Dear All,
Please accept my heartily thanks for your valuable responses.
*Daniel / Chris*,
Thank you so much. You both gave me a vary helpful explanation. I have read
many forums but still was confused but you guys have cleared my doubts and
also gave me new ideas to do better.
Thank you again.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saurabh,
On 3/31/14, 7:05 AM, Saurabh Saraswat wrote:
> I am doing connection pooling with tomcat 6. And i am doing this
> very first time before today i had no idea about connection
> pooling. I want to ensure that it is the correct way or not.
Gl
On Mar 31, 2014, at 7:05 AM, Saurabh Saraswat
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am doing connection pooling with tomcat 6. And i am doing this very first
> time before today i had no idea about connection pooling. I want to ensure
> that it is the correct way or not.
> Please do me correct if i am doing
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Propes, Barry L
wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Shifman [mailto:mark.shif...@yale.edu]
> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 12:34 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Connection pooling issue on Tomcat
>
> ===
-Original Message-
From: Mark Shifman [mailto:mark.shif...@yale.edu]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 12:34 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connection pooling issue on Tomcat
On 03/28/2014 11:58 AM, Propes, Barry L wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm using Tomcat 6.0.29 for a
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 11:13 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connection pooling issue on Tomcat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Barry,
On 3/28/14, 11:58 AM, Propes, Barry L
On 03/28/2014 11:58 AM, Propes, Barry L wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm using Tomcat 6.0.29 for an app I've had in place for years. I run the Java
app I have on a Windows 2003 server for my production region, but have local
builds on both my desktop and laptop, both of which are Windows XP Pro. Yes, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Barry,
On 3/28/14, 11:58 AM, Propes, Barry L wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm using Tomcat 6.0.29 for an app I've had in place for years. I
> run the Java app I have on a Windows 2003 server for my production
> region, but have local builds on both my de
ive should have?
-Original Message-
From: Terence M. Bandoian [mailto:tere...@tmbsw.com]
Sent: 21 Nov 2011 16 11
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connection pooling issue with
MySQLNonTransientConnectionException and Java webapp
On 1:59 PM, Martin O'Shea wrote:
Caused by:
com.mysql.j
On 21 Nov 2011, at 21:25, Martin O'Shea wrote:
Well, I hope I’m reading VisualVM correctly, because when I run the JMeter
test first time around, I see 40 ‘connector’ threads created in VisualVM,
all of which run for so long and then return to a wait state.
I always forget to tell people to get
On 21 Nov 2011, at 20:09, Martin O'Shea wrote:
> Are you able to provide any more information about what I am actually
> looking for in VisualVM?
Depends how you defined the Db. Did you define a global Resource in server.xml?
Or perhaps in conf/context.xml?
p
>
-
Well, I hope I'm reading VisualVM correctly, because when I run the JMeter
test first time around, I see 40 'connector' threads created in VisualVM,
all of which run for so long and then return to a wait state.
And if I run the test again several times in succession, the number of
connector th
Are you able to provide any more information about what I am actually
looking for in VisualVM?
Tomcat
> maxActive should have?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Terence M. Bandoian [mailto:tere...@tmbsw.com]
> Sent: 21 Nov 2011 16 11
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Connection pooling issue with
> MySQLNonTransientConnectionException and Java weba
On 21 Nov 2011, at 16:11, "Terence M. Bandoian" wrote:
>
> On 1:59 PM, Martin O'Shea wrote:
>> Caused by:
>> com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLNonTransientConnectionException: Data
>> source rejected establishment of connection, message from server: "Too many
>> connections"
>
> I'd check int
. Bandoian [mailto:tere...@tmbsw.com]
Sent: 21 Nov 2011 16 11
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connection pooling issue with
MySQLNonTransientConnectionException and Java webapp
On 1:59 PM, Martin O'Shea wrote:
> Caused by:
> com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLNonTransientConnectionExce
On 1:59 PM, Martin O'Shea wrote:
Caused by:
com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLNonTransientConnectionException: Data
source rejected establishment of connection, message from server: "Too many
connections"
I'd check into this.
-Terence Bandoian
---
Usually the connection is initialised as null and then assigned inside
the try block. What happens if the method above throws an error after
a connection is removed from the pool?
To try to answer this, the sample code provided is illustrative of my DAO
classes generally. The following is
On 21 Nov 2011, at 09:28, "app...@dsl.pipex.com" wrote:
> Hello
>
> I don't think this is a Tomcat issue but I thought I would post here just in
> case.
