I just checked - it's copied exactly. Sometimes I
drop characters when copying from emacs to Firefox.
Please see the following link under Mandatory
Directives
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/config/workers.html
Also, LoadModule must be used in the server config and
not in the VirtualHos
YES!
That was it. The following *MUST* be declared outside the
directive:
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties
JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log
JkLogLevel debug
As soon as they were moved outside the Directive the mod_jk.log
file has this allo
In looking at your config, I see that the word "type" is spelled "typw" Was
this copied directly from your actual config file?
worker.worker1.typw=ajp13
Just wondering . . .
Mark Eggers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just finally moved over to mod_jk from mod_jk2.
Since this is a develo
could it be that the loading of the module and the related configuration
?must? be outside of the section ?
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
kWorkersFile conf/workers.properties
JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log
JkLogLevel debug
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Connec
I just finally moved over to mod_jk from mod_jk2.
Since this is a development environment on
Windows/2000 Professional, I didn't have the pressure
to move.
Anyway, here's my environment:
Windows/2000 Professional
Apache 2.054 (will upgrade one of these days)
Tomcat 5.5.17
JDK 1.5.0_06-b05
Since
The server still fails with, "Internal Server Error"
(Note: I tested if Apache was even looking for the conf/workers.properties by
changing its name. When the file did not exist(conf/workersA.properties),
Apache would not start. When the file was there (conf/workers.properties)
Apache star
What happens when you drop the full paths in favor of relative paths to
the Apache directory as in:
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DocumentRoot /www/sandbox
ServerName dummy-host.example.com
ErrorLog logs/172.27.224.236.error.log
CustomLog logs/172.27.224.236.access.log common
LoadModule jk_modul
Yes, I am able to access all web apps that are using ajp13.
The only one that does not work is the "/MGGWebApp" which uses worker1
The ajp13 is configured in the server.xml file. That is the only reference to
it.
David Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I meant in this snippet of your Apac
the mod_jk.nlm and nsapi.nlm
win32/i386 Contains the mod_jk.dll for Windows as well as other useful
binaries.
-Original Message-
From: David Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:39 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connector Problems -
Past thread
I meant in this snippet of your Apache httpd.conf, you have:
JkMount /axis ajp13
JkMount /axis/* ajp13
JkMount /servlets-examples ajp13
JkMount /servlets-examples/* ajp13
JkMount /jsp-examples ajp13
JkMount /jsp-examples/* ajp13
JkMount /MGGWebApp worker1
JkMount /MGGWebApp/* worker1
Where we s
Yes, the ajp13 connector is working great. It is configured in server.xml as:
Is this what your were looking for ? ? ?
David Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Past thread have effectively said use the .so with Apache even though
you might be on Windows. In reality I would think the
mod_jk.nlm and nsapi.nlm
win32/i386 Contains the mod_jk.dll for Windows as well as other useful
binaries.
-Original Message-
From: David Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:39 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connector Problems -
Past thread have
Past thread have effectively said use the .so with Apache even though
you might be on Windows. In reality I would think the error would be
much different if Apache couldn't load mod_jk.so.
Your Apache config mentions use of a worker named ajp13. Is that one
working, and if so, where is it co
I used the .so file from the following link:
http://apache.seekmeup.com/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/win32/jk-1.2.18/
where there are no .DLL files only .so files. Also, there are several .so
files in my apache/modules directory.
"Sharma, Siddharth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LoadModule jk_module "C:/Program Files/Apache
> Group/Apache2/modules/mod_jk.so"
Since you have windows, shouldn't the mod_jk load library be a dll rather
than so?
I believe you have referenced the incorrect mod_jk.
-Original Message-
From: M. Goodell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sen
15 matches
Mail list logo