-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gregor,
On 5/19/2009 12:59 PM, Gregor Schneider wrote: > I'm a bit puzzled: > > In your previous tests it looked like that Apache is "outperforming" > (ok, not really) Coyote w APR when the files grew bigger. I disagree with that conclusion. My interpretation of the previous results is that Coyote+sendfile was performing on-par with httpd. /Some/ of the samples show that Coyote pumps bytes faster than httpd (in both my quickie results from yesterday as well as my full results from last night's real test) but most show that httpd outperforms Coyote+sendfile by a few percent. > In your last results I can't see that pattern - actually, I don't see > /any/ pattern... What pattern were you hoping for? One connector that definitively beats the others in all scenarios? That's just wishful thinking, especially since httpd and Coyote+sendfile are running the /same code/. It /should/ be a dead heat! - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkoS+xIACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBYxgCdGzvf2IGVE6hymvh081QV+imH QWAAn3szhqSZhyE7vNpEbJHWDgXIJPsh =H0cF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
