mod_jk.so does not build for 32-bit on 64-bit Linux

2016-07-25 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, I've to build Apache (...) and mod_jk on a 64-bit SuSE Linux, but for 32-bit. While a lot of OpenSource packages, including Apache httpd-2.4.18, are building fine, the tomcat_connector-1.2.41 is unwilling to create the mod_jk.so file. The full configure and build log follows. What

Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-15 Thread Mark Eggers
- Original Message - > From: "Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2" > > To: Tomcat Users List ; Mark Eggers > > Cc: > Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 7:53 AM > Subject: RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x > > There is no "apxs"

RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-15 Thread Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
2011 1:22 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x - Original Message - > From: "Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2" > > To: Tomcat Users List > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:08 AM > Subject: RE: Binary of

Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-15 Thread Rainer Jung
On 15.07.2011 14:20, Jeff Allison wrote: > Isn't mod_jk deprecated in favour of mod_ajp. No Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-15 Thread Jeff Allison
fferent thread with this. Thanks again! > > Jonathan > > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 2:37 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x >

RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-15 Thread Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
ubject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan, On 7/14/2011 1:08 PM, Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote: > Chris, something DID just dawn on me... > > I have my own account on that Linux server, though not wit

Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-15 Thread André Warnier
For both threads : Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x and mod_jk under RedHat ? Here is apparently the deal with mod_jk and Redhat (quoted from my competent sysadmin) : In the RedHat product "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server" (RHELS), there is no repository containing a pre-packa

Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Leon Kolchinsky
hristopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 12:34 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Leon, > > On 7/12/2011 7:42 PM, Leon Kolchinsky

Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Eggers
- Original Message - > From: Christopher Schultz > To: Tomcat Users List > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 11:36 AM > Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jonathan, > &g

Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Christopher Schultz
le for me to compile mod_jk.so > into my own space and then tell him where the mod_jk.so is? Yes. > If so, would the following steps be how I would generate mod_jk.so > (and forgive the "newbie"ness of the question, please)? > > tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.ta

Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread André Warnier
André Warnier wrote: Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote: André, if you would be so kind as to let me know what you find, I would greatly appreciate it. I will watch the other thread, too. :) Well, according to the one and the same Mark Eggers who also provided your last resp

Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread André Warnier
Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote: André, if you would be so kind as to let me know what you find, I would greatly appreciate it. I will watch the other thread, too. :) Well, according to the one and the same Mark Eggers who also provided your last response, the answer seems

RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x As things happen, I am just in the process of trying to locate a RedHat mod_jk package for a client of mine, whose admin also does not seem to find it in RHEL6. See the other thread entitled "mod_jk under RedHat ?" for some recent interesti

Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread André Warnier
As things happen, I am just in the process of trying to locate a RedHat mod_jk package for a client of mine, whose admin also does not seem to find it in RHEL6. See the other thread entitled "mod_jk under RedHat ?" for some recent interesting answers. --

Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Eggers
- Original Message - > From: "Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2" > > To: Tomcat Users List > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:08 AM > Subject: RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x > > Chris, something DID just dawn on me...

RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
Chris, something DID just dawn on me... I have my own account on that Linux server, though not with root access or anything. Would it be possible for me to compile mod_jk.so into my own space and then tell him where the mod_jk.so is? If so, would the following steps be how I would generate

RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
I was hoping to avoid having to learn how to do his job FOR him. :-D JL -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 12:34 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x -BEGIN PGP

Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-14 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Leon, On 7/12/2011 7:42 PM, Leon Kolchinsky wrote: > Go to http://tomcat.apache.org/download-connectors.cgi and download > the source code: > > # tar -xvzf tomcat-connectors-1.2.30-src.tar.gz > > Read docs/webserver_howto/apache.html or native/BUILD

Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-12 Thread Leon Kolchinsky
- > From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 2:12 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x > > Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote: > > I don't know the first thing about compiling o

RE: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-12 Thread Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
Thanks for the reply, André. It is Red Hat Linux. -Original Message- From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 2:12 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote: > I do

Re: Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-12 Thread André Warnier
Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2 wrote: I don't know the first thing about compiling on Linux. I just want to drop a compiled mod_jk.so into the modules directory. Where can I find the binary, not the source? Thanks! What "kind" of Linux ? explanat

