On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 9:02 PM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Martin,
>
>
>
> Sorry, I actually didn't notice the "LoadModule" in there.
>
> It's strange to see a LoadModule and the other configuration all
> togeth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Martin,
On 10/7/19 11:45, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:10 PM Christopher Schultz <
> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Martin,
>>
>> On 10/7/19 07:22, Martin Knoblau
#
# Mount the "/cb2" application to worker "cb2"
#
JkMount /cb2/* cb2
#
# Unmount "/cb2/docs" from worker "cb2" to allow static content
# beeing served by apache. Same for "/cb2/cgi-bin"
#
JkUnMount /cb2/docs/* cb2
So we JkUnMount the
setup. Nothing interesting to
see there. So I am still confused here.
Based on this, from a previous post :
> quote
> #
> # CB2 - Portal
> #
> # Mount the "/cb2" application to worker "cb2"
> #
> JkMount /cb2/* cb2
> #
> # Unmount "/cb2/do
receives the same
response, etc.
Until the (smart) browser realises that it is always requesting and receiving the same
thing and calls quits.
What you are showing above as log, is only the httpd access log.
Do you have an access log enabled in tomcat, and do you see these same accesses
th
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:10 PM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Martin,
>
> On 10/7/19 07:22, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > The mod_jk configuration basically looks like:
> >
> > LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Martin,
On 10/7/19 07:22, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> The mod_jk configuration basically looks like:
>
> LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
>
> JkWorkersFile "conf/cb2/workers.properties" JkShmFile
> "logs/jk-runtime-status" JkLogFile "logs/mod_j
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 3:31 PM Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> пн, 7 окт. 2019 г. в 15:44, Martin Knoblauch :
> >
> > Hi Konstantin,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 2:36 PM Konstantin Kolinko <
> knst.koli...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2. For Tomcat to issue a redirect, the "docs" directory mus
;
> >>JkShmFile "logs/jk-runtime-status"
> >>JkLogFile "logs/mod_jk.log"
> >>JkLogLevel info
> >>JkWatchdogInterval 60
> >>
> >>
> >> And then later inside a virtual host:
&g
пн, 7 окт. 2019 г. в 15:44, Martin Knoblauch :
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 2:36 PM Konstantin Kolinko
> wrote:
>
>
> 2. For Tomcat to issue a redirect, the "docs" directory must be
> > present in your web application. It can be empty, but it must be
> > present. (If there is none
t;logs/mod_jk.log"
> > JkLogLevel info
> > JkWatchdogInterval 60
> >
> >
> > And then later inside a virtual host:
> >
> > #
> > # CB2 - Portal
> > #
> > # Mount the "/cb2" application to worker "cb2"
> > #
> >
JkShmFile "logs/jk-runtime-status"
JkLogFile "logs/mod_jk.log"
JkLogLevel info
JkWatchdogInterval 60
And then later inside a virtual host:
#
# CB2 - Portal
#
# Mount the "/cb2" application to worker "cb2"
#
JkMount /cb2/* cb2
#
# Unmount &qu
ct/2019:12:30:47 +0200] [2 ms] 160.46.219.110 - "POST /cb2/docs
> HTTP/1.1" s:302 l:- S:TLSv1.2 C:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
> [07/Oct/2019:12:30:47 +0200] [20 ms] 160.46.219.110 - "GET /cb2/docs/
> HTTP/1.1" s:200 l:6367 S:TLSv1.2 C:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
>
&
; [07/Oct/2019:12:30:47 +0200] [2 ms] 160.46.219.110 - "POST /cb2/docs
> HTTP/1.1" s:302 l:- S:TLSv1.2 C:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
> [07/Oct/2019:12:30:47 +0200] [20 ms] 160.46.219.110 - "GET /cb2/docs/
> HTTP/1.1" s:200 l:6367 S:TLSv1.2 C:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
&g
l info
JkWatchdogInterval 60
And then later inside a virtual host:
#
# CB2 - Portal
#
# Mount the "/cb2" application to worker "cb2"
#
JkMount /cb2/* cb2
#
# Unmount "/cb2/docs" from worker "cb2" to allow static content
# beeing served by apache. Sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Bill,
On 10/5/15 3:21 PM, Bill Ross wrote:
> Is it possible to set up a site so that you have to log in to
> access the site at all, either the static content or the servlet
> interface? I have in mind 10-100 users. It seems a simple set
> From: Bill Ross [mailto:r...@cgl.ucsf.edu]
> Subject: configuring login for static content and Servlets
> Is it possible to set up a site so that you have to log in to access the site
> at all,
> either the static content or the servlet interface?
