Re: mod_jk errors

2016-07-18 Thread Wayne Li
Thank you for both! On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 12.07.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Wayne Li: > >> Hi, >> >> I have a servlet/jsp application running on tomcat 7.0.47. There are no >> static html files. >> Now I am try to use apache 2.4.7 (Ubuntu) >> as the front and forward

Re: mod_jk errors

2016-07-15 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 12.07.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Wayne Li: Hi, I have a servlet/jsp application running on tomcat 7.0.47. There are no static html files. Now I am try to use apache 2.4.7 (Ubuntu) as the front and forward eveything to tomcat. I installed mod_jk using Ubuntu's software center.. Things are working.

Re: mod_jk errors

2016-07-13 Thread tomcat
On 12.07.2016 19:44, Wayne Li wrote: Hi, I have a servlet/jsp application running on tomcat 7.0.47. There are no static html files. Now I am try to use apache 2.4.7 (Ubuntu) as the front and forward eveything to tomcat. I installed mod_jk using Ubuntu's software center.. Things are working. But

Re: mod_jk errors errno=110 and errno=115

2013-04-21 Thread Philippe Bossu
Thank you Rainer, it was very helpful. Sorry for late answer. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 14.02.2013 14:17, Philippe Bossu wrote: > > We have a mod_jk in version 1.2.28 with Apache 2.16 fronting a Tomcat > > server in version 6 on JDK6. > > > > We are facing long re

Re: mod_jk errors errno=110 and errno=115

2013-02-17 Thread Rainer Jung
On 14.02.2013 14:17, Philippe Bossu wrote: > We have a mod_jk in version 1.2.28 with Apache 2.16 fronting a Tomcat > server in version 6 on JDK6. > > We are facing long response times and timeouts from time to time. > Mod_jk log files show the following errors: > > [][X] [error]

Re: mod_jk errors errno=110 and errno=115

2013-02-14 Thread Philippe Bossu
Thank you, we'll double check On Friday, February 15, 2013, Martin Gainty wrote: > Phillipe > > ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1630): > (nodeYY) connecting to backend failed. Tomcat is probably not started or is > listening on the wrong port (errno=115) > > indicate that you might have a misc

RE: mod_jk errors errno=110 and errno=115

2013-02-14 Thread Martin Gainty
Phillipe ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1630): (nodeYY) connecting to backend failed. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port (errno=115) indicate that you might have a misconfig on jk.properties ...check out host and port attributes here http://tomcat.apache.org/con

Re: mod_jk errors with tomcat 6.0.20 and Apache 2.0.52

2010-01-25 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt, On 1/22/2010 5:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > In between times I tried the ProxyPass which seems to work fine, but I'd much > rather use plain AJP so I'll try that next. AJP is the protocol used by both mod_jk and mod_proxy_ajp (which is what you

RE: mod_jk errors with tomcat 6.0.20 and Apache 2.0.52

2010-01-22 Thread Matt Turner
010 14:53:21 -0500 > From: ch...@christopherschultz.net > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: mod_jk errors with tomcat 6.0.20 and Apache 2.0.52 > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Matt, > > On 1/22/2010 9:25 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > >

Re: mod_jk errors with tomcat 6.0.20 and Apache 2.0.52

2010-01-22 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt, On 1/22/2010 9:25 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > In my case sometimes I do need to pass through the SSL to Tomcat, as > I'm running CAS which requires geniune SSL requests. mod_jk ought to be able to forward all SSL information to Tomcat. Specificall

Re: mod_jk errors with tomcat 6.0.20 and Apache 2.0.52

2010-01-22 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter, On 1/22/2010 7:49 AM, Peter Crowther wrote: > - You're telling AJP to use a secure connection between httpd and Tomcat; AJP doesn't recognize any "secure" connection capability for its own communication. As you've said, AJP /does/ forward SSL

Re: mod_jk errors with tomcat 6.0.20 and Apache 2.0.52

2010-01-22 Thread Tobias Crefeld
Am Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:25:11 + schrieb Matt Turner : > The SSL pass-through requirement explains why I was attempting to > pass through to :8443 directly - but it sounds like that's the wrong > approach. If it isn't possible to move the SSL-certificate and -keys to the Apache2 (and change the

