-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin,
On 4/22/2010 5:53 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/4/23 Christopher Schultz :
>> I'd love to see the code that enforces this.
>
> Search for "applicationDispatcher.specViolation.request" and
> "applicationDispatcher.specViolation.resp
2010/4/23 Christopher Schultz :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Konstantin,
>
> On 4/22/2010 4:53 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2010/4/23 Kris Schneider :
>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
>>> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 4/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin,
On 4/22/2010 4:53 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/4/23 Kris Schneider :
>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
>> wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
If [th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kris,
On 4/22/2010 4:48 PM, Kris Schneider wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
>> The following filter works as expected on Tomcat 6.0.26 (some changes
>> were required to make it actually work... my off-the-cuff
2010/4/23 Kris Schneider :
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
>>> If [the request/filter] does a forward or include done the line, this
>>> won't work with any remotely recent version of
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bill,
>
> On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
>> If [the request/filter] does a forward or include done the line, this
>> won't work with any remotely recent version of Tomcat. T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
> If [the request/filter] does a forward or include done the line, this
> won't work with any remotely recent version of Tomcat. These
> versions enforce the spec requirement that the Request has to be a
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bill,
>
> On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
>>> It's pretty inaccessible for novice Java programmers, but you could use
>>> the "proxy" API which is [just] about the coolest thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
>> It's pretty inaccessible for novice Java programmers, but you could use
>> the "proxy" API which is [just] about the coolest thing available in
>> Java IMO.
>
> If it does a forward or include done the
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
>
>
> "Christopher Schultz" wrote in message
> news:4bcf5f41.6060...@christopherschultz.net...
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> André,
>>
>> On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
>>>
>>> Mark Thomas wrote:
>
On 21/04/2010 19:52, André Warnier wrote:
> Hi.
> A while ago, I wrote a servlet filter which has served me well since, to
> wrap a servlet for which I do not have nor can obtain the source code,
> and of which I only generally know what it does.
> Now it seems that with a new version of this servl
"Christopher Schultz" wrote in message
news:4bcf5f41.6060...@christopherschultz.net...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD an
Mark, Chris and Kris, thanks.
You have all impressed the hell out of me.
You have also lost me.. at a guess about 50 lines ago.
But I get the idea, and it is nice to learn that such things exist.
I also believe this may be helpful to someone else some day looking for
a solution to a case much mor
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> André,
>
> On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
>> Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
> I'd just use JAD a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
>>> Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
>>> Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxio
On 21/04/2010 20:46, André Warnier wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
>>> Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
>>> Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
>>> anything of the kind, I would not
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under suspicion of
reverse-engineering. So is ther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:24 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
> ...
>
>>
>> I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
>>
> Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
> anything of the kind, I would not want to even come u
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
> ...
>
>>
>> I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
>>
> Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
> anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under suspicion of
> reverse-engineering. So is there so
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under suspicion of
reverse-engineering. So is there something that just lists the standard
calls/methods used
On 21/04/2010 19:52, André Warnier wrote:
> Hi.
> A while ago, I wrote a servlet filter which has served me well since, to
> wrap a servlet for which I do not have nor can obtain the source code,
> and of which I only generally know what it does.
> Now it seems that with a new version of this servl
Hi.
A while ago, I wrote a servlet filter which has served me well since, to
wrap a servlet for which I do not have nor can obtain the source code,
and of which I only generally know what it does.
Now it seems that with a new version of this servlet, the servlet itself
crashes when wrapped by m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kenneth,
Kenneth Westelinck wrote:
| Did a quick test on 1.6.0 update 2 and the static block does get called. I
| guess this is a bug.
Er, this code doesn't look like it should compile:
|> class Foo {
|>
|> private static int;
|>
Isn't there
Also, When you say not called. Did you trace it through the debugger?
Could there also be some optimization going on here?
jfk
-Original Message-
From: Jim Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:05 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: OT: a java question
> From: Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: OT: a java question - static initialization
>
> class Foo {
>private static int;
> static {
> a = 100;
> }
> Foo() {
> }
> }
>
> Class.forName("packa
On Feb 20, 2008 10:47 AM, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> class Foo {
>
>private static int;
>
> static {
> a = 100;
> }
>
> Foo() {
>
> }
>
> }
>
> Class.forName("package.Foo").newInstance();
>
> The static init block of Foo is not called.
>
> I a
Did a quick test on 1.6.0 update 2 and the static block does get called. I
guess this is a bug.
On Feb 20, 2008 4:47 PM, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> class Foo {
>
> private static int;
>
> static {
> a = 100;
> }
>
> Foo() {
>
> }
>
> }
>
> Class.forName(
class Foo {
private static int;
static {
a = 100;
}
Foo() {
}
}
Class.forName("package.Foo").newInstance();
The static init block of Foo is not called.
I am using Java 1.5 update14. It is a bug?
Thanks
Da
> > Is there anyway to check this theory?
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Peter Crowther
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 11:22 AM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: RE: Java
:22 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Java Question
>
> > From: Andrew English
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I have looked for the filenames.* on all the
> servers
> > including the linux
> > ones and not come up with anything except for
> what
> From: Andrew English [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is there anyway to check this theory?
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Crowther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
> I suspect an operations issue. Has someone configured a revision
> control system (such as CVS or Subversion) on the prod
is the oldest
version they have information on. :(
Thanks
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Parsons Technical Services [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:15 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Java Question
Okay. Now for a few of my hair brain ideas. Every
data(code written to
do it), it is about the only way data is going to be removed.
Doug
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew English" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List"
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 5:47 PM
Subject: RE: Java Question
Thanks for
rabhu (Cognizant)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 5:18 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Java Question
Andrew,
You will be surprised but here is what it is:
JBoss is actually sending the calls made to your production server to
the test server. This is because o
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:12 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Java Question
Does anyone know of a mailing list were I can ask some java related
questions?
The number one question I have is if it's possible to write code within
Java that changes all your HTML
search for USB-Java and javaspain in www.yahoogroups.com
Mauricio Fernandez A.
Ingeniero de Sistemas
Universidad Autonoma de Manizales
-Mensaje original-
De: Andrew English [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: miercoles, 22 febrero, 2006 16:12
Para: Tomcat Users List
Asunto: Java
Is there anyway to check this theory?
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Peter Crowther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 11:22 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Java Question
> From: Andrew English [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have looked f
> From: Andrew English [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have looked for the filenames.* on all the servers
> including the linux
> ones and not come up with anything except for what's on the
> two servers.
I suspect an operations issue. Has someone configured a revision
control system (such as CV
List
Subject: RE: Java Question
I have looked for the filenames.* on all the servers including the linux
ones and not come up with anything except for what's on the two servers.
I have not had a chance to check all the jar files, are ear files like
jar files if so what's a good tool for op
s?
Thanks
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Robert Harper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:10 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Java Question
Are the pages static or is there some process, servlet, script, or
something
else that creates these?
Are the pages static or is there some process, servlet, script, or something
else that creates these? There could also be another system somewhere that
is allowed access to the areas that hold the HTML files and is creating them
in some nightly process.
I don't know that this is a Java que
Does anyone know of a mailing list were I can ask some java related
questions?
The number one question I have is if it's possible to write code within
Java that changes all your HTML files back to their original default?
A client of mine runs, dare I say it here JBoss 2.4 and I found two
copies
42 matches
Mail list logo