>
> I have a Java, JSP and MySQL application running under Apache Tomcat 6.0.26
> which I've been testing with JMeter.
> What I find is that f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Krish,
On 9/28/2011 5:51 PM, rad muthu wrote:
> I am looking for DB2 connection pooling configuration used in DB2.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=DB2+connection+pooling+configuration+used+in+DB2
http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
- -chris
-B
On 04/11/2010 05:50, mike houston wrote:
> Hi..
>
> Is there a framework for implementing database connection pooling in tomcat
> 6?
> I am migrating my application from tomcat 4 to 6. There is already a
> connection pooling implemented for the sql2000 server using the MS pool.exe
> framework. But
--- On Wed, 11/3/10 at 10:30 PM, mike houston wrote:
> Can you please explain to me in
> detail.
>
> Thanks,
> M
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=tomcat+6+dbcp&l=1
- Bob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apach
Can you please explain to me in detail.
Thanks,
M
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Will Sumekar wrote:
> you can use commons dbcp or c3p0 that are available openly.
>
>
> Will
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:50 PM, mike houston >wrote:
>
> > Hi..
> >
> > Is there a framework for implementing dat
you can use commons dbcp or c3p0 that are available openly.
Will
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:50 PM, mike houston wrote:
> Hi..
>
> Is there a framework for implementing database connection pooling in tomcat
> 6?
> I am migrating my application from tomcat 4 to 6. There is already a
> connection
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: Connection Pooling questions
>
> Actually, I can't think of a reason why you'd have to use the unwrapped
> version of the statement or result set (or even connection) to perform
> state ma
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: Connection Pooling questions
>
> I think the JDBC spec should strengthen your faith at least
> in the correctness of this behavior...
I wasn't questioning the correctness of the intended beh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
On 4/1/2009 11:25 AM, David Smith wrote:
> This is assuming the developer didn't unwrap any of the DBCP objects to
> access driver specific features. In that case, the original wrapped
> objects need to be maintained and closed instead of the u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 4/1/2009 10:47 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Shaun Farrugia [mailto:sfarru...@fry.com]
>> Subject: RE: Connection Pooling questions
>>
>> What happens when the statement isn't closed but the
>>
-
From: Shaun Farrugia [mailto:sfarru...@fry.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:00 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Connection Pooling questions
Sweet,
I set up a test.jsp page that will Connection.close() without rs.close() and
ps.close(). Will let you know the results..
And
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Shaun Farrugia [mailto:sfarru...@fry.com]
>> Subject: RE: Connection Pooling questions
>>
>> What happens when the statement isn't closed but the
>> connection is returned to the pool?
>>
>
> The connection
> From: Shaun Farrugia [mailto:sfarru...@fry.com]
> Subject: RE: Connection Pooling questions
>
> Are there any changes to DBCP other than package moves?
No, just the package renaming to avoid collisions.
> Can I utilize the DBCP source package and expect that it's
>
Connection Pooling questions
> From: Shaun Farrugia [mailto:sfarru...@fry.com]
> Subject: RE: Connection Pooling questions
>
> What happens when the statement isn't closed but the
> connection is returned to the pool?
The connection object your code sees isn't the real connect
> From: Shaun Farrugia [mailto:sfarru...@fry.com]
> Subject: RE: Connection Pooling questions
>
> What happens when the statement isn't closed but the
> connection is returned to the pool?
The connection object your code sees isn't the real connection; it's a w
Pretty sure it's a rogue connection that stays open.
-Original Message-
From: Shaun Farrugia [mailto:sfarru...@fry.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 9:13 AM
To: Tomcat Users List; allen.ir...@smartintegration.com.au;
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com
Subject: RE: Connection Po
. Thanks again!
Original Message:
-
From: Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:44:32 -0500
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: Connection Pooling questions
> From: allen.ir...@smartintegration.com.au
> [mailto:allen.ir...@smartintegration.
Yes! And also, close out any other connections that may be embedded, like a
prepared statement, result set or stored procedure. These will also show that a
connection is still opened if not explicitly closed!
