On 16/02/2016 20:14, Ty wrote: >> JAR scanning should be transient. What was it that was causing the 10-20 >> fold increase? > > From memory (this was a while ago), it was related to > java.util.jar.Manifest objects, or what they contained/referenced. I'd be > glad to do another heap analysis and summarize it if it would help, but > even more glad to just skip Tomcat 7 altogether.
There was an issue related to caching of Manifest instances but that should have been fixed. Exactly which versions were you using when you ran your tests? Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
