2014-02-03 Daniel Mikusa :
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 9:00 AM, Maor Yosef wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>
> Also, please realize that a JSP page, even one that simply prints out "OK"
> will create a session. This is by design and if you don't want it to create
> a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Konstantin,
On 2/3/14, 7:40 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2014-02-03 Maor Yosef :
>> Hi.
>>
>
> Please read the rules and do not top-post, as it is hard to
> follow. http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html#tomcat-users
>
>> 4. Can you point me to a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Daniel,
On 2/3/14, 7:10 AM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Maor Yosef
> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> 1. We are aware that 6.0.26 is old, but since there is a large
>> operational impact, we wont upgrade the tomcat until we will know
On Feb 3, 2014, at 9:00 AM, Maor Yosef wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>
>> On Feb 3, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Maor Yosef wrote:
>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> 1. We are aware that 6.0.26 is old, but since there is a large
>> operational
>>> impact, we wont upgrade the tomcat unti
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Maor Yosef wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > 1. We are aware that 6.0.26 is old, but since there is a large
> operational
> > impact, we wont upgrade the tomcat until we will know its definetly an
> > issue in this specifi
2014-02-03 Maor Yosef :
> Hi.
>
Please read the rules and do not top-post, as it is hard to follow.
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html#tomcat-users
> 4. Can you point me to an article on how to configure different background
> thread for each container? is it configured in tomcat or should be
>
On Feb 3, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Maor Yosef wrote:
> Hi.
>
> 1. We are aware that 6.0.26 is old, but since there is a large operational
> impact, we wont upgrade the tomcat until we will know its definetly an
> issue in this specific version
While I understand what you’re saying, I disagree. If you
using 64 bit
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Johan Compagner wrote:
> On 3 February 2014 09:30, Maor Yosef wrote:
>
> > 2. You are right, it was my mistake, it causes OOM and not stack
> overflow,
> > when we see high sessions count we get exceptions saying "unable to
> create
> > new native t
On 3 February 2014 09:30, Maor Yosef wrote:
> 2. You are right, it was my mistake, it causes OOM and not stack overflow,
> when we see high sessions count we get exceptions saying "unable to create
> new native thread"
>
do you use a 32 bit vm?
Because most of the time when i see this i ask the
Hi.
1. We are aware that 6.0.26 is old, but since there is a large operational
impact, we wont upgrade the tomcat until we will know its definetly an
issue in this specific version
2. You are right, it was my mistake, it causes OOM and not stack overflow,
when we see high sessions count we get exc
2014-02-02 Maor Yosef :
> Hi,
1. 6.0.26 is old.
> We are facing issues where the sessions are not being expired
> and eventually causing a stack overflow.
2. Non-expiring sessions may cause OOM, but they cannot cause a stack overflow.
What are your evidences?
> We see that at some point the se
Alright, thanks, Konstantin.
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 3:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26 stopped logging
2012/2/14 Propes, Barry L :
> Well this was odd. To me.
>
> I'
2012/2/14 Propes, Barry L :
> Well this was odd. To me.
>
> I'm sure some of you will tell me about logging with Log4j or some other
> logger, or even the use of the Tomcat app manager.
>
> My web.xml file got deleted. I thought, (probably wrongly) that Tomcat's web
> manager console would alert
tz.net]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 3:28 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26 stopped logging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry,
On 2/13/12 1:16 PM, Propes, Barry L wrote:
> I am using Tomcat 6.0.26 on a few machines - Win XP Pro on two of
> them, and
Please do not top-post. Answer below.
2012/2/14 Propes, Barry L :
> Application log, yes...error log.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 2:37 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26 stopped
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry,
On 2/13/12 1:16 PM, Propes, Barry L wrote:
> I am using Tomcat 6.0.26 on a few machines - Win XP Pro on two of
> them, and Windows Server 2003 on the production machine. Also
> using jdk1.6.0_18 and was on Ora10g, now 111g.
That's quite an up
Application log, yes...error log.
-Original Message-
From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 2:37 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26 stopped logging
On 13/02/2012 18:16, Propes, Barry L wrote:
> Hello Tomcat users and developers.
>
On 13/02/2012 18:16, Propes, Barry L wrote:
> Hello Tomcat users and developers.