RE: mod_jk errors with tomcat 6.0.20 and Apache 2.0.52

2010-01-22 Thread Matt Turner
ataneo.eu > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: mod_jk errors with tomcat 6.0.20 and Apache 2.0.52 > > I guess that you should exchange the "JkMount /* tomcatssl" by > "JkMount /* tomcat1" provided you use a "standard" Tomcat-setup. > > For a parallel

Re: mod_jk errors with tomcat 6.0.20 and Apache 2.0.52

2010-01-22 Thread Tobias Crefeld
I guess that you should exchange the "JkMount /* tomcatssl" by "JkMount /* tomcat1" provided you use a "standard" Tomcat-setup. For a parallel SSL- + Non-SSL-Setup using Apache2 you basically need 2 virtual-hosts in Apache2. One for Port 443 with the standard-SSL-parameters Apache2 expects to inte

RE: mod_jk errors with tomcat 6.0.20 and Apache 2.0.52

2010-01-22 Thread Matt Turner
OK - sounds likely, many thanks. I'll give that a whirl. > Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:49:49 + > Subject: Re: mod_jk errors with tomcat 6.0.20 and Apache 2.0.52 > From: peter.crowt...@melandra.com > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > > I'm not an AJP expert, but I su

Re: mod_jk errors with tomcat 6.0.20 and Apache 2.0.52

2010-01-22 Thread Peter Crowther
I'm not an AJP expert, but I suspect: - You're telling AJP to use a secure connection between httpd and Tomcat; - The Tomcat connector on port 8443 is a SSL connector, not an AJP connector; - AJP is getting confused. I believe you should only need to configure one worker (the one on 8009); AJP is

Re: mod_jk errors and http status code 503 under load

2007-09-10 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Damien, Damien Corbishley wrote: Good morning Rainer, bash-3.00# /usr/local/apache2/bin/httpd -V Server version: Apache/2.0.55 Server built: Mar 5 2007 11:10:17 Server's Module Magic Number: 20020903:11 Architecture: 32-bit Server compiled with -D APACHE_MPM_DIR="server/mpm/worker"

RE: mod_jk errors and http status code 503 under load

2007-09-10 Thread Damien Corbishley
urrently using jmeter to try and re-produce the problem in our lab before I update anything - just so I can be sure if I have solved the issue. May I get back to you later if I am still having issues? Damien -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

Re: mod_jk errors and http status code 503 under load

2007-09-06 Thread Rainer Jung
starting point (and maybe it will be gone). Damien -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 3:42 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk errors and http status code 503 under load Damien Corbishley wrote: Hi, I'm gettin

RE: mod_jk errors and http status code 503 under load

2007-09-06 Thread Damien Corbishley
o: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk errors and http status code 503 under load Damien Corbishley wrote: > Hi, > > I'm getting stuck with an error we are seeing on our production > server under load. > > We upgraded our combination of Apache,Tomcat,Java all running on > S

Re: mod_jk errors and http status code 503 under load

2007-09-06 Thread Rainer Jung
Damien Corbishley wrote: Hi, I'm getting stuck with an error we are seeing on our production server under load. We upgraded our combination of Apache,Tomcat,Java all running on Solaris 10 to Apache 2_2.0.55.build2 This doesn't sound like a real Apache httpd version. You can check the real v

Re: mod_jk errors - are these normal?

2006-03-06 Thread Justin Greene
> -Original Message- > From: michael thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 4:42 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: TomcatUsers: Re: mod_jk errors - are these normal? > > --- Sven K�hler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > &

Re: mod_jk errors - are these normal?

2006-03-06 Thread michael thomas
--- Sven K�hler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [Wed Mar 01 20:00:42 2006] [error] > > ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c > (961): > > Can't receive the response message from tomcat, > > network problems or tomcat is down > (10.0.0.9:8009), > > err=-113 > > [Wed Mar 01 20:00:42 20

Re: mod_jk errors - are these normal?

2006-03-02 Thread michael thomas
--- Sven K�hler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [Wed Mar 01 20:00:42 2006] [error] > > ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c > (961): > > Can't receive the response message from tomcat, > > network problems or tomcat is down > (10.0.0.9:8009), > > err=-113 > > [Wed Mar 01 20:00:42 2006]

Re: mod_jk errors - are these normal?

2006-03-02 Thread Sven Köhler
> The system seems to work fine from a user's > perspective, but we still occasionally get these: > > [Wed Mar 01 20:00:42 2006] [error] > ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (961): > Can't receive the response message from tomcat, > network problems or tomcat is down (10.0.0.9:8009),