-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin,
On 4/22/2010 5:53 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/4/23 Christopher Schultz :
>> I'd love to see the code that enforces this.
>
> Search for "applicationDispatcher.specViolation.request" and
> "applicationDispatcher.specViolation.resp
2010/4/23 Christopher Schultz :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Konstantin,
>
> On 4/22/2010 4:53 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2010/4/23 Kris Schneider :
>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
>>> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 4/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin,
On 4/22/2010 4:53 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/4/23 Kris Schneider :
>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
>> wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
If [th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kris,
On 4/22/2010 4:48 PM, Kris Schneider wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
>> The following filter works as expected on Tomcat 6.0.26 (some changes
>> were required to make it actually work... my off-the-cuff
2010/4/23 Kris Schneider :
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
>>> If [the request/filter] does a forward or include done the line, this
>>> won't work with any remotely recent version of
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bill,
>
> On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
>> If [the request/filter] does a forward or include done the line, this
>> won't work with any remotely recent version of Tomcat. T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
> If [the request/filter] does a forward or include done the line, this
> won't work with any remotely recent version of Tomcat. These
> versions enforce the spec requirement that the Request has to be a
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bill,
>
> On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
>>> It's pretty inaccessible for novice Java programmers, but you could use
>>> the "proxy" API which is [just] about the coolest thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
>> It's pretty inaccessible for novice Java programmers, but you could use
>> the "proxy" API which is [just] about the coolest thing available in
>> Java IMO.
>
> If it does a forward or include done the
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
>
>
> "Christopher Schultz" wrote in message
> news:4bcf5f41.6060...@christopherschultz.net...
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> André,
>>
>> On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
>>>
>>> Mark Thomas wrote:
>
On 21/04/2010 19:52, André Warnier wrote:
> Hi.
> A while ago, I wrote a servlet filter which has served me well since, to
> wrap a servlet for which I do not have nor can obtain the source code,
> and of which I only generally know what it does.
> Now it seems that with a new version of this servl
"Christopher Schultz" wrote in message
news:4bcf5f41.6060...@christopherschultz.net...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD an
Mark, Chris and Kris, thanks.
You have all impressed the hell out of me.
You have also lost me.. at a guess about 50 lines ago.
But I get the idea, and it is nice to learn that such things exist.
I also believe this may be helpful to someone else some day looking for
a solution to a case much mor
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> André,
>
> On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
>> Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
> I'd just use JAD a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
>>> Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
>>> Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxio
On 21/04/2010 20:46, André Warnier wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
>>> Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
>>> Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
>>> anything of the kind, I would not
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under suspicion of
reverse-engineering. So is ther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:24 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
> ...
>
>>
>> I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
>>
> Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
> anything of the kind, I would not want to even come u
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
> ...
>
>>
>> I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
>>
> Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
> anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under suspicion of
> reverse-engineering. So is there so
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under suspicion of
reverse-engineering. So is there something that just lists the standard
calls/methods used
On 21/04/2010 19:52, André Warnier wrote:
> Hi.
> A while ago, I wrote a servlet filter which has served me well since, to
> wrap a servlet for which I do not have nor can obtain the source code,
> and of which I only generally know what it does.
> Now it seems that with a new version of this servl
21 matches
Mail list logo