>
> I am using Tomcat 6.0.26 on a few machines - Win XP Pro on two of them, and
> Windows Server 2003 on the production machine.
> Also using jdk1.6.0_18 and was on Ora10g, now 111g.
>
> Today, Tomcat stopped loggin
This seems a reasonable solution to my problem.
I'll try this!
Thanks a lot,
Ana
> Here are two solutions based on installing the "real Tomcat" from
> tomcat.apache.org.
>
> 1. Keep your current installation
>
> a. Keep your current NetBeans installation
> b. Download Tomcat 6.0.33 from tomcat.a
- Original Message -
> From: André Warnier
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 1:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26 bundled with Netbeans 6.9.1
>
> Ana Maria Teodorescu wrote:
>> Dear Tomcat users and experts,
>>
On 24/08/2011 09:44, André Warnier wrote:
> Ana Maria Teodorescu wrote:
>>Dear Tomcat users and experts,
>>
>> I downloaded Netbeans 6.9.1 including Apache Tomcat on my Mac snow
>> leopard.
>> When I go to the page http://localhost:8080/ the message that I've setup
>> correctly Tomcat appears.
Ana Maria Teodorescu wrote:
Dear Tomcat users and experts,
I downloaded Netbeans 6.9.1 including Apache Tomcat on my Mac snow leopard.
When I go to the page http://localhost:8080/ the message that I've setup
correctly Tomcat appears. But, if I click on the following links:
1)Tomcat documentat
2011/1/17 Jany Jose :
> Hi,
>
> When i see the thread dump i could see a thread dead lock with other thread.
> Please find below the thread dump message and kindly advice how to avoid it.
>
You would better try with 6.0.30. There were a lot of fixes since 6.0.26.
>From the stack trace
> at jav
Jany Jose schrieb am 17.01.2011 um 13:46 (+0530):
>
> When i see the thread dump i could see a thread dead lock with other thread.
> Please find below the thread dump message and kindly advice how to avoid it.
>
> *Found one Java-level deadlock:
> =
> "RMI TCP Connecti
Hi,
When i see the thread dump i could see a thread dead lock with other thread.
Please find below the thread dump message and kindly advice how to avoid it.
*Found one Java-level deadlock:
=
"RMI TCP Connection(3)-10.128.32.128":
waiting to lock monitor 0x0f
> From: Jany Jose [mailto:jany.j...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Tomcat 6.0.26 startup issue
> In our application we are starting tomcat as a thread by calling the
> bootstrap class.
> Please find the code used: *String[] mArgs = {"start"};
> Bootstrap.main(mArgs);
And a thread dump shows what?
- Chu
On 22/09/2010 17:16, Eero Nevalainen wrote:
> I've got an exploded web app running on a Tomcat 6.0.26 server on
> Debian Lenny, and I've run into a really strange problem with trying
> to up the session timeout into something like 120 minutes from the
> default 30... regardless of what it says in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 9/14/2010 4:21 PM, Pid wrote:
> On 14/09/2010 20:42, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>> From: Vincent DELHOMMOIS [mailto:vinc...@free.fr]
>>> Subject: Tomcat 6.0.26 64 bits = CPU 100%
>>
>>> On these days, the CPU are stuck at 100% and doesn't
On 14/09/2010 20:42, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Vincent DELHOMMOIS [mailto:vinc...@free.fr]
>> Subject: Tomcat 6.0.26 64 bits = CPU 100%
>
>> On these days, the CPU are stuck at 100% and doesn't
>> decrease. Do you have any idea ?
>
> I'm tempted to just answer "yes", and let it go at
> From: Vincent DELHOMMOIS [mailto:vinc...@free.fr]
> Subject: Tomcat 6.0.26 64 bits = CPU 100%
> Hi everybody,
You don't get extra credit for posting the exact same message twice...
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is thus for us
> From: Vincent DELHOMMOIS [mailto:vinc...@free.fr]
> Subject: Tomcat 6.0.26 64 bits = CPU 100%
> On these days, the CPU are stuck at 100% and doesn't
> decrease. Do you have any idea ?
I'm tempted to just answer "yes", and let it go at that.
However, let's try a bit more detail:
1) What do r
: "URLGenerator" and gets the PORT from System.properties
file! And this is where the port was specified as 8080. I changed that to the
one in Server.xml and VOILA!!