-Original Message-
From: allen.ir...@smartintegration.com.au
[mailto:allen.ir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 3/31/2009 10:57 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: allen.ir...@smartintegration.com.au
>> Subject: Connection Pooling questions
>>
>> I do close the connections within my program using conn.close();
>
> The evidence suggests otherwise
ssage:
-
From: Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:44:32 -0500
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: Connection Pooling questions
> From: allen.ir...@smartintegration.com.au
> [mailto:allen.ir...@smartintegration.com.au]
> Subject:
> From: allen.ir...@smartintegration.com.au
> [mailto:allen.ir...@smartintegration.com.au]
> Subject: RE: Connection Pooling questions
>
>type="javax.sql.DataSource"
> driverClassName="com.attunity.jdbc.NvDriver"
> url=&
ssage:
-
From: Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:57:01 -0500
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: Connection Pooling questions
> From: allen.ir...@smartintegration.com.au
> [mailto:allen.ir...@smartintegration.com.au]
> Subject: Conne
:
-
From: Martin Gainty mgai...@hotmail.com
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:33:36 -0400
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: Connection Pooling questions
the configuration you describe only defines parameters to be passed to the
Connection Pool Library..which connection pool library are you
> From: allen.ir...@smartintegration.com.au
> [mailto:allen.ir...@smartintegration.com.au]
> Subject: Connection Pooling questions
>
> I configure it using the suggested /META-INF/context.xml with:
> maxActive="30" maxIdle="10"
Post your entire context.xml so we can see the rest of the element.
the configuration you describe only defines parameters to be passed to the
Connection Pool Library..which connection pool library are you using?
are you using Thread starve algorithm? or explicit no-activity-on-connection
algorithm?
Most connection pools with close the connection only after stat
, jfk
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 4:05 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connection Pooling and Teradata
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John,
Christopher Schultz wrote:
| I use log4j, and have it corr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John,
Christopher Schultz wrote:
| I use log4j, and have it correctly configured to use log4j in my
| application, so I added:
|
| log4j.category.org.apache.tomcat.dbcp=ALL
I followed the instructions on this page
(http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Connection Pooling and Teradata
>
> Perhaps it's because DBCP is loaded by TC before my
> webapp, so it's using a differently-configured logger.
I believe that's the case - different classloade
There real unfortunate part with regard to log4j is the actual manual
has to be purchased. The site docs are horribly lacking.
Having said that ... I suspect because the DBCP pool is created by
tomcat in tomcat's internal code, it has a different log factory
instance and as a result, a diffe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John,
Katilie, John wrote:
| Chris, 1st I tried adding log4j.properies [...]
I use log4j, and have it correctly configured to use log4j in my
application, so I added:
log4j.category.org.apache.tomcat.dbcp=ALL
to my log4j.properties file, and that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John,
Katilie, John wrote:
| Chris, 1st I tried adding log4j.properies [...]
Take a look at all the messages running around the list this week about
logging. Apparently, it's rocket science.
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.
Regards, John Katilie.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:16 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connection Pooling and Teradata
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John,
Katilie, John wrote:
| Chris, Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John,
Katilie, John wrote:
| Chris, Thanks for your reply. I'll do some more testing. May i ask a
| dumb question? How did you turn on your tracing to get:
I used the tracing provided by my JDBC driver (Connector/J), so you
won't have this exact opt
er Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 9:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connection Pooling and Teradata
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Katilie,
Katilie, John wrote:
| Basically, I have a web application that communicates with Teradata
| un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Katilie,
Katilie, John wrote:
| Basically, I have a web application that communicates with Teradata
| under Tomcat using a DBCP pooled connection. In my context.xml file I
| have:
[snip]
| validationQuery="Select 1"
[snip]
| Via JNDI we get
Hmm. I think the answer here is one of resource starvation - the
resource in this case being the CPU. It seems that core of your test is
'Select * from table1'
Where is the database? Is it another application on the same box? What
mechanism do you use to connect between the database and the a
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Daad,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | No, my test is done with threads that connect using sockets. Server
> | listen with ServerSocket and 30 Threads are started connecting to it.
>
> Er... did you write your own server, or are you using Tomcat
> I haven't looked at the source, but I'm willing to bet there is at least
> one sync block -- the pooling implementation would have to perform a
> brief sync when it borrows a connection object from the pool. In
> addition, if this is from a fresh startup of tomcat without a minIdle
> setting (de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daad,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| No, my test is done with threads that connect using sockets. Server
| listen with ServerSocket and 30 Threads are started connecting to it.
Er... did you write your own server, or are you using Tomcat?
I'm sorry...
