Good Day!
In the documentation, it says that with autobind, if port is unavailable it
will try to work its way up to the port+autobind.
But Members' port and Receiver's port should be the same. Is this correct?
I would like to ask how does port behaves on Receiver with autobind and the
Members
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 8/24/16 3:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/08/2016 17:56, Toews, Timothy wrote:
>> Hello all:
>>
>> I am new to this list as of half an hour ago. I am concurrently
>> searching the archives for a potential solution to the error
>> message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
James,
On 8/24/16 3:46 PM, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> On 8/24/16, 12:36 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> At a guess, something in the web application is using the
>> platform default encoding rather than an explicit encoding. Given
>> that the Linux b
Apache Tomcat/7.0.54
CentOS release 6.7
AWS RDS Aurora 5.6.10a
Using RDS in a failover configuration, AWS directs requests to the
write instance with a cluster CNAME e.g.
dbname-cluster.cluster-id.us-west-2.rds.amazonaws.com, and the
read-only instance to it's canonical name e.g.
dbname-us-west-2c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 8/24/16 3:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/08/2016 20:24, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
>> On 8/24/16, 11:48 AM, Jason D. Burkert wrote:
>>
>>> Try running \bin\version.bat on the Tomcat in question and
>>> examining 'Architecture' field.
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John,
On 8/24/16 2:40 PM, John Beaulaurier -X (jbeaulau - ADVANCED NETWORK
INFORMATION INC at Cisco) wrote:
> Thanks for the response Chris.
>
>> Second now that the new attribute entry was supposedly picked up,
>> how do I confirm it is now 300 se
On 8/24/16, 12:36 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
At a guess, something in the web application is using the platform
default encoding rather than an explicit encoding. Given that the Linux
box is OK, it looks like the app should be explicitly using UTF-8
everywhere.
Based on a response I got on the Mid
On 24/08/2016 17:43, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen of the Tomcat and Midrange-Java communities:
>
> We're having a weird problem with character encoding in a Tomcat webapp.
>
> We've added an interface to GMail to our webapp, and we've got, just for
> our own development, test
On 24/08/2016 17:56, Toews, Timothy wrote:
> Hello all:
>
> I am new to this list as of half an hour ago. I am concurrently searching the
> archives for a potential solution to the error message I have included below.
> This error happens on a daily basis for our office, attempting to login to a
On 24/08/2016 20:24, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> On 8/24/16, 11:48 AM, Jason D. Burkert wrote:
>
>> Try running \bin\version.bat on the Tomcat in question and examining
>> 'Architecture' field.
>
> "version.bat"?? I don't see any "version.bat" anywhere.
>
> The Windows box in question, BTW, is
On 8/24/16, 11:48 AM, Jason D. Burkert wrote:
Try running \bin\version.bat on the Tomcat in question and examining
'Architecture' field.
"version.bat"?? I don't see any "version.bat" anywhere.
The Windows box in question, BTW, is a Pentium 4, running Windows Server
2003, and Tomcat is runnin
On 2016-08-24 2:23 PM, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
The box in question currently has 7.0.47. I'm not sure whether it's
32-bit or 64-bit; I'm pretty sure it is set up for OpenSSL security,
rather than JSSE.
At
https://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.67/bin/
I see
apache-tomcat-7.6
Thanks for the response Chris.
> Second now that the new attribute entry was supposedly picked up, how
> do I confirm it is now 300 seconds? I don't see that attribute in the
> default server status page.
> What default server status page?
I'm referring to the server status page at hostname:po
The box in question currently has 7.0.47. I'm not sure whether it's
32-bit or 64-bit; I'm pretty sure it is set up for OpenSSL security,
rather than JSSE.
At
https://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.67/bin/
I see
apache-tomcat-7.67-windows-i64.zip,
apache-tomcat-7.67-windows-x64.
Hello all:
I am new to this list as of half an hour ago. I am concurrently searching the
archives for a potential solution to the error message I have included below.
This error happens on a daily basis for our office, attempting to login to a
server where we store files that document our site
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Tomcat and Midrange-Java communities:
We're having a weird problem with character encoding in a Tomcat webapp.
We've added an interface to GMail to our webapp, and we've got, just for
our own development, testing, and production use, instances of that
webapp running
I'm receiving the following errors when shutting down tomcat7 and it may be a
clue to my software that runs on tomcat. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance,
Aug 24, 2016 12:34:12 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina stopServer
SEVERE: Could not contact localhost:8005. Tomcat may not be runn
On 24/08/2016 09:45, D, Dwarakesh wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> I am getting the below error while trying to run one of the application built
> and running on java1.8. In order to support below tomcat version and java8,
> do I need to upgrade any jars of Tomcat later version?
Yes, you need to update
On 24/08/2016 07:43, Aritz Maeztu wrote:
> I've already posted the issue in StackOverflow:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/39096941/does-tomcats-el-stream-api-make-sense
>
> Using Tomcat 8.0.30, I've implemented some EL accesses to the stream
> API. However, I've found that this expression:
>
Add your application jars to catalina.properties file
tomcat.util.scan.DefaultJarScanner.jarsToSkip section.
Regards,
Chandra
From: D, Dwarakesh
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 2:15:45 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Getting Invalid byte tag in const
Hello Team,
I am getting the below error while trying to run one of the application built
and running on java1.8. In order to support below tomcat version and java8, do
I need to upgrade any jars of Tomcat later version?
Please let me know.
Below are the details:
Java version --> jdk1.8.0_45
T
21 matches
Mail list logo
