> On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:42 PM, Mohan T wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> We are using tomcat 8.5.35 on SUse Linux.
>
> We are facing a issue while launching the help files.
> /
> We deployed the help files in the
> /home/ilas/tomcat8.5_tech/apache-tomcat-8.5.35/webapps/hub#rvwhelp.
>
> The he
Mohan,
On 7/11/21 01:41, Mohan T wrote:
We are using tomcat 8.5 on Suse linux. We would like to know the way
to load a property file.
I put the file in tomcat / lib folder.
Still I am getting the error
DEBUG 2021-07-11 07:56:15,108 [http-nio-8081-exec-8]
control.CompositeCacheManager - Inst
Mohan
[cid:image001.png@01D7678C.6CEA3650]
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas
Sent: 22 June 2021 16:27
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request for suggestion
CAUTION: You received this email from external Domain. Check reliability of
sender’s email ID
or here.
Mark
Kindly suggest how to proceed
Thanks
Mohan
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas
Sent: 22 June 2021 14:43
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request for suggestion
CAUTION: You received this email from external Domain. Check reliability of
sender’s email ID. Do not cl
: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request for suggestion
CAUTION: You received this email from external Domain. Check reliability of
sender’s email ID. Do not click links, open attachments unless you recognize
the sender and know the content is safe. – Ramco IMG
On 22/06/2021 07:40, Mohan T
On 22/06/2021 07:40, Mohan T wrote:
Hi,
We are using tomcat 8.5.35 on RHEL.
I have a .ear file that has a application.xml file in meta-inf folder. See
below the contents of the application.xml file .
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/application_1_2.dtd";>
Application WEB
RVWJ Application
ad
On 08.06.21 14:10, Emen-Eddine AISSAOUI wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am contacting you regarding the cipher suite recommandations for TLS and
> SSL for Tomcat.
>
> Could you please tell us which cipher suites are used and necessary and if
> there is any particular prequesites regarding TLS and SSL encr
If you can see the WSDL for the service assuming its a SOAP, then you can
actually generate a sample client XML using SOAP GUI clients and verify if
the service is actually deployed correctly
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, 7:59 AM Mounika Reddy wrote:
> Check if it's a malformed XML and namespaces qualifi
Check if it's a malformed XML and namespaces qualified are right. If JSON
it's a different issue and without much info, I hardly think it's a tomcat
issue
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, 7:51 AM Jonnalagadda, Swathi (External) <
swathi.jonnalaga...@xerox.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have a web application deploy
NoClassDefFoundError means that the class in question threw an exception
during its static initialisation phase. Then later on whenever some code
tries to access the class statically or create an instance the JVM will
throw a NoClassDefFoundError. This is not the same as a class not found
which rel
On 12/08/2020 17:50, Suraj Puvvada wrote:
> I'm trying to capture the request and response body for async servlets.
> Currently I'm using a filter to wrap the request and response via the
> HttpServletRequestWrapper and HttpServletResponseWrapper and wrap the
> InputStream and OutputStream objects
e case then one version is loaded, but when it tries to call
the method that it expects to have, the other version is found and the
method is not there.
Igal
>
> - -chris
>
> > -Original Message- From: James Moliere
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 7:53 PM To:
&
-- From: James Moliere
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 7:53 PM To:
> Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Request
> for Help
>
> Is the war file being built with maven? ...gradle? ...or using
> Eclipse?
>
> James
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:34 PM Mohan T wrote:
>
>>
: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 7:53 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Request for Help
Is the war file being built with maven? ...gradle? ...or using Eclipse?
James
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:34 PM Mohan T wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> In one of the environments we are using apach
Is the war file being built with maven? ...gradle? ...or using Eclipse?
James
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:34 PM Mohan T wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> In one of the environments we are using apache-tomcat-8.5.35.