--- On Mon, 7/5/10, André Warnier wrote:
> From: André Warnier
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26 with Java 6 update 20 on Sun S
rahul wrote:
Hello Friends
A very strange findings for today! Found it only because I skipped the first "Launch" page that used to launch a new window through Java Script. Now, the finding is -
1. After the Launch, this would open a Home Page with the request URL -
http://:5080/
2. Clicking o
P requests on 5080 port.
I tested this in Windows with 5080 listener port and it failed there too.
Any hints?
- Regards
Rahul
--- On Mon, 7/5/10, Pid wrote:
> From: Pid
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26 with Java 6 update 20 on Sun Solaris 5.8 Sparc -
> Web application unable to ex
%>
> and
> <%@ page errorPage="ErrorPage.jsp" extends="com.salmonllc.jsp.JspServlet"%>
>
> ErrorPage.jsp is perfectly correct case-wise.
There is an ErrorPage.jsp in each directory?
p
>
>
> --- On Fri, 7/2/10, Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
>
="com.salmonllc.jsp.JspServlet"%>
ErrorPage.jsp is perfectly correct case-wise.
--- On Fri, 7/2/10, Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
> From: Mikolaj Rydzewski
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26 with Java 6 update 20 on Sun Solaris 5.8 Sparc -
> Web application unable to execute properly
&g
On 07/02/2010 01:23 AM, rahul wrote:
1. I tried building the war in Windows and worked fine. I transferred
the war to UNIX, it mis-behaves as described earlier.
2. I tried building the war in UNIX, it mis-behaves as described earlier. I
transferred the war to Windows and it worked fine.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John,
I think we might want to start again and work from the ground up. If
you've been working in the dark-ages with the invoker servlet and
non-packaged servlets, these things can pile up on you.
First of all, make it a point to put all your servlet
In support of my email below, I am attaching the logs. As they are not in zip
format, I hop they will not be removed. Else, I need to copy and paste each one
of them :)
--- On Fri, 7/2/10, rahul wrote:
> From: rahul
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26 with Java 6 update 20 on Sun Solaris 5.8
This email contained a .zip file attachment. Raytheon does not allow email
attachments that are considered likely to contain malicious code. For your
protection this attachment has been removed.
If this email is from an unknown source, please simply delete this email.
If this email was expected
On 01/07/2010 18:55, John Byrne wrote:
> On 1 July 2010 16:25, Pid wrote:
>> On 01/07/2010 15:52, John Byrne wrote:
>
> Hi Chuck
>
> Please find details of setup copied below
>
>
> onsubmit = "return formCheck()">
This "formCheck" javascript function doesn't mangle the URL does it?
> The a
> From: John Byrne [mailto:jbmulti...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26
>
> HTTP 404 STATUS
> description The requested resource (/ukjava1900) is not available.
So how is the webapp deployed? Location? Contents of its element
(and its location)?
- Chuck
THIS CO
On 1 July 2010 19:00, Caldarale, Charles R
Dear Chuck
Sincere apologies
HTTP 404 STATUS
description The requested resource (/ukjava1900) is not available.
jOHN
--
Mult-i-tel better by design.
http://www.multitel.co.uk
tel: 44(0)151 548 8122
fax: 44(0)709 210 1464
skype jcbyrne
---
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: John Byrne [mailto:jbmulti...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26
description The requested resource (/UkJava1900d=%22post%22)
is not available.
Which it certainly isn't - your URL is invalid. Perhaps you meant to try:
/UkJava1900?=%22post%22
To m
> From: John Byrne [mailto:jbmulti...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26
>
> description The requested resource (/UkJava1900d=%22post%22)
> is not available.
Which it certainly isn't - your URL is invalid. Perhaps you meant to try:
/UkJava1900?=%22post%22
- Chuck
On 1 July 2010 16:25, Pid wrote:
> On 01/07/2010 15:52, John Byrne wrote:
Hi Chuck
Please find details of setup copied below
The and tags both copied from
webapps/myapp/WEB-INF/web.xml
UkJava1900
formprocessors.UkJava1900
UkJava1900
/UkJava1900
http statu
On 01/07/2010 15:52, John Byrne wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is the first line in my java servlet ukjava1900 it compiles OK
>
> package formprocessors;
>
> is it complete?