Binary of mod_jk.so for Apache 2.2.x

2011-07-12 Thread Leffingwell, Jonathan R CTR FRCSE, JAX 7.2.2
I don't know the first thing about compiling on Linux. I just want to drop a compiled mod_jk.so into the modules directory. Where can I find the binary, not the source? Thanks! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Need Help to configure Apache Tomcat with mod_jk.so

2011-05-10 Thread Christopher Schultz
ot; Why do you have "request.tomcatAuthentication" here? What version of Tomcat are you running? > workersConfig="C:/Program Files/Apache Software > Foundation/Apache2.2/conf/jk/workers.properties" > mod_Jk ="C:/Program Files/Apache Software > Found

Re: Need Help to configure Apache Tomcat with mod_jk.so

2011-05-10 Thread jatinder singh
error.log shows [Tue May 10 21:11:00 2011] [warn] RSA server certificate CommonName (CN) ` www.abc.com' does NOT match server name!? [Tue May 10 21:11:00 2011] [warn] pid file C:/Program Files/Apache Software Foundation/Apache2.2/logs/httpd.pid overwritten -- Unclean shutdown of previous Apache ru

Re: Need Help to configure Apache Tomcat with mod_jk.so

2011-05-10 Thread Mark Thomas
On 10/05/2011 16:52, jatinder singh wrote: > No sir its still not working. Apache gives me same error. > > Anything you want me to change in any file. Have you looked in the error log? Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-uns

Re: Need Help to configure Apache Tomcat with mod_jk.so

2011-05-10 Thread jatinder singh
with SSL. > > I want to Integrate both using mod_jk.so, for that i have followed all > the > > instruction but when i start Apache i got the message - The requested > > operation has failed. > > > > My httpd.conf file is > > > > > >LoadModu

Re: Need Help to configure Apache Tomcat with mod_jk.so

2011-05-10 Thread János Löbb
On May 10, 2011, at 9:28 AM, jatinder singh wrote: > Hi > I have configured Apache and Tomcat with SSL. > I want to Integrate both using mod_jk.so, for that i have followed all the > instruction but when i start Apache i got the message - The requested > operation has failed. >

Need Help to configure Apache Tomcat with mod_jk.so

2011-05-10 Thread jatinder singh
Hi I have configured Apache and Tomcat with SSL. I want to Integrate both using mod_jk.so, for that i have followed all the instruction but when i start Apache i got the message - The requested operation has failed. My httpd.conf file is LoadModulejk_module modules/mod_jk.so

Re: Steps to build mod_jk.so

2009-02-05 Thread Christopher Schultz
the - --with-apxs for your Apache installation makes sure that mod_jk is built appropriately for your Apache version and configuration. > So, that while starting apache with the following configured in the > httpd.conf: > > ----

Re: Steps to build mod_jk.so

2009-02-05 Thread Gregor Schneider
Rhandir, after you've downloaded the source of mod_jk and extracting them, you'll find a file there "BUILD.txt". = [ extract ] === For the impatient Apache admins: $> cd native $> ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs (or where ever the apxs/apxs2 is) $> make $> su -c 'make install'

Steps to build mod_jk.so

2009-02-04 Thread randhir . singh
is what I could make of the documentation? So, that while starting apache with the following configured in the httpd.conf: --- LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so JkWorkersFile /usr/local/apache1.3/conf

Re: Meaning of LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so in httpd.conf

2009-02-04 Thread Gregor Schneider
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:01 PM, wrote: > Thanks, for your answer. But, I could not understand how to make the > module mod_jk.so so that it gets placed in the path $APACHE_HOME/libexec > as the documents you mentioned are not very clear on that. > In your 1st post above you wrote:

RE: Meaning of LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so in httpd.conf

2009-02-04 Thread randhir . singh
Thanks, for your answer. But, I could not understand how to make the module mod_jk.so so that it gets placed in the path $APACHE_HOME/libexec as the documents you mentioned are not very clear on that. regards -Original Message- From: Gregor Schneider [mailto:rc4...@googlemail.com] Sent

