On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:16 PM, David Rees wrote:
> I'll open a ticket with these details, too.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56578
-Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:39 PM, David Rees wrote:
>
> Yes. Specifics to make this happen seem to be:
>
> TC 7.0.54 in a cluster, Tapestry 5.2.6 + Tapestry Spring Security.
OK, I was wrong, no Tapestry or Spring Security is required, just a
couple JSPs are required to reproduce.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> Do you mean that you have a web application that does this:
>
> session.invalidate();
> session = request.getSession(true);
>
> ... and the old session is in fact not invalidated?
Yes. Specifics to make this happen seem to be:
TC
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2014-05-29 11:58 GMT+04:00 David Rees :
>> I've found that certain applications will no longer invalidate
>> sessions after upgrading from 7.0.53 to 7.0.54.
>>
>> It seems to require clustering to be s
I've found that certain applications will no longer invalidate
sessions after upgrading from 7.0.53 to 7.0.54.
It seems to require clustering to be set up in Tomcat. If it's not set
up, session invalidation works fine.
So far, I can only trigger it in a webapp that uses Tapestry Spring Security.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> Remove the tomcat7-websocket.jar library if you do not need it. This
> library (added in 7.0.47, a JSR-356 Java WebSocket 1.0 implementation)
> has a ServletContainerInitializer and thus forces Tomcat to perform
> annotation scanning.
Since upgrading to 7.0.47 from 7.0.42, I've seen a very severe
performance hit during startup.
One Tomcat instance with a lot of webapps slowed down from ~33 seconds
to ~180 seconds. It appears to be related to jar-scanning - If I
change catalina.properties'
tomcat.util.scan.DefaultJarScanner.jars
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> For those who don't want to wait for 7.0.42 and would prefer not to
> run in "headless" more for some reason can set this attribute in the
> JreMemoryLeakProtectionListener:
>
>appContextProtection="false"
I have confirmed that eit
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> I just upgraded to 1.7.0_25 on my Mac and I noticed that when I launch
> Tomcat, I get a dock icon indicating that it is running. This does not
> happen on 1.7.0_21, the previous version I was running.
>
> For some reason, 1.7.0_25 trig
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2012/2/14 Mark Thomas :
>> On 14/02/2012 03:11, David Rees wrote:
>>> This may not be Tomcat related, but I couldn't find anything in the
>>> JSP/JSTL/EL specifications regarding a change in behavior from
This may not be Tomcat related, but I couldn't find anything in the
JSP/JSTL/EL specifications regarding a change in behavior from JSP
2.0-2.2.
Here's a simple JSP 2-line which shows the issue:
<%@taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core"; prefix="c"%>
Using Tomcat 5.5.35 the page will pri
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com]
>> > that's why the setting of /dev/./urandom is important, even
>> > though it would seem to be equivalent.
>
>> So editing the file fixes this, or just using the system property?
>
> Good question
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Pid wrote:
> On 27/01/2012 20:23, David Rees wrote:
>> Google turns up lots of hits which suggest using
>> -Djava.security.egd=file:/dev/./urandom to work around the issue - but
>> I'd rather not give up security for start up speed.
>
I've been working on upgrading some Tomcat 5.5 servers to Tomcat 7
since 5.5 will be EOL soon.
One thing I noticed on one of my first upgrades is that TC7 can often
take a long time to start up due to slow initialization of the
SessionIdGenerator - it can take up to nearly 2 minutes! It appears
t
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 24/01/2012 21:01, David Rees wrote:
>> The system has 8 CPU cores, Opteron 2378 CPU. Going beyond 4
>> startStopThreads for the host where the webapps are deployed doesn't
>> speed things up much more as it appears that
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Pid * wrote:
> On 23 Jan 2012, at 21:12, David Rees wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> I have added a patch based on the previous patches that adds:
>>> - threaded start/stop for Contexts
>>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I have added a patch based on the previous patches that adds:
> - threaded start/stop for Contexts
> - threaded start/stop for Hosts
> - threaded deployment
>
> Control over the number of threads is via server.xml and/or JMX. This
> can be chan
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 27/07/2011 17:23, Robert Elliot wrote:
>> We are using Tomcat 6.0.29, and occasionally experiencing concurrency issues
>> which look very much like the wrong response is being returned for a request.