Yes. It wouldn't compile otherwise.
'UkJava1900' would be better than 'ukjava1900'
> I attach copy of my web.xml which i think
> From: John Byrne [mailto:jbmulti...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26
>
> is it complete?
Not sure what you're asking.
> I attach copy of my web.xml which i think is OK?
No, your value is very, very wrong. It should be:
formprocessors.ukjava1900
- Chuck
TH
Hi
This is the first line in my java servlet ukjava1900 it compiles OK
package formprocessors;
is it complete?
I attach copy of my web.xml which i think is OK?
Kind regards
John
On 1 July 2010 14:08, Pid wrote:
> On 01/07/2010 13:26, Shay Rojansky wrote:
>> /servlet/com/multitel/ukjava1900
server.xml, in the two different Tomcat
installations?
What do the logs says during startup in each Tomcat? (You might clear
the logs and start a fresh one for each server)
p
> Thanks and Regards,
> Rahul
>
> --- On Thu, 7/1/10, Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
>
>> From:
On 01/07/2010 13:26, Shay Rojansky wrote:
> /servlet/com/multitel/ukjava1900). Change this to
"/servlet/ukjava1900"
according to the HTML form 'action' attribute.
Also, a minor pedantic note: conventionally, classes are defined with
capitalised names. So one would expect to see it called
"com.
Thu, 7/1/10, Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
> From: Mikolaj Rydzewski
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26 with Java 6 update 20 on Sun Solaris 5.8 Sparc -
> Web application unable to execute properly
> To: "Tomcat Users List"
> Date: Thursday, July 1, 2010, 4:05 PM
> rahul wrote:
Hi.
pid's right - you should really put your classes in packages (although I'm
pretty sure it's not technically mandatory). But looking at your attached
files, I think I see another problem - confusion between the Java class
package and the servlet mapping.
In the web.xml element, you reference
rahul wrote:
1. Replacing the Windows war file with the one in UNIX, works fine.
2. Replacing the UNIX war file with that in Windows mis-behaves.
Please clarify what windows-war and unix-war mean.
So, in other words does it mean:
If you take old war file, that runs on Tomcat 4.x, from Solar
On 01/07/2010 10:48, John Byrne wrote:
> Hi Shay
>
> Still having problems with reading html form with servlet.
>
> We only have a small number of servlets and would choose not to place
> them in a package at this point in time.
>
> I understand your naming of package com.company.project, can yo
Hi Shay
Still having problems with reading html form with servlet.
We only have a small number of servlets and would choose not to place
them in a package at this point in time.
I understand your naming of package com.company.project, can you
replace com\mycompany\Myservlet.class. What is the li
URI bit again.
You may refer to the attachments posted earlier.
Please let me know whether I have clarified your query.
Kind Regards,
Rahul
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> From: Caldarale, Charles R
> Subject: RE: RE: Tomcat 6.0.26 with Java 6 update 20 on S
> From: rahul [mailto:iamrahu...@yahoo.com]
> Subject: Fw: RE: Tomcat 6.0.26 with Java 6 update 20 on Sun Solaris 5.8
> Sparc - Web application unable to execute properly
>
> I installed Mozilla Firefox and on clicking "search" it printed out an
> error message that &
efox as well.
Best Regards,
Rahul
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, rahul wrote:
> From: rahul
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.26 with Java 6 update 20 on Sun Solaris 5.8 Sparc -
> Web application unable to execute properly
> To: "Tomcat Users List"
> Date: Thursday, July 1, 2010, 4:28
Thanks Pid. Your points noted.
Any pointers to the issues will be appreciated.
Kind Regards,
Rahul
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Pid wrote:
> From: Pid
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26 with Java 6 update 20 on Sun Solaris 5.8 Sparc -
> Web application unable to execute properly
> To: "
On 30/06/2010 23:58, rahul wrote:
> Is there any way I can give you a call, if you have any contact number?
See below.
>> No, replies should go only to the mailing list, not to
>> individuals.
We keep all discussions on the list, that way other people can learn
from them too. You can think o
I have become
a bit desperate now, trying to get some hint on this issue for around 2 days
now.:)
Your help is appreciated.
