RE: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-27 Thread Nelson, Tracy
| From: Nikola Milutinovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk | | What's the story on Solaris? You need to buy C Compiler? I think they have | some Developer's Studio, but I haven't checked licensing. Solaris 10 comes with gcc and frie

Re: OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread Rainer Jung
wrote: >> Date sent: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:26:34 -0800 (PST) >> From: Nikola Milutinovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject:OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk >> To: Tomcat Users List >> Send re

Re: OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread William Bonnet
Hi What's the story on Solaris? You need to buy C Compiler? I think they have some Developer's Studio, but I haven't checked licensing. gnu gcc works great on solaris And Sun Studio 11 can be freely downloaded fron Sun's website Regards William -- William http://ww

Re: OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread ben short
TED]> Subject: OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk To: Tomcat Users List Send reply to: Tomcat Users List > > Installing from source is super simple. It's a pretty basic "untar, > > configure, make, install" kinda pa

Re: OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread Steve Ochani
Date sent: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:26:34 -0800 (PST) From: Nikola Milutinovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk To: Tomcat Users List Send reply to: Tomcat Users List > > Ins

OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
> Installing from source is super simple. It's a pretty basic "untar, > configure, make, install" kinda package, and always results in the > binary that is appropriate for your setup. You just need to make sure > that you have a C compiler handy (which, as I recall, Solaris does not > always have).

Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread ben short
Chris, Are these not binary releases then? http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/ On 11/24/06, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben, ben short wrote: > Chris, > > Um, a good question.

Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben, ben short wrote: > Chris, > > Um, a good question. I thought that mod_jk was only available as > source and pkg_get -i ap2_mod_jk seemed like an easier option. Altough > it turned out to be a headache. > > If i get time I might try out the bina

Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread ben short
Chris, Um, a good question. I thought that mod_jk was only available as source and pkg_get -i ap2_mod_jk seemed like an easier option. Altough it turned out to be a headache. If i get time I might try out the binary from apache. Ben On 11/24/06, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben, ben short wrote: > Rainer, > After looking at the package on the blastwave site i noticed it has > Apache 2.2 prefork MPM as a dependancy. Why are you using a 3rd-party distribution of mod_jk instead of the official one? I didn't even though 3r

Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-22 Thread ben short
Rainer, I did a find for apachectl and it finds it in three locations /usr/apache/bin/apachectl /usr/apache2/bin/apachectl /opt/csw/apache2/sbin/apachectl The first is an apache 1.3 install, the second an apache 2.0.52 install the the third is an apache 2.2.3 install. After looking at the pack

Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-22 Thread Rainer Jung
ben short schrieb: > Rainer, > > Running the svcadm enable apache2 command without the LoadModule > starts apache correctly. > > Someone else pointed out that using svcs -xv will show me the logfile > I need to look at, and I see the following error.. > > [ Nov 22 19:35:06 Method "start" exited

Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-22 Thread ben short
Rainer, Running the svcadm enable apache2 command without the LoadModule starts apache correctly. Someone else pointed out that using svcs -xv will show me the logfile I need to look at, and I see the following error.. [ Nov 22 19:35:06 Method "start" exited with status 1 ] [ Nov 22 19:35:06 Ex

Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-22 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Ben, before you integrate your apache into Solaris SMF (service management facility) you should first check, if apache does really work. So begin by using the usual apachectl script and once you debugged your configuration and the functionality looks good, you can use SMF to reliably star

Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-22 Thread ben short
Hi, Sorry if that this is a bit off topic but i figured someone might have some experience. I'm trying to get Apache 2 to use mod_jk in a Solaris 10 Zone. I have installed the ap2_mod_jk package from blastwave with no errors. I added the following line to the correct httpd.conf LoadModule jk_mo