Wesley Acheson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:56 PM, André Warnier wrote:
and can someone finally explain what "spwaning child processes" means ?
What are you all doing to these kids ?
I apologise about the typo and I deliberately didn't want to use the
term Threads as I was unsure if thre
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:56 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> and can someone finally explain what "spwaning child processes" means ?
> What are you all doing to these kids ?
>
I apologise about the typo and I deliberately didn't want to use the
term Threads as I was unsure if threads should be used.
and can someone finally explain what "spwaning child processes" means ?
What are you all doing to these kids ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
On 8/23/2010 11:02 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
>> Subject: Re: How to spwan child processes.
>>
>> Thats my point I thought new Thread() was something I couldn't
>> do (by JEE specs)
Yeah don't get too hopeful. I'm not that familiar with the tomcat
code, however I think it works.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Scott Hamilton
wrote:
> Awesome dude (that you submitted the patch so quick - I've not looked at
> it in detail yet). Thanks!
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
Can you also include the dump of the thread that is holding the lock? In other
words, what's the other half of the deadlock?
-Original Message-
From: Milo Meerkat [mailto:milo.meer...@gmx.com]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 10:53 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat 6.0.29 - de
Awesome dude (that you submitted the patch so quick - I've not looked at
it in detail yet). Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 2:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Is there a better way to disable JSESSION
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49811
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/08/2010 16:29, Wesley Acheson wrote:
>> Sorry for bring this off list. I'll put it back on list if you think that
>> appropriate.
>>
>> You think that the context is the correct pl
> From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: How to spwan child processes.
>
> Sorry I don't even know where the specs live. I thought I saw it on
> sun some time ago but can't find it.
I usually search by JSR number.
> If I've offended you in some way then I'm sorry.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
>> Subject: Re: How to spwan child processes.
>>
>> "Certain J2EE/JEE applications (for instance those running in EJB and
>> Web containers) must not spawn new threads; instead al
> From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: How to spwan child processes.
>
> "Certain J2EE/JEE applications (for instance those running in EJB and
> Web containers) must not spawn new threads; instead all work should be
> performed on the main application threads manag
Hello Chris and Konstantin,
thanks for all your suggestions - we finally tracked down the issue,
and it turns out the root cause here was a flawed deployment process.
In order to preserve the application's context.xml file during
software upgrades, our service engineers stop Tomcat, then remove t
Hey all,
Can someone point me to a sample config file showing a simple two node tomcat 6
cluster communicating via TCP not using multicast at all? I'm having trouble
finding detailed documentation on this subject. I searched the archives but
didn't see much.
Thank you!
Thanks a lot for your help, it works properly now !! (I added
address="0.0.0.0" in the server.xml)
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: Sébastien PRUNIER [mailto:sebastien.prun...@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: java.net.ConnectException
> -Original Message-
> From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 10:34 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: java.net.ConnectException when attempting to open URL via
> Java code
>
> > From: Sébastien PRUNIER [mailto:sebastien.prun
> From: Caldarale, Charles R
> Subject: RE: java.net.ConnectException when attempting to open URL via
> Java code
>
> It means Tomcat is listening on IPv6, but not IPv4. I don't know why
> this happens, but you can change your conf/server.xml to add an
> address="0.0.0.0" attribute to the port 80
> From: Sébastien PRUNIER [mailto:sebastien.prun...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: java.net.ConnectException when attempting to open URL via
> Java code
>
> When I run netstat -a, I can see the following line :
> ...
> TCP[::1]:8080 PC-d-CE:64433 TIME_WAIT
> ...
> What does i
> From: Sébastien PRUNIER [mailto:sebastien.prun...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: java.net.ConnectException when attempting to open URL via
> Java code
>
> 3) if it was the zip version, to which directory did you install it ?
> -> C:\developpement\tomcat\apache-tomcat-5.5.30
>
> 4) how do you start i
When I run netstat -a, I can see the following line :
...
TCP[::1]:8080 PC-d-CE:64433 TIME_WAIT
...
What does it mean ?
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Sébastien PRUNIER <
sebastien.prun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A)
> 1) you downloaded and installed Tomcat 5.5.28, from
A)
1) you downloaded and installed Tomcat 5.5.28, from the Tomcat website at
http://tomcat.apache.org
-> YES
2) which one of the Tomcat packages did you download and install ? the zip
version, or the installer .exe version ?