Read the "Specifying
Is it possible to set up a site so that you have to log in to access the site
at all, either the static content or the servlet interface? I have in mind
10-100 users. It seems a simple setup like .htaccess (httpd only?) would be
perfect if it existed and covered static and servlet. Is this
2013/2/11 Thierens, Bart :
> The files are located under $WEBAPP$/styles.
Move them into $WEBAPP$/static/styles.
>
> As I said on StackOverflow: the webapps are identical (except for database
> connection and tomcat version).
>
> My question for you is: what changed between version 6.0.29 and 6.
Users List
Subject: Re: (almost) identical webapps behave differently in serving static
content
2013/2/11 Thierens, Bart :
> I have 2 (almost) identical webapps. One is deployed to Tomcat 6.0.29 and
> the other is deployed to 6.0.33. The first one has no problems resolving
> static
2013/2/11 Thierens, Bart :
> I have 2 (almost) identical webapps. One is deployed to Tomcat 6.0.29 and
> the other is deployed to 6.0.33. The first one has no problems resolving
> static content files using Spring, the second one (on 6.0.33) has issues.
>
> For the full inf
I have 2 (almost) identical webapps. One is deployed to Tomcat 6.0.29 and the
other is deployed to 6.0.33. The first one has no problems resolving static
content files using Spring, the second one (on 6.0.33) has issues.
For the full info, see:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14812919
om: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 6:30 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Help Linking Static Content In a WebApp before and after (6.0.30.x)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russel,
On 6/6/12 8:45 AM, Morgan, Russel wrote:
I think I've gotten lost... what are you actually trying to
accomplish, here? Do you have a bunch of static content that is
outside of the webapp's docBase that you want to serve from within its
URL space? Any possibility that you could upgrade to Tomcat 7 which
has "aliases" wh
Again
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 4:49 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Help Linking Static Content In a WebApp before and after (6.0.30.x)
2012/6/6 Morgan, Russel :
>
> What I don't know h
2012/6/6 Morgan, Russel :
>
> What I don't know how to do is use that redirect filter/rewrite to change the
> url based on the version of tomcat, which it seems I need to do, since the
> container pathing logic changed across versions.
Do not use your trick of mapping DefaultServlet to wrong pat
@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 5:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Help Linking Static Content In a WebApp before and after (6.0.30.x)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russel,
On 6/5/12 8:38 PM, Morgan, Russel wrote:
> I was initially pretty excited about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russel,
On 6/5/12 8:38 PM, Morgan, Russel wrote:
> I was initially pretty excited about the URL redirect idea, but
> after some testing, it has led me back to the same result.
>
> I can make it work with redirects on either version of tomcat.
> Pre a
Russel Morgan
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 1:05 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Help Linking Static Content In a WebApp before and after (6.0.30.x)
2012/6/5 Morgan, Russel :
> Thanks yes that is the chang
I was optimistic on a first look into that URL-Rewriter
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 1:05 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Help Linking Static Content In a WebApp before and after (6.0.30.x)
2012/6/5
2012/6/5 Morgan, Russel :
> Thanks yes that is the change that caused this issue with how we use static
> content.
>
> I am not sure how I mangled my formatting but I went through and cleaned it
> up, I hope that helps readability.
>
> Russ
>
>
>
Thanks yes that is the change that caused this issue with how we use static
content.
I am not sure how I mangled my formatting but I went through and cleaned it up,
I hope that helps readability.
Russ
Issue formatting recap below:
=
Tomcat Users:
Has anyone found a
2012/6/5 Morgan, Russel :
> Tomcat Users:
>
>
>
> Has anyone found a graceful way to handle static content linking that works=
> both pre and post the the following change?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D50026
You mean
https://issues.apache.org/
Tomcat Users:
Has anyone found a graceful way to handle static content linking that works=
both pre and post the the following change?
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D50026
We have quite a few customers on earlier versions of Tomcat 6 as well as ne= w
customers
On 09/02/2012 06:19, sanu wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. I have a global web.xml, where the DefaultServlet is
> mapped.
>
> The difference I see is that my static resources are not in the same
> directory as the host's appBase. Could this be the problem ? How can the
> s
Thanks for your reply. I have a global web.xml, where the DefaultServlet is
mapped.
The difference I see is that my static resources are not in the same
directory as the host's appBase. Could this be the problem ? How can the
static content be served in such a case ?
--
View this messa
2012/2/8 sanu :
> Thank you.
>
> I just did that. Here's what I have :
>
> StandardContext context = (StandardContext)
> tomcat.addContext(null, "", directory");
>
> This doesn't seem to work.
