On 01/26/2021 12:33 AM, dario via USRP-users wrote:
Thanks for answering so quickly. The reason i posted here is that it's
actually uhd which is complaining the topology is not compatible, not
gnuradio. I can see that there are several blocks that have multiple
in/out and i didn't realize phosp
Thanks for answering so quickly. The reason i posted here is that it's actually
uhd which is complaining the topology is not compatible, not gnuradio. I can
see that there are several blocks that have multiple in/out and i didn't
realize phosphor now has different ports but i still don't underst
Hi,
Using RFNOC 4.0 with a few of my custom blocks, I get the following warning
at UHD startup (after having run it at least once before):
[WARNING] [RFNOC::GRAPH] One or more blocks timed out during flush!
I'm confident it is something that I'm doing incorrectly with my block, but
I'm wondering
I agree that this question is more in the domain of GNURadio, but I do
want to point out that RFNoC 4.0 blocks most certainly can have
different numbers of inputs and outputs. A good example is the RFNoC
Fosphor block:
https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/tree/master/fpga/usrp3/lib/rfnoc/fosphor
h
This is clearly a question for the discuss-gnuradio mailing list.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 25, 2021, at 2:43 PM, dario via USRP-users
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> I created a block with two output ports and one input port however when i try
> to connect it via stream endpoints gnuradio compani
Hi,I created a block with two output ports and one input port however when i
try to connect it via stream endpoints gnuradio companion claims it doesn't
know how to handle this. I then added a sexond inout as i recall that on uhd
3.15 it is necessary to have as many inputs as outputs but it gave
Followup questions about the N310
> Currently, the tuning times are actually a bit slower than the B200/E310
> (~140 ms) because the frequency is adjusted via SW SPI commands to the
> AD9371 transceiver. A future performance enhancement will be to
implement
> frequency tunes via GPIO lines from
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:33 AM Cédric Hannotier via USRP-users
wrote:
> So the action is propagated by the gain block iif the controller is
> built with UHD and hence recognized by uhd_usrp_probe.
> Building the controller as OOT makes the block unrecognized and
> hence falls back to name 'Bloc
Dear Aaron and Rob,
On 22/01/21 14:15, Rob Kossler wrote:
> > On 21/01/21 22:49, Rob Kossler wrote:
> > > Also, regarding building in-tree, are you opposed to building in-tree as
> > > even
> > > a temporary test case? It's not too difficult to do. I am not
> > > talking about the
> > > FPGA co
I believe those pages cover the proprietary PCIE chip made by NI and are
omitted deliberately.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 25, 2021, at 1:29 AM, 张忠山 via USRP-users
> wrote:
>
> x3xx.pdf should have 28 sheets, but only 23 is there.
>
> sheet 13, 14 15, 16, 17 missing
>
> Where can I find
Hi,
you didn't paste an error message.
--M
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 7:02 AM --- via GNU Radio, the Free & Open-Source
Toolkit for Software Radio wrote:
> Dear friends:
> I'm installing rfnoc on E312, when I cross compile gnu radio, I
> execute this command：cmake -Wno-dev
> -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAI
11 matches
Mail list logo
