile I did two quick experiments based on your suggestions.
1) Same setup using the second interface I setup on the network card for the
remote port @192.168.30.30, “./remote_rx.py --rate=2
Hi Marcus,
I appreciate you quick responses. They have been useful.
If you look at the code in xport_adapter_ctrl.cpp, specifically
xport_adapter_ctrl::add_remote_ep_route(), you will notice that the dest_udp
is required.I don't think we are getting to the "catch" part, since based on
all the
Hi Page,
not quite sure which problems you're referring to, but in general, UHD has only been
getting better :) So, I'd recommend you use a current long-time supported version of
Ubuntu, i.e., Ubuntu 22.04LTS.
Best regards,
Marcus
On 17.05.23 19:30, page wrote:
For some time I have been usin
On 17/05/2023 14:03, cjohn...@serranosystems.com wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Better news. In an attempt to get my system to match what you might be
using, a “known” state, I updated the FPGA image.
So the “Requested remote UDP streaming, but transport adapter sfp1
does not support it!" is gone, and I
Hi Marcus,
Better news. In an attempt to get my system to match what you might be using,
a “known” state, I updated the FPGA image.
So the “Requested remote UDP streaming, but transport adapter sfp1 does not
support it!" is gone, and I am at “Device was unable to look up Ethernet (MAC)
addres
For some time I have been using a B-210 in research and development. I haven't
been active on the list for a awhile. I recall someone citing problems using
Ubuntu 20.x with USRP. As a result, I'm still using Ubuntu 18.x, which has been
working fine. Have the problems with using Ubuntu 20.x been
Actually until I looked at the diagram I did not know that. The 2974 is a
product designed by the traditional NI R&D team, and I’ve never had one in my
hands.
But yeah I agree it should work like any other X310.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 17, 2023, at 12:27 PM, cjohn...@serranosystems.com
Hi Marcus,
On an external host.
As you know, the sfp1 interface is not connected to the internal switch (going
to the i7, only sfp0). But we are not using the i7. Instead, we are using
sfp1, connected to a different host, which should work similar to an X310 (with
external host).
Thanks,
On 17/05/2023 11:57, cjohn...@serranosystems.com wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Thank you for responding.
I can confirm that the USRP (192.168.30.2) and host (192.168.30.1) are
working (streaming data), as I wanted to verify before trying the
remote streaming.
I have added the 192.168.30.30 as second i
Hi Marcus,
Thank you for responding.
I can confirm that the USRP (192.168.30.2) and host (192.168.30.1) are working
(streaming data), as I wanted to verify before trying the remote streaming.
I have added the 192.168.30.30 as second interface on the host, and it is
responding to pings. I do n
On 17/05/2023 02:51, cjohn...@serranosystems.com wrote:
Hi,
My understanding is that remote streaming is available in UHD>=4.3 via:
https://files.ettus.com/manual/page_stream.html#stream_remote
However, I can not get it working using the example python scripts
provided, and also programmatic
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:35 PM Marcus D. Leech wrote:
>
> On 16/05/2023 20:31, Michael Toussaint wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am testing the LO synching on a single N321 using the 2 Tx channels
> > on the N321.
> >
> > I have followed the LO setup steps from the knowledge base,
> > https://kb.ettus.c
19 matches
Mail list logo
