Dhayalan,
On 7/14/23 01:42, Dhayalan Ganapathy wrote:
I am trying to migrate tomcat6 with the war to tomcat 9, but rmiclient
which is running in tomcat 6 not working in tomcat9.
Is rmiclient a component of your application, or something from a
third-party?
It throws an error unknown
Hi,
I am trying to migrate tomcat6 with the war to tomcat 9, but rmiclient
which is running in tomcat 6 not working in tomcat9.
It throws an error unknown protocol: war. Can you please help us to run
the application in tomcat 9?.
[image: cid:image004.jpg@01D9B641.52DEE890]
[image
Mark
Thanks for taking the time to help. Again, I appreciate it.
cjb> We are getting dinged by a vulnerability scan for the default
cjb> not-found error page being returned by Tomcat for a Status 404.
cjb> [...]
cjb> And we're using Tomcat 6.0.37 (ahem).
MT> And you are worried about returning
Leon, Mark, and Alejandro
Thanks for your time and suggestions. I appreciate it.
cjb> We are getting dinged by a vulnerability scan for the default
cjb> not-found error page being returned by Tomcat for a Status 404.
cjb> [...]
cjb> However, I can't find where the error-page for 404 is defined.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:01 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: tomcat 6 vulnerability scan default error page help
> On 02/05/18 20:51, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > I ag
You need to unpack catalina.jar in tomcat lib directory,
then go to org\apache\catalina\util\,
open ServerInfo.properties and edit it
server.info=Apache Tomcat
server.number=
server.built=
You need to set to empty these variables, as shown above.
Save the file.
Pack as jar again
Put in the tom
On 02/05/18 20:51, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I agree with you that the complaint about version number is rather a minor
> one, however, I've had the same situation as one of our projects had to
> pass through a PCI Compliance test, and this is what they really test for.
Don't get me st
Hi Mark,
I agree with you that the complaint about version number is rather a minor
one, however, I've had the same situation as one of our projects had to
pass through a PCI Compliance test, and this is what they really test for.
regards
Leon
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 02/05/18 20:27, Berneburg, Cris J. - US wrote:
> We are getting dinged by a vulnerability scan for the default not-found error
> page being returned by Tomcat for a Status 404.
>
> On my dev server when requesting an invalid URL, Tomcat returns a Status 404
> page that displays the Tomcat ver
Hi Cris,
try to add following to your web.xml
404
/error404.html
regards
Leon
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 9:27 PM, Berneburg, Cris J. - US wrote:
> We are getting dinged by a vulnerability scan for the default not-found
> error page being returned by Tomcat for a Status
We are getting dinged by a vulnerability scan for the default not-found error
page being returned by Tomcat for a Status 404.
On my dev server when requesting an invalid URL, Tomcat returns a Status 404
page that displays the Tomcat version. Right, I need to do something about
that.
However,
ge of the
> hardware as well (because why would you have installed this version on
> newer hardware, when newer releases existed)
>
> I'm assuming that you have enough aspects to inspect - if you're really
> interested in finding the root cause, you'll need to come u
'm assuming that this is the age of the hardware as
> well (because why would you have installed this version on newer hardware,
> when newer releases existed)
>
> I'm assuming that you have enough aspects to inspect - if you're really
> interested in finding the root cause,
ve enough aspects to inspect - if you're really
interested in finding the root cause, you'll need to come up with more
specific measurements, e.g. profiler data, compare thread dumps and set
up Tomcat 6 with Java 8 to have a third reference point.
Olaf
-
> > More heap or more native memory?
> >
>
> With the exact same Xms and Xmx settings, I get vastly different resident and
> virtual image sizes from the Linux ps command.
>
>
> tomcatA: jdk1.8.0_152, res: 694312, virt: 5045084
> tomcatB: jdk1.6.0_21, res: 332840, virt: 3922656
Op 23 dec. 2017 09:27 schreef "Johan Compagner" :
Op 22 dec. 2017 21:02 schreef "Eric Robinson" :
>
> More heap or more native memory?
>
With the exact same Xms and Xmx settings, I get vastly different resident
and virtual image sizes from the Linux ps command.
tomcatA: jdk1.8.0_152
Op 22 dec. 2017 21:02 schreef "Eric Robinson" :
>
> More heap or more native memory?