>
>(...)
I would guess that you have not created nor mapped the DefaultServlet
instance
this context
but this is not. You are not really telling us anything.
In addition to not being able to access the resources from any other
context, I am unable to access the static content directly as well. Gives me
a 404.
Re-read Mark's previous post, and read the document he pointed y
, I am unable to access the static content directly as well. Gives me
a 404.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Serving-static-content-using-embedded-tomcat-7-tp4375155p4375303.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On 08/02/2012 08:40, sanu wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> I just did that. Here's what I have :
>
> StandardContext context = (StandardContext)
> tomcat.addContext(null, "", directory");
>
> This doesn't seem to work.
You haven't told us:
- exact Apache Tomcat version
- what the path
Thank you.
I just did that. Here's what I have :
StandardContext context = (StandardContext)
tomcat.addContext(null, "", http://tomcat.10.n6.nabble.com/Serving-static-content-using-embedded-tomcat-7-tp4375155p4375268.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing
On 08/02/2012 07:47, sanu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on embedding tomcat 7 into our application. We have a number of
> web apps and the static content is located in a different directory, common
> to all webapps.
Why not just serve the static content as it's own appli
Hello,
I am working on embedding tomcat 7 into our application. We have a number of
web apps and the static content is located in a different directory, common
to all webapps.
I am not finding a way to serve this static content. Could somebody please
help me out.
Thanks,
Sandhya
--
View this
And if I want to cache a protected resource only locally what I should do?
Thanks
2012/1/20
> Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >If the static content is not protected then by default it is cached and
> >the
> >corresponding headers are set - see scre
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 15:05, wrote:
> Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>
[...]
>>My question is why the expires header is set with this value? Doesn't
>>this
>>prevent caching?
>
> Yes. That is the point.
>
But there is no need for an expires header if you don't want caching.
It is enough to "Cache-c
Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>Hi,
>
>If the static content is not protected then by default it is cached and
>the
>corresponding headers are set - see screenshot1 & screenshot2.
>but when I put it as protected content the following headers are set:
>Cache-control:private an
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 14:03, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If the static content is not protected then by default it is cached and the
> corresponding headers are set - see screenshot1 & screenshot2.
> but when I put it as protected content the following heade
On 14/01/2012 03:52, Eric P wrote:
> I remember now why static content works for my ROOT app. I have
> Apache aliases set-up pointing to specific system directories for all
> static content.
>
> For example, I have all images for the ROOT app aliased here.
> Alias /img /opt/to
On 14.01.2012 04:17, Eric P wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having trouble getting Apache to serve static content (jpg, css, js, etc.)
for Tomcat apps via mod_jk for any
application except the ROOT Tomcat app. The ROOT app shows static content just
fine.
I have the following Apache settings attem
Eric P wrote:
I remember now why static content works for my ROOT app. I have
Apache aliases set-up pointing to specific system directories for all
static content.
For example, I have all images for the ROOT app aliased here.
Alias /img /opt/tomcat7/webapps/ROOT/img
Options Indexes
Have you measured that Tomcat is too slow for you to serve static content? If
not - serve everything from Tomcat itself and enjoy simple configuration;-)
--
Sent from my wireless G705 device
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users
I remember now why static content works for my ROOT app. I have
Apache aliases set-up pointing to specific system directories for all
static content.
For example, I have all images for the ROOT app aliased here.
Alias /img /opt/tomcat7/webapps/ROOT/img
Options Indexes MultiViews
Hi all,
I'm having trouble getting Apache to serve static content (jpg, css, js, etc.)
for Tomcat apps via mod_jk for any
application except the ROOT Tomcat app. The ROOT app shows static content just
fine.
I have the following Apache settings attempting to point *all* requests to
Tomca
On 15/06/2011 13:41, Flaherty, Brennen F wrote:
> we have an application that works as expected on tomcat version 6.0.29 on a
> windows server . If I try to copy the war to a machine running version 6.0.32
> none of the static content will display. If I copy the war file to a
&g
2011/6/15 Flaherty, Brennen F :
> we have an application that works as expected on tomcat version 6.0.29 on a
> windows server . If I try to copy the war to a machine running version 6.0.32
> none of the static content will display. If I copy the war file to a
> different machine
we have an application that works as expected on tomcat version 6.0.29 on a
windows server . If I try to copy the war to a machine running version 6.0.32
none of the static content will display. If I copy the war file to a different
machine with version 6.0.29 installed the static content
You might serve static resources with Apache/nginx/haproxy. This has also
the advantage that you save threads in tomcat.