>
>
>
> On server start we are getting this exception
>
> org.apache.catalina.core 28-
Hello Mohan,
please tell if you are using
1. the JSP technology inside the application
2. what JDK version on server-side
Kind regards
Peter Rader
--
Fachinformatiker AE / IT Software Developer
Peter Rader
Wilsnacker Strasse 17
10559 Berlin - GERMANY
Tel: 0049 (0)30 / 6 29 33 29 6
Fax: 0049 (0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Guido,
On 12/13/18 03:33, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
> Dear Mallory and Mark,
>
> then I'm the one of the rare who use an "unusual" setups for more
> than 10 years :) . On a staged farm of about 3*10 Tomcat's we run a
> whole bunch of "webapps"; most of t
ng the admin applications.
> This one is addressed via the http Connector.
What is unusual about that? Seems fairly standard virtual hosting to me.
Mark
>
> Guido
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, De
ginal Message-
>From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 3:26 PM
>To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Request for a technical review
>The first architecture diagram:
> - doesn't show any hosts
> - incorrectly classes a "Service
Appreciate your feedback, Mark. I'll get it incorporated ASAP.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 8:26 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 11/12/2018 19:20, Mallory Mooney wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > It's been a long time coming, so I wanted to resurrect this thread one
> more
> > time to share the now published pos
On 11/12/2018 19:20, Mallory Mooney wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> It's been a long time coming, so I wanted to resurrect this thread one more
> time to share the now published post. You can find it at
> https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/tomcat-architecture-and-performance/.
Now I can see the document without
Hi all!
It's been a long time coming, so I wanted to resurrect this thread one more
time to share the now published post. You can find it at
https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/tomcat-architecture-and-performance/.
I hope everyone has a great week!
Mallory
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:28 AM Mark Thomas
On 06/11/2018 00:02, Amit Pande wrote:
> Thanks Mark for the update. Seems like there is a potential bug in our client
> components which happened to keep on adding to existing header list.
>
> https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/config/http.html
>
> From the documentation:
>
> maxHttpHea
Thanks Mark for the update. Seems like there is a potential bug in our client
components which happened to keep on adding to existing header list.
https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/config/http.html
From the documentation:
maxHttpHeaderSize :The maximum size of the request and response H
On 03/11/2018 01:35, Amit Pande wrote:
> Thanks Chris. Yes, I will soon send out the patch for review.
Logically, I can see some hurdles for such a patch that are going to be
difficult to overcome.
Tomcat will process all of the received data up to the limit. It is on
the subsequent read to get m
On 02/11/2018 16:34, Mallory Mooney wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take a look
> at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down for this one
> by Thursday of next week (Nov. 8), so there's some time left if you are
> still wor
Thanks Chris. Yes, I will soon send out the patch for review.
Thanks,
Amit
On 11/2/18, 5:25 PM, "Christopher Schultz"
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Amit,
On 11/2/18 17:16, Amit Pande wrote:
> As per current implementation (below snippet i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Amit,
On 11/2/18 17:16, Amit Pande wrote:
> As per current implementation (below snippet is from 8.5.28), if
> the request header is too large (by default >8K, the default
> maxHttpHeaderSize), is thrown below error message is seen.
>
>
> For req
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mallory,
On 11/2/18 12:34, Mallory Mooney wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take
> a look at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down
> for this one by Thursday of next week (N
Hi everyone!
Just wanted to check-in to see if anyone has had the chance to take a look
at the draft and leave feedback. I'll be locking things down for this one
by Thursday of next week (Nov. 8), so there's some time left if you are
still working through it.
Have a great weekend!
On Fri, Oct 1
Hi all!
Just wanted to give you an update. I am working to get things for this
series wrapped up by the first week of November. Hopefully, that still
gives everyone enough time to review and leave any feedback.
Mallory
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:37 PM Mallory Mooney
wrote:
> Igal, it will be av
Igal, it will be available publicly once published! I don't have an
official publish date yet but can share that when it becomes more concrete.
And no PRs yet, Chris! It's still in the less cool GDoc stage of the review
process. :)
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM Igal Sapir wrote:
> On 10/12/20
On 10/12/2018 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mallory,
On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote:
I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out!
Here is the link to the GDoc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mallory,
On 10/12/18 13:23, Mallory Mooney wrote:
> I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out!