Re: Meaning of LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so in httpd.conf

2009-02-04 Thread Gregor Schneider
well, well, well, seems you're becoming a running gag here in the list. did your read http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/ as I suggested previously? if so, did you *understand* it? if even so, did you find the link within the document pointing to http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webs

Meaning of LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so in httpd.conf

2009-02-04 Thread randhir . singh
I have seen the following set of statements in APACHE_HOME/conf/httpd.conf file,$ LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so JkWorkersFile /usr/local/apache1.3/conf/workers.properties JkLogFile /usr/local/apache1.3/logs

Re: Problem mod_jk.so (1.2.26) 100% process (Tomcat 5.5.26 + Apache 2.2.9)

2008-06-22 Thread Rainer Jung
Estevam Henrique Portela Mota e Silva schrieb: Hi, Install -> Apache 2.2.9 (ok!), Tomcat 5.5.26 (ok!) e JDK 1.5.0_15 *Entered link with the Tomcat happened was that "Tomcat5.exe" has process is 100%. It is the problem MSVCRT.dll* * Details MSVCRT.dll* Tamanho: 335 KB (343.040 bytes) Versão: 7

Problem mod_jk.so (1.2.26) 100% process (Tomcat 5.5.26 + Apache 2.2.9)

2008-06-22 Thread Estevam Henrique Portela Mota e Silva
Hi, Install -> Apache 2.2.9 (ok!), Tomcat 5.5.26 (ok!) e JDK 1.5.0_15 when I set simple in Apache: *httpd.conf* Include conf/tomcat.conf * tomcat.conf* LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk-1.2.26-httpd-2.2.4.so JkWorkersFile "E:/WebServer/Apache-2.2.9/conf/workers.properties" JkShmFile "E:/WebSer

Re: Building mod_jk.so module

2007-12-03 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shekar, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We are trying to build module which under apache named mod_jk.so. > document points to compiling it with build-unix.sh script which is not > there. Any idea how to compile /build it ? Thx Which vers

Building mod_jk.so module

2007-12-03 Thread Shekhar . Dhotre
Ola, We are trying to build module which under apache named mod_jk.so. document points to compiling it with build-unix.sh script which is not there. Any idea how to compile /build it ? Thx [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local]: find / -name build-unix.sh -print find: bad status-- /proc/381108

mod_jk.so Linux version 1.2.1

2007-06-27 Thread yojimbo
Hi, Noticed that the mod_jk.so binary for Linux is version 1.2.0 and not 1.2.1? I've downloaded it from the download page http://apache.leakage.org/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/linux/jk-1.2.21/ Checked the version using "strings mod_jk.so" If I'm wrong, please

Re: Help with mod_jk.so errno=13

2007-05-13 Thread Martin Gainty
. Thank you. - Original Message - From: "ewsinc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 6:56 PM Subject: Re: Help with mod_jk.so errno=13 I had this same problem ... see recent post about tracing down errors in the ajp-8009 part of the manager/status pa

Re: Help with mod_jk.so errno=13

2007-05-12 Thread ewsinc
error. It > looks like a shared memory error. > Any help would be appreciated in this regard. > > I have been working on this all day researching without any progress. > > Thanks in Advance. > > > -Mukarram Syed. > > -- View this message in conte

Re: How to retrieve mod_jk version from mod_jk.so?

2006-11-07 Thread Rainer Jung
... and also: strings ./native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.so|grep mod_jk/ mod_jk/1.2.19 mod_jk/1.2.19 I didn't check with 1.2.15, but at least for 1.2.19 this is a solaris build for Apache 2.2 and your method works. Maybe your file is corrupt? Regards, Rainer Mladen Turk schrieb: > Fan, To

Re: How to retrieve mod_jk version from mod_jk.so?

2006-11-07 Thread Mladen Turk
Fan, Tony wrote: I am using jk version 1.2.15. Is there a way to get version information just from mod_jk.so? Set JkLogLevel debug ... and you will have the line in the modjk.log after starting httpd in the form: [debug] mod_jk.c (2410): Initialized mod_jk/1.2.20-dev Regards, Mladen

How to retrieve mod_jk version from mod_jk.so?