>
With the exact same Xms and Xmx settings, I get vastly different resident
and virtual image sizes from the Linux ps command.
tomcatA: jdk1.8.0_152, res: 694312, virt: 5045084
tomcatB: jdk1.6
mcat might have different default
thread pool sizes - I don't know if you explicitly configure them. And
I've lost track if the default connectors are different ones between
Tomcat 6 and 8, or if you have ex- or implicitly configured them
differently (e.g. through using your Linux dist
> Eric,
>
> Just curious how much ram do you have in the server and cpu resources.
>
> #free -m and # cat /proc/cpuinfo | egrep 'cores|processor'
>
> (Not to insult your intelligence , I am just specifying what I was curious to
> see)
>
> And it's always easier to copy/paste than to think.
>
: Eric Robinson [mailto:eric.robin...@psmnv.com]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2017 2:59 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Is it Normal for Tomcat 8 to Use 20-80% More Memory Than
Tomcat 6?
> > From: Eric Robinson [mailto:eric.robin...@psmnv.com]
> > Subject: RE: Is it Normal for Tomcat
>
> More heap or more native memory?
>
With the exact same Xms and Xmx settings, I get vastly different resident and
virtual image sizes from the Linux ps command.
tomcatA: jdk1.8.0_152, res: 694312, virt: 5045084
tomcatB: jdk1.6.0_21, res: 332840, virt: 3922656
--Eric
-
> > From: Eric Robinson [mailto:eric.robin...@psmnv.com]
> > Subject: RE: Is it Normal for Tomcat 8 to Use 20-80% More Memory Than
> Tomcat 6?
>
> > if JVM instance "A" is configured as follows on server 1 under tomcat6/jdk
> 1.6, then
> > instance &qu
> From: Eric Robinson [mailto:eric.robin...@psmnv.com]
> Subject: RE: Is it Normal for Tomcat 8 to Use 20-80% More Memory Than
Tomcat 6?
> if JVM instance "A" is configured as follows on server 1 under tomcat6/jdk
1.6, then
> instance "A" on server 2 is configure
, December 22, 2017 2:04 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Is it Normal for Tomcat 8 to Use 20-80% More Memory Than Tomcat
6?
> On 22.12.2017 13:48, Eric Robinson wrote:
> > We have multiple JVMs deployed on two identical Linux servers. Each server
> has 60 JVMs. Until today, both servers were running Tomcat6 with JDK 1.6.
> Today we upgraded one of the servers to Tomcat 8 with JDK 1.8. Now the JVMs
> on the Tomcat 8 serv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Eric,
On 12/22/17 7:48 AM, Eric Robinson wrote:
> We have multiple JVMs deployed on two identical Linux servers.
> Each server has 60 JVMs. Until today, both servers were running
> Tomcat6 with JDK 1.6. Today we upgraded one of the servers to
> Tomc
On 22.12.2017 13:48, Eric Robinson wrote:
We have multiple JVMs deployed on two identical Linux servers. Each server has
60 JVMs. Until today, both servers were running Tomcat6 with JDK 1.6. Today we
upgraded one of the servers to Tomcat 8 with JDK 1.8. Now the JVMs on the
Tomcat 8 server are
We have multiple JVMs deployed on two identical Linux servers. Each server has
60 JVMs. Until today, both servers were running Tomcat6 with JDK 1.6. Today we
upgraded one of the servers to Tomcat 8 with JDK 1.8. Now the JVMs on the
Tomcat 8 server are each using between 20-80% more memory than t
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 04:07:25PM +0530, Mohammad Nayeem wrote:
> We have installed apace and configured mod_jk connector along with a
> load-balancer for 2 tomcat servers.
>
> We were able to successfully start apache and we got the login page of our
> application hosted on it, but the functiona
e the exact same
functionality that we had without apache in the front?
Regards,
Mohammad Nayeem
-Original Message-
From: Olaf Kock [mailto:tom...@olafkock.de]
Sent: 31 May 2017 16:38
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: [External] Re: Security Headers Implementation in Tomcat 6.x
version
: Security Headers Implementation in Tomcat 6.x
version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mohammad,
On 6/1/17 12:43 AM, Shaik, Mohammad N. wrote:
> What should be name of the new JAR file that I would create for the
> Filter classes?
It doesn't matter.
> Ther
Ghgfhch
Dygugjfbjg
Envoyé de mon smartphone BlackBerry 10.