>> While we cannot reproduce it reliably
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> A test tarball was just announced to the development list
> for voting and approval...
Thanks - I guess I was not patient enough. :-)
-Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users
I saw that there is a security bug[1] announced last Friday that
affects all versions of Tomcat including the latest released version
of Tomcat 5.5.32, but that 5.5.33 is expected today the 7th.
However, not seeing any activity on the list regarding 5.5.33 is it
really going to happen today or wil
Hi,
I've got an application where I need to keep track of all the active
user sessions. Using both the HttpSessionActivationListener +
HttpSessionListener interfaces seemed like an easy way to be able to
keep track of all sessions.
The issue I've come across is that HttpSessionActivationListener
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Andre-John Mas wrote:
> I saw the Tomcat can use Gzip compression, though I am curious to know
> whether there is any built in caching mechanism to cache static content that
> has been Gzipped, to reduce the server load?
No, you'd have to use Apache/mod_proxy in fr
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Wesley Acheson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> Maybe the following will help you:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Windows
>
> Tomcat 6.0.18
> windows vista professional 32 bit.
>
> Although I seem to have seen a related
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Wesley Acheson wrote:
> How do I either reliably deploy/undeploy from root?
Name the war file ROOT.war.
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/manager-howto.html
-Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
I'm trying to implement a session listener so that I can check the
status of a session. Essentially, I need to maintain a Map of all the
sessions. I would add sessions to this map based on business logic.
The problem I have is that the behavior of the listeners is different
when clustering
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Adam Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As previously mentioned, we
> cannot simply put this on the URL as a parameter because we are using sticky
> sessions.
Why not? It works just fine in my tests.
-Dave
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Adam Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See my reply to Hassan. I think setting up a proxy would be overkill, and
> besides, when running Tomcat in a load-balanced capacity w/ sticky sessions
> using mod JK, while you can connect directly to the port on which Tomc
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Adam Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since we're connecting to Tomcat via an Apache load-balancer, we don't know
> of a way to force the load-balancer to go to a certain Tomcat instance.
> Additionally, we don't know how to speak mod j/k so we can't fake a dire
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Christopher Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Davidson wrote:
>> The way I deal with it is to use Firefox for one and IE for the other.
>
> You could use separate tabs in the same browser if you were to disable
> cookies on your browser (and you have correct
I posted a couple messages to the user/dev lists last week asking the
same question, but still haven't seen any mention of a plan to release
a new 5.5.x or 4.1.x to fix the security issues posted at the
beginning of the month.
Is there a plan to push a new release for either 5.5.x or 4.1.x or
shou
With the 3 known security vulnerabilities in 5.5.26, when will 5.5.27
be scheduled for release?
http://tomcat.apache.org/security-5.html
I am particularly worried about CVE-2008-2370 myself.
I would rather not have to go through and completely test 6.0.18 which
has been released and has the 3 kn
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Rees wrote:
> > I've got a cluster in my test lab with the following configuration on
> 5.5.26:
> >
> >
> >
> > Looking at /manager/jmxproxy?qry=*:*
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Rees wrote:
> > One problem I've intermittently had with clustering is that after a
> > Tomcat restart (we shut down one node and it immediately restarts,
> > generally wi
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ronald Klop schrieb:
> > See my previous mail about send/receive buffers filling because Ack
> > wasn't read by FastAsyncSender.
> > The option waitForAck="true" did the trick for me. But for
> > FastAsyncSender you shoul
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First to make sure: counting objects in general only makes sense after a
> full GC. Otherwise the heap dump will contain garbage too.
Yes, I made sure the objects I was looking at had a valid GC
reference. They really wer
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> See my previous mail about send/receive buffers filling because Ack wasn't
> read by FastAsyncSender.
> The option waitForAck="true" did the trick for me. But for FastAsyncSender
> you should set sendAck="false" on the rec
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:14 AM, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From my understanding of the clustering software, it appears that
> Tomcat is trying to send messages to the other Tomcat but it isn't
> receiving them? Shouldn't it drop membership and give u
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:49 AM, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a 2-Tomcat 5.5.26 cluster running 64bit Java which leaks
> ClusterData and LinkObject objects.
