The third one. ☹
Oh well, I had to ask.
-Eric
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 2:50 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: State Synchronization without Serialization - Possible?
On 22/04/2025 01:09, Eric Robinson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> W
, etc., between tomcat instances,
without using tomcat's native clustering facilities, and without having access
to the application code? I know it's probably a dumb question, but I must ask.
-Eric
Disclaimer : This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
inte
ll)
On 11/10/2024 01:05, Eric Robinson wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Thanks very much for the update. We'll check back in November!
I've just committed the fix. It should be in the next set of releases
(November).
Mark
>
> -Eric
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
Mark,
Thanks very much for the update. We'll check back in November!
-Eric
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2024 5:30 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Database Connection Requests Initiated but Not Sent on the Wire
(Some, Not All)
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Eric Robinson
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2024 11:11 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Database Connection Requests Initiated but Not Sent on the Wire
(Some, Not All)
Hi Mark,
Just following up on this. Did you arrive at the long-term solution? This issue
Hi Mark,
Just following up on this. Did you arrive at the long-term solution? This issue
is still biting us.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Robinson
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2024 4:15 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Database Connection Requests Initiated but Not Sent on the Wire
an be expected to answer.
-Eric
Disclaimer : This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for intended recipients. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions presented in thi
on the server. And would maxThreads have to be
increased to accommodate the extra connections?
-Eric
Disclaimer : This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for intended recipients. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute, c
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Caldarale
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 11:01 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Isolating the Root Cause of "Connection Refused"
>
>
> > On Jun 25, 2024, at 12:55, Eric Robinson
> wrote:
> >
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Caldarale
> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2024 2:51 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Isolating the Root Cause of "Connection Refused"
>
>
> > On Jun 24, 2024, at 16:40, Eric Robinson
> wrote:
> >
>
ist
> Subject: Re: Isolating the Root Cause of "Connection Refused"
>
>
> > On Jun 24, 2024, at 15:47, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Chuck Caldarale
> >> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2024 1:40 PM
> >> T
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Caldarale
> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2024 1:40 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Isolating the Root Cause of "Connection Refused"
>
>
> > On Jun 24, 2024, at 15:36, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Caldarale
> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2024 1:29 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Isolating the Root Cause of "Connection Refused"
>
>
> > On Jun 24, 2024, at 15:19, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >
> >
ws 90-150K connections
Obviously, the TCP stack must be running into some resource limitation, or some
kind of race condition. I've been working the issue for hours and days, without
success. How can I determine exactly why the tomcats intermittently reject
connections?
-Eric
Disclaimer :
Chris,
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2024 12:50 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Database Connection Requests Initiated but Not Sent on the Wire
> (Some, Not All)
>
> Eric,
>
> On 5/31
wrote:
> > On 31/05/2024 16:09, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >> The results are looking great so far.
> >
> > Excellent.
> >
> >> Here's what we know:
> >>
> >> Before the patch, we had 2 load-balanced tomcats in production for
> >>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2024 11:45 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Database Connection Requests Initiated but Not Sent on the Wire
> (Some, Not All)
>
> On 31/05/2024 16:09, Eric Robinson wrote:
> > Th
today,
there have been 1 stuck thread on Tomcat A and 6 on Tomcat B.
If the numbers hold, this works out to roughly a 10,000% improvement.
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Robinson
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2024 5:54 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Database
d.
>
> Let us know how you get on and good luck.
>
The changes have been applied. We'll know at around 9:30 am EST if they have
had the desired effect. Fingers crossed!
> Mark
>
>
> On 30/05/2024 10:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 29/05/2024 17:03, Eric Robinson wrot
slava
> next week.
>
> I am expecting that any fix won't be in the June release round but should be
> in
> the July release round.
>
> Let us know how you get on and good luck.
>
Will do!
> Mark
>
>
> On 30/05/2024 10:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 29
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 10:19 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Database Connection Requests Initiated but Not Sent on the Wire
> (Some, Not All)
>
> On 29/05/2024 16:08, Eric Robinson wrote:
>
&g
Hi Mark,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 10:10 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Database Connection Requests Initiated but Not Sent on the Wire
> (Some, Not All)
>
> On 29/05/2024 13:38, Eric Robinson w
Mark,
A few other thoughts come to mind. See below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Robinson
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 7:39 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Database Connection Requests Initiated but Not Sent on the Wire
> (Some, No
> > On 28/05/2024 16:26, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> Took a bunch of thread and heap dumps during today's painful debacle.
> >> Will send a link to those as soon as I can.