Message d'origine
De: Christopher Schultz
Envoyé: jeudi 8 juin 2017 18:43
À: users@tomcat.apache.org
Répondre à: Tomcat Users List
Objet: Re: [External] Re: Security Headers Implementation in Tomcat 6.x version
-BEGIN PGP S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Shaik,
On 6/8/17 1:18 AM, Shaik, Mohammad N. wrote:
> Hi Olaf & Chris,
>
> By placing HTTPD 2.x server in front of Tomcat 6, is it possible to
> hide Tomcat 6 from external world? I just don’t want people to find
> out that
Hi Olaf & Chris,
By placing HTTPD 2.x server in front of Tomcat 6, is it possible to hide Tomcat
6 from external world? I just don’t want people to find out that I am using
Tomcat 6, instead I want them to know that I am using httpd 2.x server. Is this
possible?
I just need Apache H
Am 02.06.2017 um 07:43 schrieb Shaik, Mohammad N.:
> Hi Chris, > > My actual requirement was to implement 7 HTTP headers, out of
> which
4 are implemented in "HttpHeaderSecurityFilter". The remaining 3 headers
(Content-Security-Policy, Public-Key-Pins, X-Robots-Tag) are not
addressed in any of t
versions.
Is there any way that we implement these 3 headers in Tomcat?
Regards,
Mohammad
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: 01 June 2017 19:59
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: Security Headers Implementation
e.
Remember: Upgrade ASAP.
- -chris
> -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz
> [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: 31 May 2017 23:52 To:
> users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: [External] Re: Security Headers
> Implementation in Tomcat 6.x version
>
> Mohammad,
&g
7 23:52
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: [External] Re: Security Headers Implementation in Tomcat 6.x version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mohammad,
On 5/31/17 6:37 AM, Shaik, Mohammad N. wrote:
> Can I simply use the JAR files from Tomcat 7 that contains executable
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mohammad,
On 5/31/17 6:37 AM, Shaik, Mohammad N. wrote:
> Can I simply use the JAR files from Tomcat 7 that contains
> executable code of filter classes (security headers), and put them
> into corresponding location in Tomcat 6?
Definit
Am 29.05.2017 um 13:34 schrieb Shaik, Mohammad N.:
> Hello Olaf,
>
> Thanks for your response!
>
> Based on your inputs, we are thinking to put Apache httpd in front of Tomcat
> 6 server, since our header configuration is going to be static.
>
> Can you please help us in i
Hi,
2017-05-31 13:37 GMT+03:00 Shaik, Mohammad N. <
mohammad.n.sh...@accenture.com>:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Can I simply use the JAR files from Tomcat 7 that contains executable
code of filter classes (security headers), and put them into corresponding
location in Tomcat 6?
I would
istopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: 30 May 2017 21:06
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Security Headers Implementation in Tomcat 6.x version
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Mohammad,
>
> On 5/30/17 2:13
Hi Chris,
Can I simply use the JAR files from Tomcat 7 that contains executable code of
filter classes (security headers), and put them into corresponding location in
Tomcat 6?
Regards,
Mohammad
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent
folder or under "WEB-INF" folder of my application?
Regards,
Mohammad
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: 30 May 2017 21:06
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Security Headers Implementation in Tomcat 6.x versio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mohammad,
On 5/30/17 2:13 AM, Shaik, Mohammad N. wrote:
> Thanks for the valuable input, that helps!! We shall go with
> getting the source package of Tomcat 7, put them in Tomcat 6 and
> use the filters of Tomcat 7 in Tomcat 6.
>
>
Hello Chris,
Thanks for the valuable input, that helps!! We shall go with getting the source
package of Tomcat 7, put them in Tomcat 6 and use the filters of Tomcat 7 in
Tomcat 6.
Can you please let me know from where I can get/download the source package of
Tomcat 7? Also can you please
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mohammad,
On 5/29/17 7:34 AM, Shaik, Mohammad N. wrote:
> Based on your inputs, we are thinking to put Apache httpd in front
> of Tomcat 6 server, since our header configuration is going to be
> static.
This might not be a bad idea for
Hello Olaf,
Thanks for your response!
Based on your inputs, we are thinking to put Apache httpd in front of Tomcat 6
server, since our header configuration is going to be static.
Can you please help us in identifying which version of Apache HTTP Server we
can use for Tomcat 6 version? Also
Am 29.05.2017 um 07:59 schrieb Shaik, Mohammad N.:
> We are using Tomcat 6.x version and we need to implement the following
> headers in our environment.
>
> Headers:
> 1) Strict-Transport-Security
> 2) Content-Security-Policy
>
> 7) X-Robots-Tag
>
> When
.