Best Regards,
Rahul
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> From: Caldarale, Charles R
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0.26 with Java 6 update 20 on Sun Solaris 5.8
> From: rahul [mailto:iamrahu...@yahoo.com]
> Subject: Tomcat 6.0.26 with Java 6 update 20 on Sun Solaris 5.8 Sparc -
> Web application unable to execute properly
>
> 5. Built and deployed the application in the UNIX itself.
If the application is pure Java, that step was unnecessary. What happen
Hi John.
Both John and I were right... Moving your directory outside ROOT was the
first step.
Now, in your web.xml, the element is wrong. It should
contain a servlet class that should be found under your WEB-INF/classes
directory. So if you want to reference the class that you have under
comlink
Hi Charles
This is my current structure.
C:\Tomcat 6.0\webapps\comlinks\WEB-INF\classes>
My web pages are in comlinks and java class files in classes
Are we getiing closer?
John
On 27 June 2010 18:17, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: John Byrne [mailto:jbmulti...@gmail.com]
>> Subje
Hi Shay
copy of directory structure
C:\Tomcat 6.0\webapps\comlinks\WEB-INF\classes>
I have changed this it incorporate your suggestions.
I attach a copy of web.xml
many thanks for your help.
Kind Regards
John
On 27 June 2010 15:54, Shay Rojansky wrote:
> John,
>
> Can you please send your
> From: John Byrne [mailto:jbmulti...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Tomcat 6.0.26
Thanks for the very specific version and installation information - quite
helpful.
> I use default install structure for tomcat. I add a applications
> folder under TOMCAT 6.0\webapps\ROOT\myfoloder
Which is the problem
John,
Can you please send your web.xml as well? I would be it's a misconfigured
in there (the WEB-INF should not be part of the class package
name, as it appears in your error log).
Shay
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 7:55 AM, John Byrne wrote:
> Hi
>
> Have installed tomcat 6.0.26 on windows 7.
>
>
On 26/06/2010 00:48, Felipe Maya wrote:
> What is the criteria for send a BAD REQUEST (400) using extensively
> Mutithread bulk calculation (50 per time) from TOMCAT with SQLSERVER?
>
> For extensively, I understand as constantly and many times.
>
> Server: CPU 2GHz 4 cores, Mem 8GB, (Linux Se
I just confirmed this myself 30 seconds before I received this :) After
comparing the AccessLogValve and FastCommonAccessLogValve sources between
5.5 and 6.0 it appears my colleague is correct; in 6.0 the additional
fields and methods of the Fast valve have been moved into the regular
AccessLogValv
On 07/05/2010 16:18, peter_f...@blm.gov wrote:
Sorry for so many questions in a short space of time. This is the last
question, I promise :)
The FastCommonAccessLogValve has been deprecated but the documentation
gives no reason why. Does anyone here know the reason? A colleague
suggested that t
cc
AM
Subject
RE: Tomcat 6.0.26
Please respond to Context/privileged
> From: peter_f...@blm.gov [mailto:peter_f...@blm.gov]
> Subject: Tomcat 6.0.26 Context/privileged
>
> that means that in effect all applications are running as if
> privileged by default.
No, that's not how it works. The WebappClassLoader chooses which parent in the
classloader hierarchy to d
Yes, they're from the Chat servlet, and that answers the question. Thank
you!
Konstantin Kolinko wrote on 05/07/2010 08:15:28
AM:
> 2010/5/7 :
> > If I run bin/startup.sh with the -security option switched on, I get a
> > couple of security exceptions thrown into catalina.out. Is this
expected
2010/5/7 :
> If I run bin/startup.sh with the -security option switched on, I get a
> couple of security exceptions thrown into catalina.out. Is this expected?
Those from "chat.ChatServlet" ? Yes, they are expected.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48218
gives details, if you
Am 06.05.2010 10:59, schrieb Pid:
On 06/05/2010 09:55, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
I moved to Windows 7 and I'm wondering whether it would be appropriate
to install the 64bit server or say with the
32bit version.
64bit JVM, not 'server'. Tomcat is agnostic with respect to bit counts.
On 06/05/2010 09:55, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> I moved to Windows 7 and I'm wondering whether it would be appropriate
> to install the 64bit server or say with the
> 32bit version.