> >
> > Thanks. I have them. I have taken a look and
Hi Mark,
See comments below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2024 9:32 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Database Connection Requests Initiated but Not Sent on the Wire
> (Some, Not All)
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Follow-up
Hi Mark,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2024 3:42 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Database Connection Requests Initiated but Not Sent on the Wire
> (Some, Not All)
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> I have a some follow-up
Hi Chuck,
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Caldarale
> Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2024 2:21 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Database Connection Requests Initiated but Not Sent on the Wire
> (Some, Not All)
>
>
> > On May 25, 2024, at 20:58, Eric R
t; > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Chuck Caldarale
> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. Mai 2024 21:21
> > An: Tomcat Users List
> > Betreff: Re: Database Connection Requests Initiated but Not Sent on
> > the Wire (Some, Not All)
> >
> >
> >
Hi Thomas,
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH)
>
> Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2024 2:52 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: AW: Database Connection Requests Initiated but Not Sent on the Wire
> (Some, Not All)
>
> Hello Eric,
>
&g
18.0-513.18.1.el8_9.x86_64
Apache Tomcat/9.0.80, JVM 1.8.0_372-b07
(The tomcat and JVM versions are the ones recommended by the vendor.)
We're standing by to provide whatever other information the community may need.
Thanks tons!
-Eric
Disclaimer : This email and any files transmitted with
Thanks Christopher!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 4, 2024, at 10:20 PM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
> Eric,
>
>> On 4/4/24 13:43, Eric Fetzer wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> When I originally set up my tomcat instance, I added the following to allow
>> m
l character.
> So "\d" would mean the literal letter "d".
>
> There's more rules, but they're well documented all over the internet, so I
> won't elaborate.
>
> Robert Egan
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 2:01 PM Eric Fetzer wrote:
>
> >
e firewall is
carved properly. Thanks!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 11:58 AM Eric Fetzer wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response Robert! So I tried escaping the periods and
> putting the \d+ for the * but it didn't work. Is the \d+ incorrect in
> substitution for *?
>
> On Thu, Apr
\.
> etc...
> 1\.3\.5
> Robert Egan
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 1:44 PM Eric Fetzer wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > When I originally set up my tomcat instance, I added the following to
> allow
> > manager access under /opt/tomcat/webapps/manager/META-INF
d+ as well but that didn't
work either. I've verified I can get to port 8080 from the IP locations.
Any idea what I'm doing wrong or do you have a means to troubleshoot this?
Thanks,
Eric
sending a new message to the list.
>
> You also need to provide some version information.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On 06/07/2023 00:36, Eric Robinson wrote:
> > We've been seeing problems with failed requests where the response comes
> back with duplicate chunked encoding
Wed, 05 Jul 2023 17:22:11 GMT
This is a violation of RFC 7230, so our nginx proxy is dropping the request and
returning a 502 bad gateway error. I've spoken to F5 about this, and there's no
way to make nginx ignore this violation. Unfortunately, the app is a canned
product, and we don&#x
to me soon hopefully.
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Monday, January 3, 2022 9:10 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This
> Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?
>
> Eric,
>
> On 12/30/21 19:0
Hi Rob,
> > On Dec 30, 2021, at 4:03 PM, Eric Robinson
> wrote:
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > If I want to ignore the vendor's recommendation and try connection
> pooling anyway, is that something I can enable with a config file setting, or
> do
> the
Chris,
If I want to ignore the vendor's recommendation and try connection pooling
anyway, is that something I can enable with a config file setting, or do they
actually have to trigger it from within their code?
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Robinson
> Sent: Thursda
tion, does the Linux ip_local_port_range shown here...
>
> $ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range
> 32768 61000
>
> ...apply globally, or on a per-socket basis? I would think that it should
> apply
> per socket, but in practice it seems to be a global limitation.
>
p_local_port_range
32768 61000
...apply globally, or on a per-socket basis? I would think that it should apply
per socket, but in practice it seems to be a global limitation.
-Eric
Disclaimer : This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for intende
what their issue is. We've asked about implementing it before, but
they don't support it. You know how software companies are. Maybe they had a
technical problem with it years ago and have just not revisited it. They're
stuck in a rut and there is too much inertia to get them out
ailable client
ports. We alleviated that by increasing the client port range, but the problem
will return when we quintuple the tomcat instance count.
--Eric
Disclaimer : This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for intended recipients. If you are not th
I can do with network namespaces
that would be even better. I don't have any experience with using it.
-Eric
Disclaimer : This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for intended recipients. If you are not the named addressee you
should not dissem
tion gets its own tomcat
instance.
-Eric
Disclaimer : This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for intended recipients. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions presen
tances on the
app server. When we increase the count to 500, the problem will reappear unless
we can figure out a way to distribute client port usage. That's why I came up
with the idea of using multiple source IPs on the app server. I am new to
network namespaces, and thought that migh
he proxy relays the queries to the
> db backend.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
Your guess is correct.