>
> I have a hprof dump which shows over 600k of each of those classes.
> Analyzing them with
I have a 2-Tomcat 5.5.26 cluster running 64bit Java which leaks
ClusterData and LinkObject objects.
I have a hprof dump which shows over 600k of each of those classes.
Analyzing them with a profiler reveals an endless loop of
LinkObject.next references through all 600k of them. There were about
60
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:26 PM, David Smithson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess the list doesn't support attachments, so I've staged this on a
> web server. Here's the link to the graph:
> https://littleblue.activsupport.com/tomcat_graph.png
404 Forbidden.
-Dave
--
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:26 AM, James Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you think that little hollow voice can clarify how IPSec would solve this
> problem by giving an example of a software that I could implement to
> accomplish this?
Google IPSec and VPN and you will find your answer.
-Dav
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PCI-DSS calls for encryption on all channels where payment information will
> be transmitted is the configuration described here non PCI-DSS compliant?
No, PCI-DSS calls for encryption of card data across open, public
net
On Feb 13, 2008 12:08 AM, Andrew Hole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2008 7:23 AM, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have you tried starting with a minimal configuration and then adding
> > options as you deem necessary?
>
> What you consider th
On Feb 12, 2008 10:59 AM, Andrew Hole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've the following configuration on server.xml for two different instances
> of tomcat (on the same server). BUT, i don't know why, session replication
> doesn't work.
> Could you help me to find why?
Have you tried starting with a
On Jan 18, 2008 1:13 PM, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So your testing is with the to-be-released 5.5.26? Where can I get a
> copy of this and the changes going into 5.5.26?
I found the changelog, looks like I need to build 5.5.26 from source
myself if i want to te
On Jan 18, 2008 8:17 AM, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have also made a test with two cluster nodes. Is node2 under load
> as node1 is started the message are normal.
> Cluster is starts first and receive message, but the application
> starts later. As application is startet at node
On Jan 17, 2008 12:16 AM, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you can't restart your nodes so quickly. As you shutdown one node you
> must wait 30-45 sec before next restart. Don't restart both nodes at same
> time.
I am waiting at 4 minutes before restarting node 2 before restarting
node
I'm running a Tomcat 5.5.25 cluster with 2 nodes and the following
cluster configuration in the element:
Every night, I restart the two nodes of the cluster, one at a time,
using a standard shutdown with a processing monitoring Tomcat to start
it back up aut
On 8/23/07, Lyallex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although ... depending on what you consider hacking it certainly seems
> like it could easily be used to run a crude DOS attack (for example)
> simply by writing a shell script with a loop in it, like many other
> otherwise benign applications out th
> > He's already using a low prepost_timeout of 50ms (IMO is way too low
> > and should be set to 250-500ms).
>
> Sorry, I had only little time and directly ran into our old problem,
> that some timeouts are seconds, and some are milliseconds. Your are
> right, 50 is way too small, se my new Timeou
On 8/23/07, Lyallex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/23/07, Lyallex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, looking for favicon.ico and doing a HEAD on my entry page, doesn't
> > look to suspicious I guess.
>
> ...tracking the perpetrator down now ... this is fun.
While the exercise may be fun, you ar
On 8/23/07, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guofeng Zhang schrieb:
> > # Define Master
> > worker.master.host=192.168.225.195
> > worker.master.port=8009
> > worker.master.type=ajp13
> > worker.master.lbfactor=1
> > worker.master.cachesize=10
> > worker.master.cache_timeout=600
> > worker.
On 12/18/06, cifroes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cifroes wrote:
> David Rees wrote:
>>
>> Are you sticky sessions? If not, that will usually fix the issue you
>> see.
>>
> Sorry, I don't know what sticky sessions are... But please note I'm
> not
On 12/18/06, cifroes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm configuring a Tomcat cluster with 2 servers. In front of that I have
a loadbalancer (LVS software) doing round-robin between the 2 servers.