-> ZIP version
3) to which directory did you install it ?
-> C:\developp
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
>> Subject: Re: How to spwan child processes.
>>
>> Thats my point I thought new Thread() was something I couldn't
>> do (by JEE specs)
>
> I'm curious - where in any of the Java
Charles... in his defense (though I'm not saying he shouldn't understand
the spec), this actually stems from a series of misunderstandings,
mostly brought on by "poser" authors, "grad and teach" college
"professors", and instructors who regurgitate slides rather than
actually knowing anything. Man
> From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: How to spwan child processes.
>
> Thats my point I thought new Thread() was something I couldn't
> do (by JEE specs)
I'm curious - where in any of the Java EE specs did you come across that?
> Questions:
> 1 Should this be
Sébastien PRUNIER wrote:
JVM version : 1.6.0_20
Platform : Windows VISTA Pro / SP2
Does netstat show Tomcat listening on port 8080 : YES
Is localhost resolvable from inside the JVM ? : YES. Moreover, the same
error occurs with the IP address or the hostname instead of localhost.
What's in the
Hi,
Setup:
- Debian GNU/Linux
- Java 1.6.0_21-b06
- Tomcat http://www.coderanch.com/forums/f-56/Tomcat 6.0.29
I got the error below when upgrading tomcat 5.5.29 to tomcat 6.0.29.
When we upgraded we noticed that tomcat 6 does not like if we have a xerces
implementation in each webapp in
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Ronald Klop wrote:
> class OtherAppNotifier implements Runnable {
> public void run() {
> ... doe something...
> }
> }
>
> In your servlet:
>
> doGet() {
> processUserRequest();
> new Thread(new OtherAppNotifier()).start();
> }
>
Thats my point I though
class OtherAppNotifier implements Runnable {
public void run() {
... doe something...
}
}
In your servlet:
doGet() {
processUserRequest();
new Thread(new OtherAppNotifier()).start();
}
You can also use java.util.TimerTask or some other threadpool thing if this
spawns too many t
Hi,
As far as I'm aware your not supposed to extend Thread in JEE. I've
seen similar questions on Stack Overflow where it was suggested you
may use your containers Thread pool. This sounds like a terrible idea
for portability.
So take the following example.
1 A request for something specific is
JVM version : 1.6.0_20
Platform : Windows VISTA Pro / SP2
Does netstat show Tomcat listening on port 8080 : YES
Is localhost resolvable from inside the JVM ? : YES. Moreover, the same
error occurs with the IP address or the hostname instead of localhost.
What's in the Tomcat logs when you enabl
> From: Sébastien PRUNIER [mailto:sebastien.prun...@gmail.com]
> Subject: java.net.ConnectException when attempting to open URL via Java
> code
>
> The following piece of code generates a "java.net.ConnectException:
> Connection refused: connect" error :
>
> URL url = new URL("http://localhost:80
The following piece of code generates a "java.net.ConnectException: Connection
refused: connect" error :
URL url = new URL("http://localhost:8080/myapp/mypage.jsp";);
url.openStream();
It crashes with Tomcat 5.5.30 but it works with Tomcat 5.5.28.
The Tomcat server is started and the HTTP link w
Yawar Khan wrote:
Felix, the issue still persists, i dont know what else to do? and i dont know
why this issue is popping up on linux enviroment only. under windows there is no
session mixup issue.
Now this are no class wide variables and i had moved them inside the login
function.
Hi.
Thi
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:56:31 -0700 (PDT), Yawar Khan
wrote:
> Felix, the issue still persists, i dont know what else to do? and i dont
> know
> why this issue is popping up on linux enviroment only. under windows
there
> is no
> session mixup issue.
Well, you have fixed one problem in your code,
Felix, the issue still persists, i dont know what else to do? and i dont know
why this issue is popping up on linux enviroment only. under windows there is
no
session mixup issue.
Now this are no class wide variables and i had moved them inside the login
function.
_
I'm using FORM authentication, and everything seems to be working
(logins are accepted, etc), except when there was an error the URL
changes in the users browser to point to j_security_check. The
contents of the redirect to j_security_check contains login.html, so
the user is able to login as expe
35 matches
Mail list logo
