Syed,
On 8/9/2016 10:08 PM, Syed Mudassir Ahmed wrote:
> I am using Log4j in my web app to write the logs to a separate file.
> Surprisingly, that log file is not at all getting created. I run
> the logger logic as a standalone application and the log file indeed
> gets created. I am assuming t
I am using Log4j in my web app to write the logs to a separate file.
Surprisingly, that log file is not at all getting created. I run the
logger logic as a standalone application and the log file indeed gets
created. I am assuming tomcat is not allowing me to write my logs to a
file. It is simpl
Dear Team,
I have upgraded the groovy jar from 1.5 to 2.3.3 in order to support Java 8.
When running my application I am getting the below error and I have tried using
the below possible solutions as well. But still getting the same error with
different possible solutions.
Can some one help me
Sean,
On 8/9/2016 1:55 PM, Sean Son wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Mark Eggers
> wrote:
>
>> Sean,
>>
>> On 8/8/2016 7:10 AM, Sean Son wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Mark Eggers
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 8/5/2016 2:19 PM, Sean Son wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Mark Eggers
wrote:
> Sean,
>
> On 8/8/2016 7:10 AM, Sean Son wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Mark Eggers
>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/5/2016 2:19 PM, Sean Son wrote:
> >>> Hello!
> >>>
> >>> I am currently running Tomcat 8 on RHEL 7.2 with one web applic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David,
On 8/2/16 4:04 PM, KARR, DAVID wrote:
> I'm attempting to use Tomcat(tomee) to run a REST service that will
> return some data from some SQL queries (Oracle). I've installed
> Tomee 7.0.1, which uses Tomcat 8.5.3.
>
> The JDBC driver is av
Am 09.08.2016 um 19:48 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 09/08/2016 18:29, Stefan Mayr wrote:
Hi,
two colleagues came with an idea that our new java platform should only
run signed code. In the java world I've only seen signed java applets.
From a bit of internet research it looks like any JAR, WAR or EA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Joshua,
On 8/3/16 6:51 PM, Joshua McDowell wrote:
> [W]hy aren’t you fronting Tomcat with Apache? I am asking because
> i am curious of others views.
Because it's an unnecessary component, sensitive to other
environmental factors.
Why *are* you f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Roy,
On 8/3/16 10:03 AM, Roy Leonardus wrote:
> i'm using the EasyMock to test the creation of the BasicDataSource
> :
>
> BasicDataSource ds = prepareDataSource(); //set the properties of
> the basic data source Connection connection = ds.getConne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
XMing,
On 8/3/16 4:50 AM, XMing wrote:
> I've add the following line to setenv.sh in tomcat bin directory.
>
> export CATALINA_OPTS="$CATALINA_OPTS -Djava.awt.headless=true"
This shouldn't usually be necessary. What happens if you don't set
"head
On 09/08/2016 18:29, Stefan Mayr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> two colleagues came with an idea that our new java platform should only
> run signed code. In the java world I've only seen signed java applets.
> From a bit of internet research it looks like any JAR, WAR or EAR can be
> signed with jarsigner (may
Hi,
two colleagues came with an idea that our new java platform should only
run signed code. In the java world I've only seen signed java applets.
From a bit of internet research it looks like any JAR, WAR or EAR can
be signed with jarsigner (maybe all zip files?).
Some sources indicate that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
James,
On 8/9/16 12:36 PM, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> On 8/9/16, 9:25 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> There /is/ a POODLE variation which is against TLS 1.0 - 1.2 [1].
>> If SSLv3 is completely disabled (TLS1.0 is okay), then you
>> aren't vulne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David,
On 8/4/16 9:19 PM, David Kerber wrote:
> On 8/4/2016 3:18 AM, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> Dear Christopher,
>>
>>
>> Thanks you very much for your response !!
>>
>>
>>> Filesystem quota?