In my tests I'm finding that the session replication mechanism isn't
"fast enough" to replicate the data
On 11/21/06, Andre Prasetya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/21/06, Harry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PostgreSQL is excellent, IMHO - fast, and easy to administrate.
Yupe agreed, but for database that is used with frequent insert and delete
statement, I have to vacuum them frequently. Which is a
On 11/13/06, Dave Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After an absurd amount of searching about, I have not been able to find a
single reference on how to ensure that the cookies set by Tomcat expire 3
months after they're created (they currently expire sometime in 2019).
What cookies are you ta
On 9/6/06, Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are running a 4-node cluster of 5.5.17. Sometimes java or tomcat
crashes and we restart it automaticly. With 5.0.x this was ok, but
with 5.5.x it doesn't sync session on startup often.
Ronald, I am seeing nearly the exact same issue/errors wi
On 9/25/06, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So are you suggesting that the something weird is on
the Jboss configuration side?
No, I'm suggestions that something is wrong with your firewall. Are
you sure Apache is getting through via mod_jk?
-Dave
--
On 9/25/06, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm using mod_jk. I currently have it working in a dev
environment. Apache Web server ---> jboss application
server.
I need to move to Production:
Apache --> [FireWall] --> jboss
When I first tried this everything failed. We opened
port 8009 on the
On 9/11/06, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/11/06, Asensio, Rodrigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CentOS & Debian with tomcat, how many users are you handling ?
> Here with 350 logged users our Win2003-Serv is suffering a lot all the
> time.
> I really want to know the capacity of
On 8/16/06, Propes, Barry L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Maurice Yarrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generally, getRemoteHost() and getRemoteAddr() return
the same value, but I had found a situation during testing
where getRemoteAddr() returned an IP address but
getRemoteHost() returned nothing
On 8/11/06, Propes, Barry L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what about getRemoteHost()?
getRemoteHost is simply a getRemoteAddr with a reverse DNS lookup
thrown on top. No additional security there, in fact one could argue
that there is less.
-Dave
-
I wonder if associating (and checking) the request IP with the
session would reduce the problem to some acceptable level. What is
the chance of a session being hijacked from the same network
(face-ip)?
Another question is can the original request IP be spoofed?
In this case the chances are rela
On 7/27/06, Guilherme Silveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If running CpuTest once gives you 25% its a OS/java problem.
If it gives you 100%... its tomcat's fault...
This particular problem is not likely to be Tomcat's fault, it's most
likely a synchronization/perfromance bug in the applicat
On 7/5/06, Speulman, Elly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there anyone out there who has been able to configure more than 1550M for
Tomcat 5.0 on a Windows advanced server installation. The server has a total
of 4Gb of memory. We are just not able to cross a border.
Config of Tomcat memory takes pl
On 6/23/06, Edward Diener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How can I programatically find out which version(s) of Tomcat is
installed on my system ?
getServletContext().getServerInfo()
-Dave
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@to
On 6/22/06, Per Johnsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is 1.2.16 avaiable for download somewhere?
Not that I know of, you have to grab the source from SVN.
Found this:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/news/20060505.html
I wonder how that got there!
-Dave
--
On 6/13/06, FM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a way to set a timeout for mod_jk ? Something tomcat crashes
and httpd stops responding because every connection tries to connect to
tomcat (with mod_jk) but there is no time out.
I try this setting in worker.properties :
worker.tomcat5.type=ajp
On 6/14/06, Kim Albee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need some help -- I'm downloading the JK binaries to get my tomcat
installation working with Apache, and when I go to download the jk binaries
for linux/apache, I see the two files:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.14-linux-sles9-x86_64-prefork.
On 6/10/06, hv @ Fashion Content <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had an incident on my server the other day where someone had succesfully
broken into the server to execute a port scanner.
The port scanner was running under the tomcat process so I assume the
breakin was done by getting through the T
On 6/4/06, Sandeep Gaikwad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which version is most suitable for Tomcat Clustering?
The latest version, 5.5.17.
-Dave
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
On 5/11/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/11/06, Peter Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how
> to allow individual browser windows and tabs to have individual session
> data. Is there a real solution for this, and if so could some kind soul
> please point me in the right di
On 5/5/06, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
you could send the user to a waiting page, which should automatically
retry the action (via http redirect or js redirect) after some amount
of time.
