Travis Taggart wrote:
Here is the error I am getting in my log file *>
[Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() failed errno = 61
All the threads in the Tomcat are busy.
Increase the maxThreads for AJP/1.3 connector in server.xml
Regards,
Mladen.
-
Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
Hi,
I observe in mod_jk's log errors:
[error] ajp_get_reply::jk_ajp_common.c (1566): (ajp13w) Tomcat is down
or refused connection. No response has been sent to the client (yet)
All those error messages are 'normal' :)
Increase connectionTimeout to
> From: Cartman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat SSL configure for only one application.
>
> Hi, I want to configure my tomcat server for use ssl
> but I have some applicatións working on this server
> and I don't want that all application work with ssl,
> just only one will work
I am trying to integrate a web application to an external service, and
need to be able to take an incoming sessionId from the external service
server, and to return details from the session to which that sessionId
applies.
I understand that there was a getSession(String sessionid) method, in
Htt
I am yet another barking up that tree.
--- "Propes, Barry L [GCG-NAOT]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if you find out, please let me know...I'm barking up
> that tree, too.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 4:50 PM
Yes, different webapps within the same host.
On 2/9/07, Hassan Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/9/07, Cartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I want to configure my tomcat server for use ssl but I have some
> applicatións working on this server and I don't want that all
application
>
Hi,
We tried updating it once but we have problem in load balancing and we went
back to original mod_jk which we working fine. We upgraded to 1.2.15, but we
are planing to try out new one 1.2.20, but I am watching this discussion
board and there issues even in 1.2.20 and I have posted because of
On 2/9/07, Cartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I want to configure my tomcat server for use ssl but I have some
applicatións working on this server and I don't want that all application
work with ssl, just only one will work with ssl support. How do I do that?
Are you talking about differe
You should tell us, which versions and platform you are using, and also
your config. I guess you are running on Windows. 61 relates to Winsock
error 10061, which is connection refused. So it's likely host and port
of your worker do not match ip and port of your tomcat server.
Also your logs lo
Version 1.2.6 of mod_jk is an antiquity. First update before
investigating the problem.
babu wrote:
Hi,
We are also facing same problem and we are using mod_jk 1.2.6 with apache
2.0.53 and tomcat 5.0.27. Mod_jk is configured with loadbalancer. We have
Apache+mod_jk with LB + 9 tomcats in back
Hi, I want to configure my tomcat server for use ssl but I have some
applicatións working on this server and I don't want that all application
work with ssl, just only one will work with ssl support. How do I do that?
Thanks.
--
Gracias.
Atentamente,
Carlos Arturo Trujillo Silva
Ingeniero de Si
Hello,
We have this capability in our open source identity and access management
solution where you can use more then one use more then one repository for
authentication. You may be able to use just the authentication service as
taking on the rest of it may be more then what you need. The project
Sure, I will let you know. Perhaps we need third party tools. Doese someone
knows a solution?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-Windows-Authentication-against-multiple-domains-tf3203321.html#a8895171
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
if you find out, please let me know...I'm barking up that tree, too.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 4:50 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Windows Authentication against multiple domains
Hi,
I am having a tomca
Hi,
I am having a tomcat webapplication and logon needs to be done via
windows-authentication (ldap). I configured authentication against ldap,
that works fine for one domain. The problem is, that we are having users in
multiple domains. Is there a way to configure authentication against the
whol
Hi,
I am also running with same problem, Please let me know if any settings have
helped to solve this problem.
With regards,
Babulal Satasiya
Cisco System Inc.
Sanjose, CA
JNeuhoff wrote:
>
>> Do I remember correctly, that Apache and Tomcat are on the same machine?
>> Is there a firewall on
I've been working on migrating an application from Resin to
Tomcat-5.5.17 and have one particular JSP and bean that's got me stumped.
When using jsp:setProperty property="*", I get the following exception
and stack trace:
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: jsp.error.beans.property.conversio
Here is the error I am getting in my log file *>
[Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect()
failed errno = 61
[Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (196)]: In
jk_endpoint_t::connect_to_tomcat, failed errno = 61
[Fri Feb 09 15:45:41 2007] [jk_ajp13_work
Hi,
We are also facing same problem and we are using mod_jk 1.2.6 with apache
2.0.53 and tomcat 5.0.27. Mod_jk is configured with loadbalancer. We have
Apache+mod_jk with LB + 9 tomcats in backend. Mod_jk is set with sticky bit
set.