>>
>> Filesystem Quota is not enabled for this disk part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Daniel,
On 8/5/16 10:47 AM, Daniel Savard wrote:
> To me, it appears as false problem. I don't see why the change to
> the permissions on the log file is so critical for the security.
> You can simply set appropriately the permissions on the directo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Konstantin,
On 8/6/16 7:35 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> That is the build date. Release date is several days late
> (2016-06-20) and can be seen
>
> - at the front page of http://tomcat.apache.org/ - in the change
> log of 7.0.71 (in svn repos
On 8/9/16, 9:25 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
There /is/ a POODLE variation which is against TLS 1.0 - 1.2 [1]. If
SSLv3 is completely disabled (TLS1.0 is okay), then you aren't
vulnerable to "classic" POODLE. If you aren't using CBC-based cipher
suites with TLS1.0 - TLS1.2, then you should be o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Lazar,
On 8/9/16 8:40 AM, Lazar Kirchev wrote:
> Hello! When handling requests which make use of request dispatcher,
> Tomcat 7.0.70 allocates more memory in comparison to 7.0.69. This
> seems to come from the encoding of the path introduced with th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
James,
On 8/8/16 2:31 PM, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> Hmm. This is interesting.
>
> pentest-tools.com says that neither our server nor the customer
> server is vulnerable to POODLE.
>
> But Site24x7.com says ours IS vulnerable to POODLE. Then (wh
Hello!
When handling requests which make use of request dispatcher, Tomcat 7.0.70
allocates more memory in comparison to 7.0.69. This seems to come from the
encoding of the path introduced with this change
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/org/
apache/catalina/core/ApplicationC
On 09.08.2016 12:10, Clemens Fuchs wrote:
Hi,
Actually I was referring to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6265#section-5.2.3,
which explicitly states, that a leading . in the domain attribute value should
be ignored by the user-agent.
This implied for me, that a leading . is allowed. You're rig
Hi,
Actually I was referring to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6265#section-5.2.3,
which explicitly states, that a leading . in the domain attribute value should
be ignored by the user-agent.
This implied for me, that a leading . is allowed. You're right with other
specs, like https://tools.iet
2016-08-09 10:52 GMT+02:00 Andrea Galli :
> Thank you Christoph , but in this how-to there isn't any example for SQL
> Server.
This is my configuration (context.xml) for a SQL Server connection pool
You need a SQL Server JDBC driver
>
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Christoph Nenning [m
On 09.08.2016 10:52, Andrea Galli wrote:
Thank you Christoph , but in this how-to there isn't any example for SQL
Server.
Well, no. But did you expect someone else to do all the work for you ?
These are your options :
1) considering that SQL Server is a proprietary product of Microsoft, contac
Thank you Christoph , but in this how-to there isn't any example for SQL
Server.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Christoph Nenning [mailto:christoph.nenn...@lex-com.net]
Inviato: martedì 2 agosto 2016 09:44
A: Tomcat Users List
Oggetto: Re: jdbc check available database
> Hello guys,
>
> I’ve
On 09.08.2016 09:48, Jayaram Ponnusamy wrote:
Thanks André,
Kindly please find my answer below:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:02 AM, André Warnier (tomcat)
wrote:
On 08.08.2016 11:18, Jayaram Ponnusamy wrote:
Thanks André,
1. ANS-Question 1 = Both Tomcat & WebServer installed on different
Mach
Thanks for your willingness to help.
I'm using Tomcat 8.0
>Why and how are you trying to "compile" it?
I choose Servers->Tomcat 8.0 server as localhost-config->Run
Now I'm playing with the configuration and I've got a bunch of new error
messages. The day ahead is going to be full of fun [😉]
__
Thanks André,
Kindly please find my answer below:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:02 AM, André Warnier (tomcat)
wrote:
> On 08.08.2016 11:18, Jayaram Ponnusamy wrote:
>
>> Thanks André,
>>
>> 1. ANS-Question 1 = Both Tomcat & WebServer installed on different
>> Machines, Attached Architecture diagram
28 matches
Mail list logo