Re: [USRP-users] Assistance In Stopping Python Script After Removing Ethernet Connection

2018-04-03 Thread Ian Buckley via USRP-users
> On Apr 3, 2018, at 10:24 PM, Matheou, Konstantin J. (GRC-LCI0)[ZIN > TECHNOLOGIES INC] via USRP-users wrote: > > Thanks Marcus… > > Actually, this is what I am looking into currently. > > Unfortunately, I get the PID, but when I reconnect and go to terminal, the > kill -9 PID seems to no

Re: [USRP-users] Assistance In Stopping Python Script After Removing Ethernet Connection

2018-04-03 Thread Matheou, Konstantin J. (GRC-LCI0)[ZIN TECHNOLOGIES INC] via USRP-users
Thanks Marcus... Actually, this is what I am looking into currently. Unfortunately, I get the PID, but when I reconnect and go to terminal, the kill -9 PID seems to not stop it. I am currently using a VM to do this on a Windows OS platform. I am not sure if this is the reason... So, it seems

Re: [USRP-users] Assistance In Stopping Python Script After Removing Ethernet Connection

2018-04-03 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 04/04/2018 12:37 AM, Matheou, Konstantin J. (GRC-LCI0)[ZIN TECHNOLOGIES INC] via USRP-users wrote: To All, I have tried to use the Header block approach which is found on the Internet to try to fix this issue… Here is the issue… I am capturing samples via an antenna on the E310. I used

[USRP-users] Assistance In Stopping Python Script After Removing Ethernet Connection

2018-04-03 Thread Matheou, Konstantin J. (GRC-LCI0)[ZIN TECHNOLOGIES INC] via USRP-users
To All, I have tried to use the Header block approach which is found on the Internet to try to fix this issue... Here is the issue... I am capturing samples via an antenna on the E310. I used GRC to create the flowgraph to capture samples to go to a file. But, I have to remove the ethernet ca

[USRP-users] External PA + filter

2018-04-03 Thread Sten Wallin via USRP-users
Hi, I need to connect an external PA and filter to the Ettus SDR radios, preferably 2x20W or more. This is for LTE band 3 and/or band 8 (as separate bands, not dual-band). Have anyone any recommendations for that? Best regards, Sten smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic s

Re: [USRP-users] Transmission over 1 Gigabit Ethernet

2018-04-03 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 04/03/2018 02:05 PM, Антон Заболотский via USRP-users wrote: I meant, could I use them for transfer data from x310? Compatibility between each of them and X310. I can use JD089B or some fiber transceiver +media converter? Any 1GigE to copper SFP+ module should work. Then a pair of dual-

Re: [USRP-users] Transmission over 1 Gigabit Ethernet

2018-04-03 Thread Антон Заболотский via USRP-users
I meant, could I use them for transfer data from x310? Compatibility between each of them and X310. I can use JD089B or  some fiber transceiver +media converter? -- Отправлено из Mail.Ru для Android вторник, 03 апреля 2018г., 20:06 +03:00 от Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users usrp-users@lists.ettu

Re: [USRP-users] Transmission over 1 Gigabit Ethernet

2018-04-03 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 04/03/2018 12:22 PM, Антон Заболотский via USRP-users wrote: Hi everyone. Are these devices suitable for transmission by 1 Gigabit Ethernet? HPE JD089B X120 1G SFP RJ45 TP-Link MC210CS 1000Mbit RJ45 1000Mbit SC They're both for 1GiGe, but if you're asking are they mutually compatible? One

[USRP-users] Transmission over 1 Gigabit Ethernet

2018-04-03 Thread Антон Заболотский via USRP-users
Hi everyone. Are these devices suitable for transmission by 1 Gigabit Ethernet? HPE JD089B X120 1G SFP RJ45 TP-Link MC210CS 1000Mbit RJ45 1000Mbit SC___ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-use

Re: [USRP-users] X310 PCIe Error enumerating NI-RIO devices

2018-04-03 Thread Антон Заболотский via USRP-users
I also tried to setup Ubuntu 14.04.3 on the another PC. And I've got the same result.  Driver has not installed until I made the following from mail : http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/2015-November/016837.html   --- sudo /usr/local/natinst/nikal/bin/nikalKer

Re: [USRP-users] customize processing of U and L messages

2018-04-03 Thread Nicolas Cuervo via USRP-users
Hello Cedric, This information is listed in the manual for error/problem troubleshooting) [1] The "D" is a dropped packet on reception, and shows up as an indication of a sequence error caused by an overflow on networked devices. [2] The "S" is a sequence error on transmission. The possible cau

Re: [USRP-users] customize processing of U and L messages

2018-04-03 Thread Cedric Roux via USRP-users
On 04/03/18 00:45, Martin Braun via USRP-users wrote: If you're on 3.11.* or later, then you can use -DUHD_LOG_FASTPATH_DISABLE to disable the printing of UOSDL. If you want to know about U, S and L events, then use recv_async_msg() as you're already doing. If you want to know about O and D event