-Eric
Disclaimer : This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for intended recipients. If you are not the named addressee you
should not dissemin
> Your problem seems to be in the client-to-db server side of things. Not
> tomcat as a server.
>
In the context of this question, tomcat is the client.
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 2:11 PM Eric Robinson
> wrote:
>
> > We want to run a large number of tomcat inst
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Eggers
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 6:18 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Do I Need Network NameSpaces to Solve This
> Tomcat+Connector/J Problem?
>
> Eric:
>
> On 12/29/2021 1:04 PM, Eric Robinson wro
We want to run a large number of tomcat instances on the same server without
virtualization or containerization. Each instance is executed from its own
folder tree and listens on its own unique TCP port. Each instance will run code
that connects to a backend database server to send queries that
> -Original Message-
> From: Berneburg, Cris J. - US
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 7:16 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: RE: 500 instances of tomcat on the same server
>
> Eric and Mark
>
> Just curious...
>
> Eric> We can run 75 to 125 i
Kubernetes tutorials I saw on
YouTube seem to approach it as a dev platform, and we're not developers.
-Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Guido Jäkel
> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2021 2:43 PM
> To: Brian Wolfe
> Cc: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: 500 instances of to
t be simple to be able to scale it to different clients like that.
> just my 2 cents.
>
Not simple, but predictable. We've been hosting it for over decade, and we have
a good feel for its resource utilization.
-Eric
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 1:12 PM Eric Robinson
> wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2021 9:04 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 500 instances of tomcat on the same server
>
> On 28/06/2021 14:53, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> > Eric,
> >
> > On 6/25
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2021 8:54 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 500 instances of tomcat on the same server
>
> Eric,
>
> On 6/25/21 22:58, Eric Robinson wrote:
> > We can run 75 to 12
> -Original Message-
> From: Shawn Heisey
> Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2021 8:09 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 500 instances of tomcat on the same server
>
> On 6/25/2021 8:58 PM, Eric Robinson wrote:
> > We can run 75 to 125 instances of tomc
a 48-core server with 1TB RAM, and we're
planning to run 600+ tomcat instances on it simultaneously. What caveats or
pitfalls should we watch out for? Are there any hard limits that would prevent
this from working as expected?
-Eric
Disclaimer : This email and any files transmit
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark H. Wood
> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2021 12:30 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Re-Use TCP Source Ports if the Socket is Unique?
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 12:46:03PM +, Eric Robinson wrote:
> > Olaf and Scott -
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2021 11:33 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Re-Use TCP Source Ports if the Socket is Unique?
>
> Eric,
>
> On 6/24/21 21:14, Eric Robinson wrote:
> > I guess I ma
> -Original Message-
> From: Olaf Kock
> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2021 8:07 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Re-Use TCP Source Ports if the Socket is Unique?
>
>
> On 25.06.21 14:46, Eric Robinson wrote:
> > Olaf and Scott --
> >
> &g
me IP that
the connector is configured to listen on.
> -Original Message-
> From: Olaf Kock
> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2021 3:01 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Re-Use TCP Source Ports if the Socket is Unique?
>
>
> On 25.06.21 05:19, Eric Robinson
ce Ports if the Socket is Unique?
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> It should behave the same way. The socket client application will be assigned
> an ephemeral port.
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:14 AM Eric Robinson
> wrote:
>
> > I guess I may have answered this question for myself.
connector that
tomcat uses.
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Robinson
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 3:19 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re-Use TCP Source Ports if the Socket is Unique?
>
> Two quick questions.
>
> Question 1:
>
> When tomcat cre
to the remote database server using the same source port 3456, given that the
sockets is unique (different source IP)?
-Eric
Disclaimer : This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for intended recipients. If you are not the named addressee you
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 3:13 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Wait... NULL address in java.net.BindException: Address already
> in use (Bind failed) ???
>
> Eric and Martin,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 2:35 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Wait... NULL address in java.net.BindException: Address already
> in use (Bind failed) ???
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, 20:27 Eric Robinso
> From: Martin Grigorov
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 12:45 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Wait... NULL address in java.net.BindException: Address already
> in use (Bind failed) ???
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, 19:34 Eric Robinson
&
s no other process listening on
that port. Could the problem be that the host address is null for some reason?
I don't recall seeing that before, and Google diving came up dry.
-Eric
Disclaimer : This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for intended
Hi,
I'm running Tomcat 8.5.50.0 on JRE 1.8.0_241-b07 on Solaris 5.11. Like many
other people, I've failed to disable TLSv1, TLSv1.1 etc.