2006-11-07 Thread Fan, Tony
Hi, I used to get version information very easily from mod_jk.so in Solaris system by typing "strings /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so | egrep mod_jk/" when I compiled jk module with Apache 2.0, after I switched to Apache2.2 and the mod_jk.so build base on Apache2.2 does

Re: mod_jk.so

2006-09-20 Thread Mark Thomas
When starting a new thread (ie sending a message to the list about a new topic) please do not reply to an existing message and change the subject line. To many of the list archiving services and mail clients used by list subscribers this makes your new message appear as part of the old thread. Thi

Re: mod_jk.so

2006-09-20 Thread Martin Gainty
copy. Thank you. - Original Message - From: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" ; "Martin Gainty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 3:38 PM Subject: Re: mod_jk.so > Yes as a matter of fact. However I s

Re: mod_jk.so

2006-09-20 Thread Brian
Thank you. > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Users List" > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:31 PM > Subject: mod_jk.so > > > > Hello All, > > I'm looking fo

Re: mod_jk.so

2006-09-20 Thread Martin Gainty
o: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:31 PM Subject: mod_jk.so > Hello All, > I'm looking for some insite into the mod_jk. > We have an apache web server on the outside, a > firewall and jboss on the inside (windows machines). > > I

mod_jk.so

2006-09-20 Thread Brian
Hello All, I'm looking for some insite into the mod_jk. We have an apache web server on the outside, a firewall and jboss on the inside (windows machines). I'm trying to configure mod_jk , however it's begining to look fruitless(sorry, just been trying this for a few days). Anyway, mod_jk

Re: mod_jk.so problems going from Apache 2.0.55 to Apache 2.2.2

2006-07-21 Thread Mladen Turk
Sant wrote: Can any one of you send me the copy of mod_jk.so for windows for apache2.2.2. my email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks. http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/win32/ Regards, Mladen. - To start a new topic, e-mail

Re: mod_jk.so problems going from Apache 2.0.55 to Apache 2.2.2

2006-07-21 Thread Sant
Can any one of you send me the copy of mod_jk.so for windows for apache2.2.2. my email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks. sanjeev -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk.so-problems-going-from-Apache-2.0.55-to-Apache-2.2.2-tf1660137.html#a5437728 Sent from the Tomcat

Re: mod_jk.so problems going from Apache 2.0.55 to Apache 2.2.2

2006-06-26 Thread harold62
please could you send me a copy of this file my email is [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk.so-problems-going-from-Apache-2.0.55-to-Apache-2.2.2-t1660137.html#a5048166 Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com

Re: mod_jk.so problems going from Apache 2.0.55 to Apache 2.2.2

2006-06-26 Thread jiawei24
could you send me a copy too ? thank you very much... My email is [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk.so-problems-going-from-Apache-2.0.55-to-Apache-2.2.2-t1660137.html#a5047839 Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com

Re: mod_jk.so problems going from Apache 2.0.55 to Apache 2.2.2

2006-06-19 Thread cmarkovitz
Could you please send me the copy of the recompiled mod_jk.so for 2.2.2 as well. thanks. my email is [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk.so-problems-going-from-Apache-2.0.55-to-Apache-2.2.2-t1660137.html#a4938861 Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at

Re: Where is mod_jk.so?

2006-06-13 Thread Edmon Begoli
Bradley, I may be wrong but I am not sure if your mod_jk actually got compiled. mod_jk.so should be placed where the rest of your modules are. Here is the description of the compilation process on Red Hat and where mod_jk.so should end up: http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/eai/software/archives

Where is mod_jk.so?

