Re: log4j CVE general question

2021-12-13 Thread Christopher Schultz
chris -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 11:39 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: log4j CVE general question Jon, On 12/13/21 11:51, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: So, based on these entries on the log4j apache pages, I c

RE: log4j CVE general question

2021-12-13 Thread jonmcalexander
lease advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. > -Original Message- > From: jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID > > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 11:48 AM > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: RE: log

RE: log4j CVE general question

2021-12-13 Thread jonmcalexander
our cooperation. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Schultz > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 11:39 AM > To: users@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: log4j CVE general question > > Jon, > > On 12/13/21 11:51, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: > > So, bas

Re: log4j CVE general question

2021-12-13 Thread Christopher Schultz
Jon, On 12/13/21 11:51, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: So, based on these entries on the log4j apache pages, I can't see that any 1x product is vulnerable. Mark, is there some message from Apache that we can share with those that need to know that for certain 1x log4j is NOT vulner