I haven't looked at the source, but I'm willing to bet there is at least
one sync block -- the pooling implementation would have to perform a
brief sync when it borrows a connection object from the pool. In
addition, if this is from a fresh startup of tomcat without a minIdle
setting (default=
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Daad,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | i think i don't get the utility of a connection pooling, since i have
> this situation: 30 threads try to perform at same time a db access with
> the call:
> |
> | new Database().doSomething()
>
> Are you s
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Daad,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | I missed some messages seems.. So is the enqueuing thing a bad
> | behaviour of pooling or is it just normal?
>
> I suspect you have a problem with your code, somewhere. Are you creating
> a new Database ob
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Connection pooling again
> >
> > what should i ask to check to the db admin?
>
> Start with: does the db limit the number of connections from a given
> client (which in this case, is the box T
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Connection pooling again
>
> what should i ask to check to the db admin?
Start with: does the db limit the number of connections from a given
client (which in this case, is the box Tomcat is running on)?
> Ho
> Your queueing problem most likely has nothing to do with the pooling
> capability but rather with your app, your database, or your test driver.
>
> 1) If the test driver is browser based (e.g., Java script), you're
> limited to two connections to a given server. If your test driver is
> using so
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Connection pooling again
>
> So is the enqueuing thing a bad behaviour of pooling or is it
> just normal?
Your queueing problem most likely has nothing to do with the pooling
capability but rather with your app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daad,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I missed some messages seems.. So is the enqueuing thing a bad
| behaviour of pooling or is it just normal?
I suspect you have a problem with your code, somewhere. Are you creating
a new Database object every time? D
want to partecipate... thanks
-- Initial Header ---
>From : "Christopher Schultz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : "Tomcat Users List" users@tomcat.apache.org
Cc :
Date : Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:58:58 -0400
Subject : Re: Connection pooling agai
Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
| You should get DataSource object from JNDI
| first, and then pass it to other threads. Every thread should just call
| DataSource.getConnection().
That's a bad idea. The reason you store the DataSource in JNDI is so
that it is universally ava
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mikolaj,
Mikolaj Rydzewski wrote:
| JNDI lookups are expensive.
No, they're not. We're not talking about using a remote JNDI server or
AD or anything like that. This is all local and the lookups are very fast.
To convince yourself, run this simple
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think i don't get the utility of a connection pooling, since i have this
situation: 30 threads try to perform at same time a db access with the call:
new Database().doSomething()
JNDI lookups are expensive. You should get DataSource object from JNDI
first, and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daad,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| i think i don't get the utility of a connection pooling, since i have
this situation: 30 threads try to perform at same time a db access with
the call:
|
| new Database().doSomething()
Are you sure you're using your
because i do from same ip (mine)?
-- Initial Header ---
>From : "Caldarale, Charles R" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : "Tomcat Users List" users@tomcat.apache.org
Cc :
Date : Wed, 9 Apr 2008 06:18:40 -0500
Subject : RE: Connection pooling
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Connection pooling again
>
> i think i don't get the utility of a connection pooling,
> since i have this situation: 30 threads try to perform at
> same time a db access with the call:
Are you running the 30 client requests from a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daad,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| i'm using tomcat 5.5.9 for a web server application where many
| clients connect and do stuffs. each time they login to the server,
| for example, a database query is performed. Application works, but
| reading
|
http
I sent him the driver.
-Original Message-
From: Dirk Weigenand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 7:16 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connection Pooling
Hi,
you should try to use a dedicated worker process for connections.
Oracle by defaults spawns
abhishek reddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: "Tomcat Users List"
> Betreff: Re: Connection Pooling
> thanks Mr Adam Gordon for the reply,
>
> Can u tell me how to determine why oracle is generating those many
> processes?
> Also tell me where to check the
thanks Mr Adam Gordon for the reply,
Can u tell me how to determine why oracle is generating those many processes?
Also tell me where to check the number of oracle processes in use and
how to reduce it?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:18 AM, Adam Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I think you may
dle
> 15
>
>
> maxWait
> 7000
>
>
> removeAbandoned
> true
>
>
> removeAbandonedTimeout
> 60
>
>
> logAbandoned
> true
>
>
>
> minEvictableIdleTimeMillis
> 5000
>
leIdleTimeMillis
5000
timeBetweenEvictionRunsMillis
1
testWhileIdle
true
-Original Message-
From: Adam Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 4:49 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connection Pooling
Hi, I think you may be confusing t
Hi, I think you may be confusing the number of allowable processes with
the number of allowable threads.
