Re: [USRP-users] UHD TX power level on B210

2018-08-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 08/09/2018 07:14 PM, Ron Economos via USRP-users wrote: After upgrading UHD, I noticed that the TX power level on my B210 has increased by about 5 dB (with the exact same flow graph). Is this an intentional change, or a side effect of some other fix? The power level change occurs between UH

[USRP-users] UHD TX power level on B210

2018-08-09 Thread Ron Economos via USRP-users
After upgrading UHD, I noticed that the TX power level on my B210 has increased by about 5 dB (with the exact same flow graph). Is this an intentional change, or a side effect of some other fix? The power level change occurs between UHD 3.11.1.0 and UHD 3.12.0. Ron _

Re: [USRP-users] Problems with MPM 3.13 on N310

2018-08-09 Thread Sayyed Dormiani Tabatabaei via USRP-users
I can't comment on the MPM or images but we had N310 streaming timeout issues that were recently fixed. Upgrading from UHD 13 to 13.0.0.1 fixed all our (seemingly randomly occurring) streaming issues. On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Rob Kossler via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:

[USRP-users] Problems with MPM 3.13 on N310

2018-08-09 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
When I first started using MPM 3.13, I was pleased to see the fast initialization times compared to previous versions. Now, after spending the better part of a couple of days troubleshooting issues, I am much less thrilled with this version. The two attachments show the resulting spectrum from an

Re: [USRP-users] N210 + UBX-40 = big spurs below 500 MHz

2018-08-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 08/09/2018 04:42 PM, Brett Killion wrote: I'm using UHD 3.12.0 and it's associated images that I pulled off of the github release page a few weeks ago. Motherboard is N210r4 and daughterboard is UBX-40 v2. According to uhd_usrp_probe my firmware version is 12.4 and my FPGA version is 11.1.

Re: [USRP-users] N210 + UBX-40 = big spurs below 500 MHz

2018-08-09 Thread Brett Killion via USRP-users
I'm using UHD 3.12.0 and it's associated images that I pulled off of the github release page a few weeks ago. Motherboard is N210r4 and daughterboard is UBX-40 v2. According to uhd_usrp_probe my firmware version is 12.4 and my FPGA version is 11.1. On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:31 PM Marcus D. Leech w

Re: [USRP-users] N210 + UBX-40 = big spurs below 500 MHz

2018-08-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 08/09/2018 04:09 PM, Brett Killion wrote: Signal and spurs are raised by the gain amount. (see attached screenshots) Some other notes: - I changed the sample rate -- the spurs stayed at the same frequencies and amplitudes. - I changed the amplitude of the samples I was sending to the DAC --

Re: [USRP-users] N210 + UBX-40 = big spurs below 500 MHz

2018-08-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 08/09/2018 02:58 PM, Brett Killion wrote: There is no GPSDO installed. I am just using the power supply that shipped with the radio. Just for giggles, trying turning the gain up to 10dB when below 500Mhz -- does that change the spur:signal ratio? On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:37 PM Marcus D.

Re: [USRP-users] N210 + UBX-40 = big spurs below 500 MHz

2018-08-09 Thread Brett Killion via USRP-users
There is no GPSDO installed. I am just using the power supply that shipped with the radio. On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:37 PM Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > On 08/09/2018 11:19 AM, Brett Killion via USRP-users wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a N210 with a UBX-40 d

Re: [USRP-users] N210 + UBX-40 = big spurs below 500 MHz

2018-08-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 08/09/2018 11:19 AM, Brett Killion via USRP-users wrote: Hello, I have a N210 with a UBX-40 daughtercard. I am outputting a moderately low power 250KHz wide BPSK signal. If I set the center frequency anywhere in the direct conversion path (500 MHz-6 GHz) the output is beautiful with no spu

Re: [USRP-users] USRP2r4 \w RFX2400 fails with UHD3.14

2018-08-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 08/09/2018 06:03 AM, Johannes Demel via USRP-users wrote: Hi! Thanks for your reply. We didn't update because there was no Warning that suggested to do so. Anyways, now we updated the FPGA and Firmware. As a summary we had 'FW Version: 12.3' and 'FPGA Version: 10.0'. Now it is 'FW Version:

Re: [USRP-users] [Discuss-gnuradio] Implement a signal processing block in the FPGA of USRP

2018-08-09 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 08/09/2018 10:11 AM, Linda20071 wrote: What are the USRP products that could support RFNoC? Can it work on N200 up? I would suppose this has nothing to do with the type of daughterboard? X3x0, E310, N3x0 Besides, what linux Xilinx design tool should I use for this purpose? Vivado. https

Re: [USRP-users] yocto meta-ettus

2018-08-09 Thread Philip Balister via USRP-users
On 08/08/2018 11:49 PM, Walter Maguire via USRP-users wrote: > Hi all, > > The readme file at https://github.com/EttusResearch/meta-ettus seems to > be out of date with the current sumo release of poky. meta-ettus seems > to require sumo branch (not the master) due to requiring u-boot > 2018.1(mas

Re: [USRP-users] about rfnoc nocshell

2018-08-09 Thread Jon Pendlum via USRP-users
Hi. Yes, but you should leave that one alone and setup your own datamover on another HP AXI port. What do you want to accomplish? Jonathon On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 11:44 AM, carry chen wrote: > > Thanks Jonathon! > Does uhd fpga use datamover access PS DDR now? > > Best Regards, > Carry > > _

Re: [USRP-users] USRP2r4 \w RFX2400 fails with UHD3.14

2018-08-09 Thread Johannes Demel via USRP-users
Hi! Thanks for your reply. We didn't update because there was no Warning that suggested to do so. Anyways, now we updated the FPGA and Firmware. As a summary we had 'FW Version: 12.3' and 'FPGA Version: 10.0'. Now it is 'FW Version: 12.4' and 'FPGA Version: 10.1'. I hope these are the latest v