64bit JVM, not 'server'. Tomcat is agnostic with respect to bit counts.
> What implications would it have? Memory
The + in that listing is saying that server.xml.orig has some extra
permissions that server.xml hasn't.
Windows permissions are not the same as Cygwin permissions. Use Windows
tools to inspect the permissions on both files, and use Windows tools to fix
the permissions on server.xml. Also, get us
2010/4/13 Peter Kovgan :
> I have simple and standard MyFaces app. deployed, that worked successfully on
> 6.0.18 tomcat on the same OS(Ubuntu kernel 2.6.31-20-generic, i686).
>
> After deploy on 6.0.26 it stops to work correctly.
>
For the #{} expressions to be recognized in Tomcat 6, your web
ap
Any chance that the stock scripts might someday use 'jsvc', since
Tomcat is set up to run that way? Then Tomcat can be easily started
as root (and won't have to worry about permission to create PID files)
but run as someone else.
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu
Balance
Am Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:16:36 -0400
schrieb "Eric B." :
> So what my init.d script currently does is pre-create an empty pid
> file in the /var/run directory, then changes ownership of it to
> "tomcat" so that tomcat can then update it with the actual pid of the
> tomcat process.
>
> Given that the
> From: Martin Gerdes [mailto:marting...@googlemail.com]
> Subject: Tomcat 6.0.26 pulled from mirrors?
>
> Why don't many mirrors carry 6.0.26 anymore?
Many, or one?
All the mirrors I've spot-checked on this side of the pond have 6.0.26.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AN
2010/3/26 Martin Gerdes :
> Why don't many mirrors carry 6.0.26 anymore?
> Instead they say that 6.0.24 is the current release!?
>
> This site doesn't carry 6.0.26 anymore:
> http://apache.mirror.digionline.de/tomcat/tomcat-6/
>
> This site does carry 6.0.26:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tom
On 26/03/2010 14:09, Martin Gerdes wrote:
> Why don't many mirrors carry 6.0.26 anymore?
> Instead they say that 6.0.24 is the current release!?
>
> This site doesn't carry 6.0.26 anymore:
> http://apache.mirror.digionline.de/tomcat/tomcat-6/
>
> This site does carry 6.0.26:
> http://www.apache.o
rson
>>
>> On 11 March 2010 18:09, Caldarale, Charles R
>> wrote:
>>>> From: emerson cargnin [mailto:echofloripa.y...@gmail.com]
>>>> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26 Download and Release Notes
>>>>
>>>> I can't see what are the changes f
URL of at least of of the hunderds of possible
mirrors you had tried, we could check that too.
Mark
>
> Regards
> Emerson
>
> On 11 March 2010 18:09, Caldarale, Charles R
> wrote:
>>> From: emerson cargnin [mailto:echofloripa.y...@gmail.com]
>>> Subject:
I am having issues to expand the tar.gz version, having tried several
different mirrors.
The zip works though.
Regards
Emerson
On 11 March 2010 18:09, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: emerson cargnin [mailto:echofloripa.y...@gmail.com]
>> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26 Download
> From: emerson cargnin [mailto:echofloripa.y...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.26 Download and Release Notes
>
> I can't see what are the changes from the 6.0.24.
The link is on the left hand side of the doc page.
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/changelog.html
2010/3/11 emerson cargnin :
> I managed to download from the main site, but inside the release notes
> I can't see what are the changes from the 6.0.24.
> Is there anywhere where I could find this info?
>
Wow. It synched. Finally.
I think you mean this document:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0
I managed to download from the main site, but inside the release notes
I can't see what are the changes from the 6.0.24.
Is there anywhere where I could find this info?
Emerson
On 11 March 2010 16:15, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/11/2010 05:03 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>
>> I guess we'll ha
On 03/11/2010 05:03 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
I guess we'll have to be patient.
Some problems with syncing to web server.
IT should solve this within 24 hours.
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr.
> From: emerson cargnin [mailto:echofloripa.y...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Tomcat 6.0.26 Download and Release Notes
>
> In the tomcat 6 download page, it says that 6.0.26 is available, but
> the links are broken:
>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/download-60.cgi
The 6.0.26 version isn't in the archives y
92 matches
Mail list logo