On the other hand, if the waiting condition is almost permanent your
should think about other s
On 5/4/06, Ken Dombeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks.
The problem with this solution is that the end user will then see the
SC_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE error. The desired behavior is for the users
request to wait until a thread is freed up to process their request.
Is there way to do that?
Not
On 5/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On my RHEL server, running tomcat 5.5.12, jvm 1.5.0_06-b05
when I litterally reboot the server, tomcat restarts, which I then access
via the tomcat manager; and everything is "Running = true" except for my
application. I can click "Start" a
On 4/4/06, Walter Botman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we configure tomcat in a way that it uses more then one CPU?
> It seems to use only one CPU ?
>
> We are using the following:
> - Sun Fire v240 (with 2 CPU's)
> - Solaris 8 (including patches)
> - tomcat 5.5.7
> - Java 1.5.0
There isn't any
On 4/3/06, Meryl Silverburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to limit Tomcat to just handle 10 concurrently request
> to my servlet?
> for all others (11 and onward), it will queue them up, and serve them
> only when one of the currently-serving request is done?
If you are only using o
On 4/3/06, Eric Wulff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Doesn't seem too serious but I've found little doc on it. I
> downloaded the tomcat-native.zip but there is no readme, install,
> config file and I haven't been able to find documentation about
> install config for this. 2 questions...
>
> How
On 3/22/06, Chris Fong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have gotten request to separate traffic to multiple ports so that
> Network Engineer can manage/debug network traffic easier (by port). I
> totally agree this will make troubleshooting easier, but I am also
> afraid there is performance cost in
On 3/21/06, Chris Fong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me rephrase original my question.
>
> Is it an abnormal configuration to have roughly 20 connectors all
> listening on different ports for 5.5.15? Have anyone had similar
> configuration for their production environment with heavy traffic?
Y
On 3/17/06, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Have you tried it? ;)
>
> Yeah, and it didn't add any performance. However it helped to keep the
> thread count low. But it was on 2.4.x kernel, where threads were an
> issue, on 2.6.x its pointless (at least until you really has somethi
On 3/17/06, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Yes it will work (technically it is feasible), with several caveats, namely,
> >multicast is typically not enabled on WANs
>
> yeah, I would say feasible, but unless you can talk to every ISP in the chain
> between
> point A and poi
On 3/17/06, Alex Jalali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although i do have this question about non-static pages. Which do you
> think is faster? let say you have 1GB ram and 2 CPUs. running a) apache +
> 1 tomcat or b) apache + 2 tomcat in cluster via mod_jk? would having 2 JVM
> on the same server th
On 3/17/06, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But pushing dynamic content with squid? I doubt it will work. However,
> squid is using select reads instead of tomcat's blocking reads, and
> could reduce the number of threads, but I have seriously doubts with
> keepalives, have you actually
On 3/17/06, Rajeev Jha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then, the other bottle-neck is, integrating with apache. If we run
> tomcat APJ APR and apache is the front end then apache would also be
> hard pressed to do 1024 keep-alive connections. I can try event MPM or
> worker modules. Does this look ok
On 3/15/06, Dhaval Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Do you know of any hardware/software configuration to increase high
> availability?
One way is to load-balance Tomcat instances behind Apache using mod_jk
and sticky-sessions. You can also use a hardware load balancer as
well. There are a n
On 3/15/06, David Kerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any adjustments I can do to my Axis settings to reduce the
> bandwidth usage on my SOAP requests?
XML compresses very well, typically I have seen compression ratios over 10x!
The key is to get your clients and servers configured to
On 10/27/05, Maurice Yarrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (For Internet Explorer:)
> Do you happen to know which are the "right headers" to set,
> especially for images ?? If not, maybe you could point me
> to a good source of info for caching rules for IE.
Use these links for further reading:
ht
On 10/27/05, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You simply can't rely on browser caching behaving. Especially https
> caching. Firefox / Galleon cache everything they can get, this is
> really ugly, especially if the cache dynamical content with all
> headers set (I've seen versions of m
89 matches
Mail list logo