Cheers,
Martin
Am 23.02.2011 14:47 schrieb "Reinwald Warapen" :
Hey,
Is there any way I can specify the expiry of static content (js,css etc) by
some sett
>
> Is there any way I can specify the expiry of static content (js,css etc) by
> some setting in the context.xml or sever.xml .Or the only way to achieve
> this is to write my own filter which will add the appropriate header.
>
We used this http://www.vineetmanohar.com/2010/10/j
Hey,
Is there any way I can specify the expiry of static content (js,css etc)
by some setting in the context.xml or sever.xml .Or the only way to
achieve this is to write my own filter which will add the appropriate
header.
Thanks
What are your evidences?
Note that, because of those anti** options in your Context, your
content is copied to some temporary directory and is served from there
and not from webapp/.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
Hi Konstantin, using *only* the cachingAllowed attribute is finally
working. I
I simply changed a static HTML file. I haven't tried disabling all the
other options though. Thanks for the hint.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2010/10/28 Alexander Rosemann :
>> Hi,
>>
>> For some reason Tomcat keeps caching my static co
2010/10/28 Alexander Rosemann :
> Hi,
>
> For some reason Tomcat keeps caching my static content even though I've set
> the cachingAllowed attribute to false. I've set the following attributes in
> %CATALINA_HOME%\conf\Catalina\localhost\myContext.xml:
>
> cros
Hi,
For some reason Tomcat keeps caching my static content even though I've
set the cachingAllowed attribute to false. I've set the following
attributes in %CATALINA_HOME%\conf\Catalina\localhost\myContext.xml:
crossContext="false" antiJARLocking="true" antiRe
Uh..thanks..it was not a good day when I asked this question. My apologies :)
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:03 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Caching of static content
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John,
On 8/2/2010 2:06 PM, john.rana...@thomsonreuters.com wrote:
> Can someone point me to the documentation on how to handle caching of
> static content? Images and static HTML documents are all being returned
> without cach-control
Can someone point me to the documentation on how to handle caching of
static content? Images and static HTML documents are all being returned
without cach-control response headers but I am unsure how to set these
values. Thus the files are being retrieved each and every time.
Also, how to
On 19/02/2010 07:09, petr kalafatič wrote:
Hi,
I have problem to configure apache and tomcat (ajp13).
I have several virtual hosts (php,jsp). PHP pages are ok, but jsp shows static
(html) content only.
Someone encountered this problem?
Yes, people who incorrectly configure the Apache document
Hi,
I have problem to configure apache and tomcat (ajp13).
I have several virtual hosts (php,jsp). PHP pages are ok, but jsp shows static
(html) content only.
Someone encountered this problem?
Any suggestion ?
Thanks, Petr
(apache 2.2, tomcat 6, win xp)
--
http://onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2004/03/03/filters.html
-Original Message-
From: pieroxy [mailto:pier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:03 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Expiration date on static content?
Hello,
I do have a tomcat working for several years on my
Hello,
I do have a tomcat working for several years on my production servers, and I
am trying to optimize a thing or two. I already use the gzip compression,
and this works very well.
However, I noticed that all my static content is served with no expiration
date at all. This doesn't
t: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkolXksACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBSKgCgimJQlCRi6eab/xsEfVE/3GrC
> OQMAn2wBeSJzFWdJEL0nw+oG/IyZsO5J
> =M+P4
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> --
I noticed that if the uri was such that TC would interpret it as
> "static content" like /foobar.html - I would get a 404 on the first request.
> If the uri refers to more dynamic content such as /foobar.jsp - you don't
> get a 404.
Let's see your code...
> pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 5/25/2009 1:30 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Caldarale, Charles R
>> Subject: RE: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [more
>> results]
>
> There are some extracts from the 2007 O&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
The message below was garbled when sent. Fortunately, it ended up being
preserved correctly in my sent message folder. Here it is.
- -chris
- Original Message
Subject: Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance
> From: Caldarale, Charles R
> Subject: RE: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [more
> results]
There are some extracts from the 2007 O'Reilly Tomcat book about benchmarking
on somewhat newer hardware than Chris is using:
http://www.devshed.com/c/b/BrainDump/
T
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Subject: Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [more
> results]
>
> Chris, there's something wrong with this post.
You have to use lemon juice and a heat source to read it...
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY
Christopher Schultz wrote:
Chris, there's something wrong with this post.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
binfqTJI0hlYT.bin
Description: PGP/MIME version identification
Actually, I was thinking more of disabling the AccessLog in httpd, to
see how much impact that had.
(That's also less additional tests to run ;-))
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 5/19/2009 2:28 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Christopher Schultz w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 5/19/2009 2:28 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Christopher Schultz wrote:
> ...
