OK - sounds likely, many thanks.
I'll give that a whirl.

> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:49:49 +0000
> Subject: Re: mod_jk errors with tomcat 6.0.20 and Apache 2.0.52
> From: peter.crowt...@melandra.com
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> 
> I'm not an AJP expert, but I suspect:
> 
> - You're telling AJP to use a secure connection between httpd and Tomcat;
> - The Tomcat connector on port 8443 is a SSL connector, not an AJP connector;
> - AJP is getting confused.
> 
> I believe you should only need to configure one worker (the one on
> 8009); AJP is capable of passing through the information as to whether
> or not the data arrived securely or not at httpd.
> 
> I suspect you'll get a better answer once the States wakes up, but
> that's my guess.
> 
> - Peter
> 
> 2010/1/22 Matt Turner <m4tt_tur...@hotmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> >
> > I have an existing Apache 2.0.52 installation, and a new tomcat 6.0.20 
> > installation.
> >
> > They are both sitting on the same Linux box - uname -a returns the 
> > following:
> >
> > Linux [machine name] 2.6.9-55.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 16:36:54 EDT 2007 
> > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >
> >
> >
> > I'd like if possible to add mod_jk to enable the two to talk to each other, 
> > without fiddling with the existing tomcat / apache versions.
> >
> >
> >
> > So far I've build mod_jk 1.2.28 from source on the destination machine, and 
> > set up the following workers:
> >
> >
> >
> > (in apache conf)
> >
> > <IfModule mod_jk.c>
> >  JkWorkersFile /etc/httpd/conf/workers.properties
> >
> >  JkLogFile /etc/httpd/logs/mod_jk.log
> >
> >  JkLogLevel debug
> >
> >  JkLogStampFormat "[%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] "
> >
> >  JkWorkersFile /etc/httpd/conf/workers.properties
> >
> >  JkLogFile /etc/httpd/logs/mod_jk.log
> >
> >  JkLogLevel debug
> >
> >  JkLogStampFormat "[%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] "
> >
> >  JkRequestLogFormat "%w %V %T"
> >
> >  JkOptions +ForwardURICompatUnparsed
> >
> >  JkExtractSSL On
> >  JkHTTPSIndicator HTTPS
> >  JkSESSIONIndicator SSL_SESSION_ID
> >  JkCIPHERIndicator SSL_CIPHER
> >  JkCERTSIndicator SSL_CLIENT_CERT
> > </IfModule>
> >
> >
> >
> > (in apache conf, inside a virtual host)
> >
> > SSLEngine on
> > SSLCertificateFile /etc/httpd/conf/<filename>
> >
> > SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/httpd/conf/<filename>
> >
> > SSLCACertificateFile /etc/httpd/conf/<filename>
> >
> > JkMount /* tomcatssl
> >
> >
> >
> > (in workers.properties)
> >
> > # ------------------------
> > # First tomcat server
> > # ------------------------
> > worker.tomcat1.port=8009
> > worker.tomcat1.host=10.13.0.218
> > worker.tomcat1.type=ajp13
> > worker.tomcat1.lbfactor=50
> >
> > #---------------------
> > # SSL tomcat server
> > #---------------------
> > worker.tomcatssl.port=8443
> > worker.tomcatssl.host=10.13.0.218
> > worker.tomcatssl.type=ajp13
> > worker.tomcatssl.lbfactor=50
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > However when I kick things off and visit a URL matching the above virtual 
> > host, I get the following error message in mod_jk.log:
> >
> >
> >
> > [Thu Jan 21 18:51:07 2010] [303:2537062720] [info] init_jk::mod_jk.c 
> > (3183): mod_jk/1.2.28 initialized
> > [Thu Jan 21 18:51:30 2010] [30428:2537062720] [error] 
> > ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (1172): wrong message 
> > format 0x1503 from 10.13.0.218:8443
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Looking at jk_ajp_common.c I can see the following @ line 1172:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > if (ae->proto == AJP13_PROTO) {
> >    if (header != AJP13_SW_HEADER) {
> >
> >        if (header == AJP14_SW_HEADER) {
> >            jk_log(l, JK_LOG_ERROR,
> >                   "received AJP14 reply on an AJP13 connection from %s",
> >                   jk_dump_hinfo(&ae->worker->worker_inet_addr, buf));
> >        }
> >        else {
> >            jk_log(l, JK_LOG_ERROR,
> >                   "wrong message format 0x%04x from %s",
> >                   header, jk_dump_hinfo(&ae->worker->worker_inet_addr,
> >                                         buf));
> >        }
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > So it seems the error has something do with AJP13 headers not being as 
> > expected.
> >
> >
> >
> > Could anyone confirm that the 3 version numbers (2.0.52, 1.2.28, 6.0.20) 
> > are compatible together ?
> >
> >
> >
> > If so - any ideas what might be going on here ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > matt.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Tell us your greatest, weirdest and funniest Hotmail stories
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> 
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Send us your Hotmail stories and be featured in our newsletter
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/

Reply via email to