>
> Here is the link to the GDoc:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jg
UhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing
>
I definitely appreciate everyone's willingness to help out!
Here is the link to the GDoc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fudlXj055nnPd-1lUoAXIS2ge8qNI56_jgUhHgKczFE/edit?usp=sharing
Requesting access will still be needed, but I can grant that ASAP. I want
to make sure I can attribute comment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 10/10/18 6:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring Tomcat
>> (with or without Datadog). I'd love to get some feedback on the
>> techni
On 10/10/18 17:44, Mallory Mooney wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I work for Datadog and am writing a guide about monitoring Tomcat (with or
> without Datadog). I'd love to get some feedback on the technical content.
> The project maintainers we reached out to recommended we post a request
> here.
>
> Would
Hi Mallory,
I can have a look. Please let me know further details.
Thanks,
Deepak Behera
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 3/16/18 3:14 PM, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> I recently discovered some request attributes that I was curious
> about. Are these accurate across all connectors? Or are these the
> defaults for using something like the NIO connector? Specifi
On 16/03/18 19:14, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> I recently discovered some request attributes that I was curious about. Are
> these accurate across all connectors? Or are these the defaults for using
> something like the NIO connector?
> Specifically in my case, I am using the APR connector and
On 16/05/2016 10:40, Lyallex wrote:
> On 16 May 2016 at 07:49, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2016-05-14 15:06 GMT+03:00 Lyallex :
>>>
>>> I'm trying to find some documentation that details the request lifecycle
>>> I've looked in the obvious places ... and some not so obvious ones
>>>
>>>
Hi,
Is it same for tomcat ajp request execution flow?
Thanks
Venkata
-Original Message-
From: Lyallex [mailto:lyal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 3:10 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Request for documentation
On 16 May 2016 at 07:49, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>
On 16 May 2016 at 07:49, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2016-05-14 15:06 GMT+03:00 Lyallex :
>>
>> I'm trying to find some documentation that details the request lifecycle
>> I've looked in the obvious places ... and some not so obvious ones
>>
>> That is: NOT the servlet lifecycle documentati
Hi,
2016-05-14 15:06 GMT+03:00 Lyallex :
>
> I'm trying to find some documentation that details the request lifecycle
> I've looked in the obvious places ... and some not so obvious ones
>
> That is: NOT the servlet lifecycle documentation, this is a different
> thing entirely.
>
> I need some doc
Am 14.05.2016 um 14:06 schrieb Lyallex:
> I need some documentation that details exactly what happens when the
> fist bit of a request arrives at the server all the way through to
> when the last bit of the response leaves the server. Does any such
> documentation exit?
>
> Presumably the version
On 31/03/2014 17:43, Sebastien Tardif wrote:
> I understand that Tomcat currently doesn't always support specifying the
> context root to be used in a file inside the War.
That is not correct. Tomcat NEVER allows the context path to be defined
by a context.xml file within a WAR.
> Other web se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sebastien,
On 3/31/14, 12:43 PM, Sebastien Tardif wrote:
> I understand that Tomcat currently doesn't always support
> specifying the context root to be used in a file inside the War.
You are correct in that you cannot have a completely self-contai
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> As far as Glassfish versus Apache Tomcat goes, they address different use
> cases. Glassfish is a J2EE application server. Apache Tomcat is a servlet
> container. While you can convince Apache Tomcat to do a lot of things, at
> some point it's
On 3/31/2014 9:43 AM, Sebastien Tardif wrote:
I understand that Tomcat currently doesn't always support specifying
the context root to be used in a file inside the War.
Extract from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/context.html When
autoDeploy or deployOnStartup operations are per
Peter Rifel wrote:
From: Mark Thomas [ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 3:19 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Request Timeout and empty post data issue
On 26/12/2013 20:45, Peter Rifel wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently running T
On 26/12/2013 23:57, Peter Rifel wrote:
>
>>
>> From: Mark Thomas [ma...@apache.org]
>>
>> On 26/12/2013 20:45, Peter Rifel wrote:
>>>
>>> I noticed that our connector's connectionTimeout
>>> is set to 2ms, but it wouldn't make sense for that value to
>
>From: Mark Thomas [ma...@apache.org]
>Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 3:19 PM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: Re: Request Timeout and empty post data issue
>
>On 26/12/2013 20:45, Peter Rifel wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>&
On 26/12/2013 20:45, Peter Rifel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently running Tomcat 7.0.42 on Ubuntu 12.04 with OpenJDK
> 1.7.0_25. I'm using Apache Tomcat Native library 1.1.27 with APR
> version 1.4.6.