Per Tomcat's documentation, maxActive refers to the maximum number of DB
connections whereas the Oracle error you are seeing refers to the
maximum number of processes (threads?) which are n
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 8:24 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connection pooling
Hi! Thanks...
With the following configuration i get the
error:DatasourceConnectionProvider - Could not find datasource:
java:/comp/env/ehr
With Resoruce name = "ehr" works fine bu
> From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Connection pooling
>
> With the following configuration i get the
> error:DatasourceConnectionProvider - Could not find datasource:
> java:/comp/env/ehr
> name to "jdbc/ehr" then the name on the con
Every db execution creates a new session.
Each session dropped correctly after db execution.
Is it supposed I see 5 (new) connections to database after tomcat restart?
Thanks
On Jan 11, 2008 2:24 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Connection pooling
>
> The following configuration was not supposed to be created 5
> connections at first get connection execution?
Not quite sure how to parse the above sentence, but the config should
have created five connections at ini
Hi! Thanks...
With the following configuration i get the
error:DatasourceConnectionProvider - Could not find datasource:
java:/comp/env/ehr
With Resoruce name = "ehr" works fine but pooling is disable. I
don't know if paramenters initalLimit, minLimit are defined correctly.
Could you help me t
Andrew-
The first thing I noticed is your Resource name shoule be "jdbc/ehr"
replace server_name with the actual server name
replace the SID with the Service ID you will be using (check the
tnsnames.ora for SID)
http://www.microdeveloper.com/html/JNDI_Orcl_Tomcat1p.html
Martin
- Original Mess
> From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Connection pooling, is it the right way to do it?
>
> The ones in SVN. You won't see it on the web site until
> the next release is made.
Here's the SVN link:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tom
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Connection pooling, is it the right way to do it?
>
> Which docs?
The ones in SVN. You won't see it on the web site until the next
release is made.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL
> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> > Looks like the analogous constraint on the docBase attribute has
> > disappeared from the doc. When docBase is specified and the target is
> > under the appBase directory, the deployment is likely to become
> > corrupted or occur twice.
>
> I have updated the doc
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> Looks like the analogous constraint on the docBase attribute has
> disappeared from the doc. When docBase is specified and the target is
> under the appBase directory, the deployment is likely to become
> corrupted or occur twice.
I have updated the docs.
Mark
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To whom it may concern,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And there is the ?autoReconnect=true option to url parameters too..
> just to show that i got the code from an official jakarta tomcat page
> :)
Unfortunately, that page could use some re-writing. Fo
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Connection pooling, is it the right way to do it?
> >
> > I can find the part where doc says that context shouldn't be
> > put in server.xml but in context.xml, but can't see the part
ok thanks
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Connection pooling, is it the right way to do it?
> >
> > I can find the part where doc says that context shouldn't be
> > put in server.xml but in context.xml, but can't
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Connection pooling, is it the right way to do it?
>
> I can find the part where doc says that context shouldn't be
> put in server.xml but in context.xml, but can't see the part
> where docbase and
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Connection pooling, is it the right way to do it?
> >
> > at this link
> > http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2006/04/19/database-connect
> > ion-pooling-with-tomcat.html i see the two par
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Connection pooling, is it the right way to do it?
>
> at this link
> http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2006/04/19/database-connect
> ion-pooling-with-tomcat.html i see the two parameters, but i
> supp
Sorry I didn't respond earlier -- it's been a busy weekend. Comments
inline...
--David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
1. Your docBase and path attributes are at best optional. As long as
your context.xml is delivered in your webapp's META-INF folder, it
should be used automagically.
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Connection pooling, is it the right way to do it?
> >
> > I'm using Tomcat 5.5.9.
>
> Which is nearly 2.5 years old. Anytime you utilize invalid parameters,
> you run the risk of encounter
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Connection pooling, is it the right way to do it?
>
> I'm using Tomcat 5.5.9.
Which is nearly 2.5 years old. Anytime you utilize invalid parameters,
you run the risk of encountering undefined behavior in
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Connection pooling, is it the right way to do it?
> >
> > Ok, once remove those 2 attributes, the rest is fine and good
> > to be used?
>
> Probably, but you'll have to try it. You n
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Connection pooling, is it the right way to do it?
>
> Ok, once remove those 2 attributes, the rest is fine and good
> to be used?
Probably, but you'll have to try it. You never did mention what version
of
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