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Shaik, Mohammad N. <
mohammad.n.sh...@accenture.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone please let me know if the following headers are compatible
> with Tomcat 6.x version? If yes, then how do we enable them?
>
> Headers:
> 1) Strict-Tran
Hello,
Can someone please let me know if the following headers are compatible with
Tomcat 6.x version? If yes, then how do we enable them?
Headers:
1) Strict-Transport-Security
2) Content-Security-Policy
3) Public-Key-Pins
4) X-Frame-Options
5) X-XSS-Protection
6) X-Content-Type-Options
7) X
Hello,
We are using Tomcat 6.x version and we need to implement the following headers
in our environment.
Headers:
1) Strict-Transport-Security
2) Content-Security-Policy
3) Public-Key-Pins
4) X-Frame-Options
5) X-XSS-Protection
6) X-Content-Type-Options
7) X-Robots-Tag
When I checked the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vikas,
On 5/31/16 11:11 PM, vikas chandra yadav wrote:
> Hi, I am upgrading from tomcat 6 to tomcat 8. My throughput get
> decreased by 40%.
>
> Simple sending http request from jmeter using 40 threads. In tomcat
> 6 it is 11 i
Hi,
I am upgrading from tomcat 6 to tomcat 8.
My throughput get decreased by 40%.
Simple sending http request from jmeter using 40 threads.
In tomcat 6 it is 11
in tomcat 7(last version) it si 108000
in tomcat 8 - 8
Please suggest if we have to disable any auto enavle feature of do
Am 20.04.2016 um 12:55 schrieb Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi:
Yes I tried the NIO and NIO2 but not seen much difference. The TPS only
increased 3K with NIO2.
Can you try it with nio enabled in tomcat 6 and see, if that is slower,
too? Same with bio and tomcat 8 and see if it is better?
Regards
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 7:37 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
Ravi,
On 4/20/16 6:55 AM, Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi wrote:
> Yes I tried the NIO and NIO2 but not seen much difference. The TPS
> only increased 3K with NIO2.
What is you
Ravi,
On 4/20/16 6:55 AM, Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi wrote:
> Yes I tried the NIO and NIO2 but not seen much difference. The TPS
> only increased 3K with NIO2.
What is your test case?
-chris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsub
Yes I tried the NIO and NIO2 but not seen much difference. The TPS only
increased 3K with NIO2.
-Original Message-
From: Igor Cicimov [mailto:icici...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 4:21 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
On
e sometimes even less TPS.
> Regards,
> Ravi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 7:38 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
>
> -
...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 7:38 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ravi,
On 4/19/16 1:04 AM, Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi wrote:
> Hi, I am using tomcat 6 in my product. I am planning to upgrade
2016-04-19 1:04 GMT-04:00 Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi <
ravi.chandra.suryavan...@ericsson.com>:
> Hi,
> I am using tomcat 6 in my product. I am planning to upgrade to tomcat 8 as
> tomcat is going to EoS in Dec-2016.
> I have just taken the performance of Tomcat 8 and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ravi,
On 4/19/16 1:04 AM, Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi wrote:
> Hi, I am using tomcat 6 in my product. I am planning to upgrade to
> tomcat 8 as tomcat is going to EoS in Dec-2016. I have just taken
> the performance of Tomcat 8 and found the
Hi,
I am using tomcat 6 in my product. I am planning to upgrade to tomcat 8 as
tomcat is going to EoS in Dec-2016.
I have just taken the performance of Tomcat 8 and found the 70% less
performance compared to tomcat 6. See the below results Tomcat 6 is giving
167473.2/s whereas tomcat 8 is
r do you get some kind of exception in Tomcat's
catalina.out or other log?
Thanks,
- -chris
> -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas
> [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: 14 March 2016 20:14 To: Tomcat
> Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.x 32bit-- becomes non responsive
> state / crash
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: 14 March 2016 20:14
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.x 32bit-- becomes non responsive state / crash/hang
On 14/03/2016 14:41, Mahudeswaran A wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are facing unusual issue in Tomcat 6.x, wh
On 14/03/2016 14:41, Mahudeswaran A wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are facing unusual issue in Tomcat 6.x, where Tomcat 6.x becomes non
> responsive state after two week's time.
> This happens randomly;
> The jvisualvm screen shows CPU, memory, thread are normal and we don't see
Hi,
We are facing unusual issue in Tomcat 6.x, where Tomcat 6.x becomes non
responsive state after two week's time.