Partial workers.properites
worker.list=loadbalancer
worker.lo
I assume you are talking about the hotfix
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931311/en-us , I am going to ask our
sysadmins to get this hotfix, too. Thanks for sharing your experience with
us on this forum.
J.Neuhoff
RChartier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using Apache 2.0.59 and Tomcat 5.0.28 with m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bryan,
Rainer Jung wrote:
> So where's the deadlock in this stack dump?
Yeah... there are no interesting threads in there. Did you post the
wrong thread dump?
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using Gnu
Upon reflection my team has decided that it is some
strange interaction between Firefox and our VMware
instance running Tomcat. If we kill Firefox, then Tomcat
resumes processing requests. How bizarre.
Sorry to waste the bandwidth.
-Bryan
-
This message has been marked as Off-Topic with [OT] , so that it doesn't stand
in the way of the main thread.
Here's where one can report a bug : http://tomcat.apache.org/bugreport.html
(unless it hasn't been reported already).
-Rashmi
- Original Message
From: David Wall <[EMAIL PROT
I hope all this 'bot' talk doesn't prevent a resolution to the bug
long-standing bug regarding sessions that never terminate, long after
they should have expired. All of our web apps have a background thread
that periodically terminates sessions that haven't been accessed in 24
hours, even tho
while that's difficult to read, let me see if I interpreted correctly.
While loading a webpage from the localhost URL the javascript file included in
that web page does not fully load, and in the middle of loading, hangs or
crashes? And then you open the page in Internet Explorer it reads done?
ok, thanks FooShyn.
-Original Message-
From: Foo Shyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:36 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connection Pool configuration
Hi,
I'm not sure bout Tomcat 4.0, but i think in 4.1 u could do it through the
admin page.
Just cre
So where's the deadlock in this stack dump?
Bryan Basham wrote:
Hi all,
This might not be the right forum for this. Let em know if
I should post this to the tomcat-dev alias.
THE PROBLEM
The problem we are experience is that occasionally Tomcat (5.5.20)
is deadlocking; see the attached outpu
Hi all,
This might not be the right forum for this. Let em know if
I should post this to the tomcat-dev alias.
THE PROBLEM
The problem we are experience is that occasionally Tomcat (5.5.20)
is deadlocking; see the attached output from a kill -3 on the tomcat
process.
Has anyone seen this happ
Rashmi Rubdi wrote:
So since bots are HTTP/1.1 capable that might explain why I don't see
jsessionid appended to the jsp pages in the access logs.
...and the cookie is only recorded when the client sends it, not when
the server sets it, so it doesn't appear in the log.
-Rashmi
- Orig
Thanks for explaining, I looked at some of the access log archives where I used
the %{Cookie}i in the pattern, and for the bots it shows as "-", but for
browser access it shows the cookie information.
See the "_" at the end of this is the cookie information from Googlebot
127.0.0.1 - [11/Sep/200
| From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Friday, 09 February, 2007 06:30
|
| Pardon the bad math in the faq since 64*2!=256 ;)
Obviously you were thinking "64 << 2" -- happens to everybody... ;)
-
-
Hi,
I am using Apache 2.0.59 and Tomcat 5.0.28 with mod_jk 1.2.20 on Windows
2003 SP1 but the system have some issue on the socket layer. In fact, after
some time, some users are able to crash our architecture: apache answers to
request such as *.html but mod_jk says it cannot connect to tomcat.
Hi,
I am using Apache 2.0.59 and Tomcat 5.0.28 with mod_jk 1.2.20 on Windows
2003 SP1 but the system have some issue on the socket layer. In fact, after
some time, some users are able to crash our architecture: apache answers to
request such as *.html but mod_jk says it cannot connect to tomcat.
http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/memory.html
"If you have a lot of servlets or JSP's, you may need to increase your
permanent generation. By default, it is 64MB. Doubling it to be
-XX:MaxPermSize=256m might be a good start."
Pardon the bad math in the faq since 64*2!=256 ;)
-Tim
Nikola Milutin
Rashmi Rubdi wrote:
I'm sorry that I didn't express myself in a clear manner. I was simply saying that the jsessionid doesn't appear when bots access pages that have sessions in them (in my case), but I'm not concerned with it as it doesn't affect anything.
I worked it out after i'd had a coffe
Has anybody successfully managed to run Apache 2.0.59 and Tomcat 5.5.17 on
Windows 2003 on a real production server, and not just as a test system?
We are still experiencing frequent TCP Connections Aborted errors (err=53)
for no apparent reasons, and because of that our live server becomes
unres
36 matches
Mail list logo