>
> I'm noticing in my access logs that some of our POST requests don't
> have any POST data a
>
>From: Jesse Barnum [jsb_tom...@360works.com]
>Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:14 PM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: Re: Request Timeout and empty post data issue
>
>One issue that will cause empty POST data to be received is if
Peter Rifel wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Preißer [kpreis...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:28 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Request Timeout and empty post data issue
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Peter Rifel [mailto:pri...
> From: André Warnier [a...@ice-sa.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:11 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Request Timeout and empty post data issue
>
>Peter Rifel wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm currently running Tomcat 7.0.42 on Ubuntu 12
One issue that will cause empty POST data to be received is if the POST data
size exceeds the value in the server.xml file:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/ajp.html
> The maximum size in bytes of the POST which will be handled by the container
> FORM URL parameter parsing. The li
Peter Rifel wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently running Tomcat 7.0.42 on Ubuntu 12.04 with OpenJDK 1.7.0_25. I'm
using Apache Tomcat Native library 1.1.27 with APR version 1.4.6.
I'm noticing in my access logs that some of our POST requests don't have any
POST data and all have response times of a f
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Preißer [kpreis...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:28 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Request Timeout and empty post data issue
>
>Hi,
>
>> -Original Message-
>&
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Rifel [mailto:pri...@mixpo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 9:45 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Request Timeout and empty post data issue
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently running Tomcat 7.0.42 on Ubuntu 12.04 with OpenJDK 1.7.0_25.
On 10/10/2013 15:18, RoseHosting Admin wrote:
> Please add us to the Contributors Group, so we can edit the Tomcat wiki.
>
> Username: RoseHosting
Done.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For ad
On 28/08/2013 10:24, Christine Thon wrote:
> Request to be added to the ContributersGroup to be able to append our
> company to the page "Tomcat SupportandTraining" since we offer training
> services on Tomcat.
>
> User name: GFUCyrusAG
>
> Thank you a lot for your Support!
Done. Happy editing!
2013/8/22 Luca Visconti :
> Hi,
>near four years ago I've inserted Open Gate in
> http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/SupportAndTraining
> I would like to update some information ( years of activity, links to logo,
> may be a special page on our web site dedicated to Tomcat ).
>
> Could someone admit
On 11/12/2012 22:00, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Can you start a new thread with a different subject? Something
> like "Tomcat prefers TC JSTL implementation to webapp-packaged one"
> and ask about it? I know there are some folks here who can describe
> how that's supposed to work. Once you've got
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Juha,
On 12/11/12 3:29 PM, Juha Laiho wrote:
> first, thanks for your answers, and also for the nits, they did
> hit some good points. Then on with some answers to the further
> questions you placed;
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Christ
Chirs,
first, thanks for your answers, and also for the nits, they did hit
some good points. Then on with some answers to the further
questions you placed;
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> On 12/10/12 5:40 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> I'll take a look. You def
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Juha,
On 12/10/12 5:40 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> On 12/10/12 4:14 PM, Juha Laiho wrote:
>
>> Any comments? Did I come across a but in Tomcat, or a "lucky
>> bug" in the application (i.e. something that worked by luck in
>> the previous conta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Juha,
On 12/10/12 4:14 PM, Juha Laiho wrote:
> I encountered an odd situation with request dispatching.
>
> In short, if the same request is first redirected using servlet
> API RequestDispatcher.forward(), and then via JSTL c:redirect using
> a re
>
>>
>
>
> Please, respond to comments/questions *below* the original, not on top of
> the email.
> It makes it a lot easier to follow the logical flow of questions/responses.