This happens randomly;
The jvisualvm screen shows CPU, memory, thread are normal and we don't see
memory leak, thread leak or CPU hike.
JVM running is 32 bit;
In our l
On 18/02/2016 22:57, Ty wrote:
> I've re-run my tests using 8.0.x trunk (8.0.33-dev) using the same
> procedure from the first message of this thread, and summarized the results
> below. Heap usage is vastly improved both with and without JAR scanning.
> Heap size and startup time are both reasona
I've re-run my tests using 8.0.x trunk (8.0.33-dev) using the same
procedure from the first message of this thread, and summarized the results
below. Heap usage is vastly improved both with and without JAR scanning.
Heap size and startup time are both reasonable and it's now feasible to
re-visit o
> Are you able to build Tomcat 8.0.x from source to test locally or would
> you like me to provide you with a test build?
Looks like building is pretty straightforward. I'll dive in and post back
with my testing results.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:11 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> Another update.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
On 2/18/16 10:11 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Another update.
>
> Before any fixes, my tests showed a heap of ~1GB with ~30% used by
> WebappClassLoader and 50% by JarResourceSet
>
> The WebappClassLoader issue was triggered by JAR scanning.
> Di
Another update.
Before any fixes, my tests showed a heap of ~1GB with ~30% used by
WebappClassLoader and 50% by JarResourceSet
The WebappClassLoader issue was triggered by JAR scanning. Disabling /
limiting JAR scanning will reduce the impact of this issue.
The issue has been fixed in 9.0.x and 8
On 18/02/2016 00:26, Ty wrote:
>>> For Ty's purposes, simply avoid JAR scanning entirely should eliminate
>>> the heap issues, right? Moving from Tomcat 6 means that JAR scanning
>>> is not required for correct operation of their application.
>
>>
>> For Ty's purposes, simply avoid JAR scanning entirely should eliminate
>> the heap issues, right? Moving from Tomcat 6 means that JAR scanning
>> is not required for correct operation of their application.
> Yes. http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/HowTo/FasterStartU
% of a 1GB heap.
>> There is also a WebappClassLoader issue that accounts for ~30% of
>> the same heap.
>
>> The WebappClassLoader issue is the easier to fix. I have fixed this
>> in trunk and am just waiting for the tests to confirm all is well.
>> I plan to ba
t;> and am happy to leapfrog over Tomcat 7. It's the memory
>>>> utilization in Tomcat 8 specifically, independent of JAR
>>>> scanning, that's the show-stopper for us. Let me know if I
>>>> can provide any other info, and thanks again.
>
>
lassLoader issue is the easier to fix. I have fixed this
> in trunk and am just waiting for the tests to confirm all is well.
> I plan to back-port this to 8.0.x for the next release.
>
> The JarResourceSet is going to be trickier. The code is the way it
> is partly for performance,
On 17/02/2016 11:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/02/2016 22:07, Ty wrote:
>>> Exactly which versions were you using when you ran your tests?
>>
>> According to my notes: 7.0.59, which should've been the most recent
>> version available at the time (about this time last year).
>>
>> To clarify: tha
On 16/02/2016 22:07, Ty wrote:
>> Exactly which versions were you using when you ran your tests?
>
> According to my notes: 7.0.59, which should've been the most recent
> version available at the time (about this time last year).
>
> To clarify: that was the version we did a heap dump analysis
> Exactly which versions were you using when you ran your tests?
According to my notes: 7.0.59, which should've been the most recent
version available at the time (about this time last year).
To clarify: that was the version we did a heap dump analysis of, and noted
the memory increase related
On 16/02/2016 20:14, Ty wrote:
>> JAR scanning should be transient. What was it that was causing the 10-20
>> fold increase?
>
> From memory (this was a while ago), it was related to
> java.util.jar.Manifest objects, or what they contained/referenced. I'd be
> glad to do another heap analysis and
, that's the show-stopper
> > for us. Let me know if I can provide any other info, and thanks
> > again.
>
> I'm not sure if others will agree, but if Tomcat had the option to
> ignore META-INF/resources in JAR files, you could probably save some
> memory. Since you
ther info, and thanks
> again.