Here is a snippet of server.xml:
sslEnabledProtocols="TLSv1.2,TLSv1.3"
In fact, configuring any of
VM process, right? And the parent
> >> process (this native library, running within the JVM process)
> >> double-closes file descriptors, with some measurable delay?
> >
> > Correct. In the instance where I did most of the log analysis the
> > delay was about 0.1 s
> native library that ships as part of the commercial web application where the
> original issue is observed.
>
> >> TL;DR, an issue in an external library, not a Tomcat issue.
>
>
>
> > So does this really look like a (pretty serious) bug in a native
> > library? An
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 8:11 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> Mark,
>
> On 11/20/20 11:08, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 20/11/2020 15:43, Eric Robins
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 9:32 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> On 20/11/2020 14:55, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >> From: Mark Thomas
> >> It looks like y
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 3:17 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> On 19/11/2020 16:03, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 19/11/2020 15:55, Eric Robinson wrote:
>
>
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 4:34 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> On 18/11/2020 16:28, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 18/11/2020 15:41, Eric Robinson wrote:
>
>
>
> >>I tested
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 3:03 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> On 13/11/2020 23:46, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > Eric sent me a copy of the strace (thanks Eric) and
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 5:47 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> Eric sent me a copy of the strace (thanks Eric) and while it is consistent
> with
> what ha
> From: Thomas Meyer
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 9:37 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List ; Mark Thomas
> ; users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
>
>
> Am 13. November 2020 10:06:18 MEZ schrieb Mark Thomas
> :
> >On 12/11/2020 14
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Carter-Brown
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 6:11 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> These weird situations are sometimes best looked at by confirming what the
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 3:06 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> On 12/11/2020 14:19, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >> From: Mark Thomas
>
>
>
> >>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 4:08 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List ; Eric Robinson
>
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> On 11/11/2020 22:48, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Monday, November 9, 2020 5:59 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> Eric,
>
> Time to prune the history and provide another summary I think. This
> summary
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stefan Mayr
> > Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 4:24 PM
> > To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
> >
> > Am 03.11.2020 um 16:05 schrieb Eric Robinson:
> > >>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Mayr
> Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 4:24 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> Am 03.11.2020 um 16:05 schrieb Eric Robinson:
> >> -Original Message-
> >>
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 11:39 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> On 03/11/2020 15:05, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >> From: Eric Robinson
> >>> From: Mark Thomas
>
>
>
&
> From: Christopher Schultz
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 9:26 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> Eric,
>
> On 11/3/20 10:05, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Eric Robins
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Robinson
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 8:21 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> > From: Mark Thomas
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 2:06 AM
> > To: Tomcat Users Li
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 2:06 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> On 02/11/2020 12:16, Eric Robinson wrote:
>
>
>
> > Gotcha, thanks for the clarification. Let's see what happens when t
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 5:38 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> On 02/11/2020 11:18, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Mark Thomas
> >> Se
]
org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalOutputBuffer.recycle Recycling
InternalOutputBuffer [1806171306]
02-Nov-2020 06:17:22.012 FINE [http-bio-3016-exec-9]
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$DebugSocket.close close [1432592805],
inner Socket [1204212376]
java.lang.Exception
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIo
t could get closed.
>
> I think more debug logging is required. I am currently working on that.
>
I'll apply the new patch and restart the tomcat this evening. Just to be safe,
I'm only applying it to one of the tomcat instances.
--Eric
> Mark
>
> -
> From: Eric Robinson
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 11:33 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> > From: Mark Thomas
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 12:06 PM
> > To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: We
> From: Mark Thomas
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 12:06 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> On 27/10/2020 16:29, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >> On 27/10/2020 15:22, Eric Robinson wrote:
>
>
>
> >>> I
> On 27/10/2020 15:22, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >> On 27/10/2020 09:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >>> On 27/10/2020 04:43, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> Any changes in the Nginx configuration in t
> On 27/10/2020 09:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 27/10/2020 04:43, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>>>>> Any changes in the Nginx configuration in the relevant timescale?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Robinson
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 11:37 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> > > On 26/10/2020 10:26, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > > > O
> > On 26/10/2020 10:26, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > > On 24/10/2020 01:32, Eric Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>>> -Original Message-
> > >>>> From: Mark Thomas
> > >
> > >
> > >
> On 26/10/2020 10:26, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 24/10/2020 01:32, Eric Robinson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>>> -Original Message-
> >>>> From: Mark Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >>>> The failed request:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Robinson
> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 7:09 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Weirdest Tomcat Behavior Ever?
>
> Hi Mark --
>
> Thanks tons for digging into this. See my answers below.
>
> > -Origina
1 - 100 of 592 matches
Mail list logo