>
> About your original request : the Tomcat mentioned in
Tomcat's server.xml /have nothing to do/ with how your applicati
Harsimranjit singh Kler wrote:
External system can be jdbc ,soap ,rest or other different type of protocol
.So i dont have that freedom always.
Yes i agree i can do query timeout in Database case,but not in all External
system so i was thinking timeout from connector side.
Please, respond to c
External system can be jdbc ,soap ,rest or other different type of protocol
.So i dont have that freedom always.
Yes i agree i can do query timeout in Database case,but not in all External
system so i was thinking timeout from connector side.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:41 PM, chris derham wrote:
>
>
> Using tomcat 6.0.29.
>
> i want to know is there any parameter in HTTP\AJP connector to set
> request time out(i.e if particular request taking long time to complete it
> should time out after configured timeout value).?
>
> My web application communicating to some external system where res
For information of the list, this was first opened as a feature request:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53359 but after
discussion the following was implemented instead and will be in 7.0.28:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53373. Basically
whitespace is now a
On 04/06/2012 20:03, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Esmond,
>
> On 6/3/12 9:23 PM, Esmond Pitt wrote:
>> I have a large and growing number of requirements for aliases, and
>> the existing (new for Tomcat 7) aliases= attribute is unwieldy for
>> me. The line is already 289 characters long ;-(
>
>> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Esmond,
On 6/3/12 9:23 PM, Esmond Pitt wrote:
> I have a large and growing number of requirements for aliases, and
> the existing (new for Tomcat 7) aliases= attribute is unwieldy for
> me. The line is already 289 characters long ;-(
>
> It would be
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 21:02, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Francis,
>
> On 10/4/2011 2:50 PM, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
>> Patch attached. I didn't know Bugzilla would treat patches this
>> way...
>
> Can you give us a link to the bug?
>
https://i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francis,
On 10/4/2011 2:50 PM, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
> Patch attached. I didn't know Bugzilla would treat patches this
> way...
Can you give us a link to the bug?
> I implemented those two interfaces again, since the existing
> abstract class woul
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 20:43, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Francis,
>
> On 10/2/2011 3:57 PM, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 19:46, Konstantin Kolinko
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/10/2 Francis GALIEGUE :
>>
>>>
>>> 1. If you want to sub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francis,
On 10/2/2011 3:57 PM, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 19:46, Konstantin Kolinko
> wrote:
>> 2011/10/2 Francis GALIEGUE :
>
>>
>> 1. If you want to submit it as a patch for Tomcat, you should
>> attach it to a Bugzilla is
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 19:46, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/10/2 Francis GALIEGUE :
>
> 1. If you want to submit it as a patch for Tomcat, you should attach
> it to a Bugzilla issue.
OK, will do.
> 2. Coding conventions:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/getinvolved.html
> 3. ASF software is collec
2011/10/2 Francis GALIEGUE :
> Hello list,
>
> Given the problems I've had with the RemoteAddrValve, I have decided
> to try my hands at implementing a more sophisticated valve which acts
> more like Apache's allow/deny and which takes netmasks as arguments.
>
> Note, it has been compile tested onl
Pid * wrote:
>
>
> Exactly which version of Tomcat are you running?
>
>
Latest, 7.0.21.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Request-params-randomly-null-in-servlet%28s%29-tp32461421p32474158.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
On 15/09/2011 14:46, Darius D. wrote:
>
>
>
> Pid * wrote:
>>
>>
>> What is your server.xml config? (please remove comments, passwords etc
>> & post it inline, in the response)
>>
>>
>
> Here it is, nothing special ( except usage of RemoteIpValve ). Thanks for
> looking into this problem.
>
Pid * wrote:
>
>
> What is your server.xml config? (please remove comments, passwords etc
> & post it inline, in the response)
>
>
Here it is, nothing special ( except usage of RemoteIpValve ). Thanks for
looking into this problem.