I'm not sure if others will agree, but if Tomcat had the option to
ignore META-INF/resources in JAR files, you could probably save some
memory. Since you are currently using Tomcat 6, this setting wouldn't
affect you at all, since Tomcat 6 didn't
fically, independent
of JAR scanning, that's the show-stopper for us. Let me know if I can
provide any other info, and thanks again.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:58 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
On 16/02/2016 16:13, Ty wrote:
Summary:
Because of our use case (hundreds of webapps per instance), we
;
> > Because of our use case (hundreds of webapps per instance), we cannot
> > feasibly upgrade our Tomcat 6 containers to Tomcat 7 or Tomcat 8, due to
> > the massive increase in memory the upgrade causes.
> >
> > Background:
> >
> > We’ve been running Tomcat 6 fo
provide any other info, and thanks again.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:58 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 16/02/2016 16:13, Ty wrote:
>> > Summary:
>> >
>> > Because of our use case (hundreds of webapps per instance), we cannot
>> >
On 16/02/2016 16:13, Ty wrote:
> Summary:
>
> Because of our use case (hundreds of webapps per instance), we cannot
> feasibly upgrade our Tomcat 6 containers to Tomcat 7 or Tomcat 8, due to
> the massive increase in memory the upgrade causes.
>
> Background:
>
> We’v
JAR scanning
(tomcat.util.scan.DefaultJarScanner). When setting jarsToSkip=*, the
memory consumption was decreased to something somewhat more reasonable
(2-3x increase over Tomcat 6) and the startup time went back to what we
were used to with Tomcat 6. However at that time we opted to stay on
Tomcat
Summary:
Because of our use case (hundreds of webapps per instance), we cannot
feasibly upgrade our Tomcat 6 containers to Tomcat 7 or Tomcat 8, due to
the massive increase in memory the upgrade causes.
Background:
We’ve been running Tomcat 6 for several years, on perhaps an unusual scale
t; 2016 7:42 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 | Tomcat
> with APR causing Thread Blocking
>
> Ravi,
>
> On 2/9/16 7:10 AM, Ranjan, Ravi wrote:
>> HI Chris,
>
>> Sorry for a delayed response. Here is few information that you
>> asked for: 1.
I am able to crack this one.
Regards,
Ravi Ranjan
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 7:42 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 | Tomcat with APR causing Thread Blocking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ravi,
On 2/9/16 7:10 AM, Ranjan, Ravi wrote:
> HI Chris,
>
> Sorry for a delayed response. Here is few information that you
> asked for: 1. Tomcat Native Library version is 1.1.30 and APR
> version is 1.4.8 2. I am running my tomcat 6.0.41 on Windo
nks,
Ravi Ranjan
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 4:18 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 | Tomcat with APR causing Thread Blocking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ravi,
On 2/4/16
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ravi,
On 2/4/16 2:15 AM, Ranjan, Ravi wrote:
> I am new to this user list and this is the first email I am
> sending out to you. Hope you will let me know if more
> information/logs/dump/test case/clarity is required.
Welcome.
> So I am working wit
Hi Guys,
I am new to this user list and this is the first email I am sending out to you.
Hope you will let me know if more information/logs/dump/test case/clarity is
required.
So I am working with Tomcat 6.0.41 (both 64bit and 32 bit). In my Tomcat
environment I am using APR (Apache Portable
;
> Thanks,
> Abir
>
> From: Datta, Abir - Ealing
> Sent: 05 November 2015 17:17
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Classloading performance problems, Tomcat 8 upgrade from tomcat 6
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for the response. The setti
upgrade from tomcat 6
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the response. The setting is already enabled. We have upgraded to
tomcat version 8.0.26
Thanks,
Abir
From: Mark Thomas
Sent: 05 November 2015 17:07
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Classloading performance
upgrade from tomcat 6
On 05/11/2015 16:58, Datta, Abir - Ealing wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Background
>
> Application server has been upgraded from tomcat 6 to tomcat 8. We are
> experiencingperformance issues in transactions which involve XML processing
> using DOM4J and xerces a
On 05/11/2015 16:58, Datta, Abir - Ealing wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Background
>
> Application server has been upgraded from tomcat 6 to tomcat 8. We are
> experiencingperformance issues in transactions which involve XML processing
> using DOM4J and xerces api. The applicat
Hi,
Background
Application server has been upgraded from tomcat 6 to tomcat 8. We are
experiencingperformance issues in transactions which involve XML processing
using DOM4J and xerces api. The application uses dom4j-1.6.1.jar and
xercesImpl-2.10.0.jar. There has been no change in the
1 - 100 of 3289 matches
Mail list logo