> Thanks for the work. At least it may put to rest some gross
> misconceptions.
>
> Now just a question : in the httpd tests, did you have an AccessLog
> enabled ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gregor,
On 5/19/2009 12:59 PM, Gregor Schneider wrote:
> I'm a bit puzzled:
>
> In your previous tests it looked like that Apache is "outperforming"
> (ok, not really) Coyote w APR when the files grew bigger.
I disagree with that conclusion. My inte
Christopher Schultz wrote:
...
Thanks for the work. At least it may put to rest some gross misconceptions.
Now just a question : in the httpd tests, did you have an AccessLog
enabled ? I would imagine you did not have an AccessLogValve enabled in
Tomcat, and I wonder if it makes any practical
> From: Caldarale, Charles R
> Subject: RE: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [some
> results]
>
> > In your last results I can't see that pattern - actually, I don't see
> > /any/ pattern...
>
> Quantum mechanics?
More seriously, we may
> From: Gregor Schneider [mailto:rc4...@googlemail.com]
> Subject: Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [some
> results]
>
> In your last results I can't see that pattern - actually, I don't see
> /any/ pattern...
Quantum mechanics?
- Chuck
TH
I'm a bit puzzled:
In your previous tests it looked like that Apache is "outperforming"
(ok, not really) Coyote w APR when the files grew bigger.
In your last results I can't see that pattern - actually, I don't see
/any/ pattern...
Any idea how come?
Cheers
Gregor
--
just because your parano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
So, I have some data from last night. It's about what you'd expect,
except that the NIO+sendfile connector test failed most of the time: the
client got something like "apr_connect: Connection reset by peer" when
it tried to connect to the server.
Hi,
I was trying to create a Filter that generates the some content as files (if
required) into the file system and lets the default servlet handle the rest.
However I noticed that if the uri was such that TC would interpret it as
"static content" like /foobar.html - I would get a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 5/18/2009 4:56 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> You say you ran each test for 10 seconds, so I guess the numbers are not
> the seconds it took, so what are they ?
They are transfer Rate (KiB/sec) as measured by ApacheBench.
> I also wonder about
Chris, what do the numbers represent ?
You say you ran each test for 10 seconds, so I guess the numbers are not
the seconds it took, so what are they ?
I also wonder about the numbers, for example in the first column
(httpd). They seem to grow more or less lineraly as the file size
increase
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 5/18/2009 4:40 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> Subject: Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance
>> [Revised/Updated]
>>
>&
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance
> [Revised/Updated]
>
> After reading some of your feedback, I've decided to make some changes:
>
> - - Using TC 6.0.18 exclusively
> From: Robin Wilson [mailto:rwil...@kingsisle.com]
> Subject: RE: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content
> performance[Revised/Updated]
>
> I don't know if I'd call a 4% difference a "dead heat"...
Given the likely variability of any measurements taken in an 8
le Entertainment, Inc.
> WORK: 512-623-5913
> CELL: 512-426-3929
> www.KingsIsle.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:25 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Apach
Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:25 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [Revised/Updated]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin,
On 5/18/2009 4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin,
On 5/18/2009 4:11 PM, Robin Wilson wrote:
> Thanks! This information isn't useless... Of course, more detailed
> results, after a longer test run would be more conclusive.
Yup, that's the plan. Tonight, I'll be running with an 8 minute test to
to:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 2:31 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [Revised/Updated]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
After reading some of your feedback, I've decided to make some changes:
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
After reading some of your feedback, I've decided to make some changes:
- - Using TC 6.0.18 exclusively instead of 5.5
- - Using tcnative 1.1.16 instead of 1.1.12
- - Using httpd 2.2.11 instead of 2.2.10
- - Running tests for a certain amount of
01060/chapter/ch04.pdf - a benchmark with
smaller files and concurrent users. This benchmark has the # of worker
threads match the # of concurrent users. But I've seen benchmarks where NIO
/ APR beat out the JIO connector when using fewer threads than the # of
concurrent requests - APR / NIO have
Peter Crowther wrote:
...
As a rough first cut, vmstat 5 and watch the numbers ;-). iostat too, if you
can. If CPU isn't pegged at 100% and the disk isn't at full capacity, that's
an interesting result as it implies the box has spare capacity and there's
contention elsewhere - often lock co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin,
On 5/18/2009 11:35 AM, Robin Wilson wrote:
> I'm curious by your comment that Coyote/APR is performing on par with
> httpd, from the results in your first message I saw it was a pretty
> big difference. Or are you saying that wasn't using APR?
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