On 14/09/2011 16:38, Darius D. wrote:
>
>> p
>>
>
> Well the problem is that we already looked for that mode of failure, our
> servlet class has 0 instance variables... Basically it is a method like i
> pasted before, doing HttpSession session = request.getSession(); and if
> session is valid (i
Pid * wrote:
>
> On 14/09/2011 11:55, Darius D. wrote:
>
> They are in *that* thread.
>
> It is possible to expose either request or response object outside of
> the scope of the thread, so a second request sees a modified version of
> the same object.
>
> E.g.
>
> public class SomeServlet
On 14/09/2011 11:55, Darius D. wrote:
>
>
>
> Pid * wrote:
>>
>> doProcess(req, res) is not a Servlet API method. What other method(s)
>> call it?
>>
>> Usually this type of thing occurs because the request (or response) is
>> being held as an instance field somewhere in a thread-unsafe way.
>>
Pid * wrote:
>
> doProcess(req, res) is not a Servlet API method. What other method(s)
> call it?
>
> Usually this type of thing occurs because the request (or response) is
> being held as an instance field somewhere in a thread-unsafe way.
>
>
It is called from:
public void doGet(H
On 14/09/2011 08:34, Darius D. wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we have a problem of request params beeing null in servlets where it
> shouldn't be ( post or get, in get we can even see that
> request.getQueryString() is fine, but params are null).
>
> It is more pronounced when using dedicated thread executo
>
>> On 01/06/2011 16:16, Marc Boorshtein wrote:
>>> So for some reason the addHeader is not doing anything
>>
>> I'm guessing you haven't looked at the source for this yet.
>>
>> org.apache.catalina.connector#addHeader(String,String) is a NOOP. It was
>> removed for Tomcat 7.
>>
>> You want:
>> re
To quote one of my favorite tv showswell there's your problem! Thanks,
I'll give this a try.
Marc
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 1, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 16:16, Marc Boorshtein wrote:
>> So for some reason the addHeader is not doing anything
>
> I'm guessing yo
On 01/06/2011 16:16, Marc Boorshtein wrote:
> So for some reason the addHeader is not doing anything
I'm guessing you haven't looked at the source for this yet.
org.apache.catalina.connector#addHeader(String,String) is a NOOP. It was
removed for Tomcat 7.
You want:
request.getCoyoteRequest().get
> Hi, Marc-
>
> Is that a carriage return and/or line feed before the attribute name in the
> log file or just the formatting of the e-mail?
>
> -Terence Bandoian
>
just email formatting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr..
>
> Can you try this:
>
> request.addHeader(attrib.getName(), val);
>
> logger.info("After added header: "
> + attrib.getName() + "="
> + request.getHeader(attrib.getName()));
>
> I wonder if the header value is being ignored because the request is
> frozen or someth
On 1:59 PM, Marc Boorshtein wrote:
Do you have any filters or other valves that might be wrapping the request and
choosing to ignore your extra headers?
No, the app is just a servlet that loops over all the headers and
cookies and generates a properties response
1) Show us your modified con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc,
On 5/31/2011 5:27 PM, Marc Boorshtein wrote:
>> 2) Show us your Valve code. (It is simple, right?)
>
> Iterator attribs = lastmile.getAttributes().iterator();
> while (attribs.hasNext()) {
>
So I tried moving the configuraiton of the valve into the app's
META-INF/context.xml with no success. One thing I didn't mention that
is interesting is that the I do set the request's setUserPrincipal(..)
and that works.
Thanks
Marc
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Marc Boorshtein wrote:
>>
>>
>
> Do you have any filters or other valves that might be wrapping the request
> and choosing to ignore your extra headers?
>
No, the app is just a servlet that loops over all the headers and
cookies and generates a properties response
> 1) Show us your modified conf/context.xml.
WE
> From: Marc Boorshtein [mailto:mboorsht...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Request headers created in valve don't make it to application
> The valve runs, the headers are added but they don't make it to
> the underlying web application.
Do you have any filters or other valves that might be wrapping the
nal Message-
>> From: Yuesong Wang
>> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:41
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: Re: Request Line Truncated and Caused 501
>>
>> Thanks. I tried 6.0.30, but under heavy load in our
>> production environment, its memory usage s
1 - 100 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