2006-06-13 Thread Mann, Bradley
mod_jk.so. How do I obtain this file? Thanks, Brad Mann Software Engineer - Information Access Services HARRIS Corporation / GCSD (321) 984-6292

RE: mod_jk.so problems going from Apache 2.0.55 to Apache 2.2.2

2006-05-30 Thread Fenlason, Josh
Any reason you can't use mod_proxy_ajp? I believe that is the recommended method with 2.2.x. , Josh. > -Original Message- > From: raorba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 7:18 PM > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: mod_jk.so proble

Re: mod_jk.so problems going from Apache 2.0.55 to Apache 2.2.2

2006-05-29 Thread raorba
Hey man Is it possible to you to send me a copy or your "brand new", recompiled mod_jk.so for 2.2.2? You will be think I'm lazy, but in fact I'm more a Linux boy than Windows boy and I don't know how use VC++ at all. My email is rafael_oropeza at hotmail.com Thank

Re: mod_jk.so problems going from Apache 2.0.55 to Apache 2.2.2

2006-05-21 Thread Philip Warne
Thanks, that's precisely what I did, i.e., recompiled mod_jk (with VC++ 2005). It's working now. Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Philip Warne" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >I have a working configuration of Apache & Tomcat using Apache 2.0.5

Re: mod_jk.so problems going from Apache 2.0.55 to Apache 2.2.2

2006-05-21 Thread Bill Barker
"Philip Warne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >I have a working configuration of Apache & Tomcat using Apache 2.0.55 with >mod_jk.so version 1.2.15. I have installed Apache version 2.2.2 and have >kept my existing mod_jk configuration,

mod_jk.so problems going from Apache 2.0.55 to Apache 2.2.2

2006-05-21 Thread Philip Warne
I have a working configuration of Apache & Tomcat using Apache 2.0.55 with mod_jk.so version 1.2.15. I have installed Apache version 2.2.2 and have kept my existing mod_jk configuration, i.e., I have copied mod_jk.so to the modules directory of the new installed Apache and have modified

RE: Help with mod_jk.so errno=2

2006-04-13 Thread Mukarram Syed
Hi, Any help on this would be appreciated. Thanks -Mukarram. -Original Message- From: Mukarram Syed Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 4:29 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: Help with mod_jk.so errno=2 Hi I am now getting an errn=2 [Wed Apr 12 19:20:36 2006] [14611:289

Help with mod_jk.so errno=2

2006-04-12 Thread Mukarram Syed
apache user. It does not create the jk-runtime-status file in /apache2 directory. Can anyone help. Thanks -Mukarram. -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 1:27 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Help with mod_jk.so errno=13 I

RE: Help with mod_jk.so errno=13

2006-04-11 Thread Mukarram Syed
Thanks Rainer Jung. I'll check that out and let you know. Regards -Mukarram. -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 1:27 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Help with mod_jk.so errno=13 I assume the line break was done b

Re: Help with mod_jk.so errno=13

2006-04-11 Thread Rainer Jung
I assume the line break was done by the mailer, so the path in the original log messages is /var/log/jk-runtime-status It tries to open such a file, so the user under which apache runs needs to have full access to /var/log and to /var/log/jk-runtime-status. Did you check the ownerships and p

Help with mod_jk.so errno=13

2006-04-10 Thread Mukarram Syed
Hi All, I know this has been asked before in the users group, but there are no solutions to this problem. I am getting the following error in my mod_jk.log file: Tue Apr 11 00:46:08 2006] [18962:20800] [error] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (2312): Attachning shm:/var/log/jk-run time-status errno=13

Re: Building mod_jk.so on AIX

2006-03-24 Thread Bernie Durfee
build mod_jk then. , Josh. -Original Message- From: Bernie Durfee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 12:41 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Building mod_jk.so on AIX I'm trying to build mod_jk.so on an AIX 5.3 server. I compiled and installed Apache 2.2.0. I run...

RE: Building mod_jk.so on AIX

2006-03-24 Thread Fenlason, Josh
h 24, 2006 12:41 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Building mod_jk.so on AIX > > I'm trying to build mod_jk.so on an AIX 5.3 server. I > compiled and installed Apache 2.2.0. I run... > > ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache-2.2.0/bin/apxs > > ...but it fails

Building mod_jk.so on AIX

2006-03-24 Thread Bernie Durfee
I'm trying to build mod_jk.so on an AIX 5.3 server. I compiled and installed Apache 2.2.0. I run... ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache-2.2.0/bin/apxs ...but it fails with the error... could not find /usr/local/apache-2.2.0/bin/apxs configure: error: You must specify a valid --with