I assume you are talking about the hotfix
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931311/en-us , I am going to ask our
sysadmins to get this hotfix, too. Thanks for sharing your experience with
us on this forum.

J.Neuhoff



RChartier wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am using Apache 2.0.59 and Tomcat 5.0.28 with mod_jk 1.2.20 on Windows
> 2003 SP1 but the system have some issue on the socket layer. In fact,
> after some time, some users are able to crash our architecture: apache
> answers to request such as *.html but mod_jk says it cannot connect to
> tomcat. Even a restart of services doesn't change anythink. Tomcat is
> running and answer for simple "hello world" jsp pages but cannot answer to
> /manage/html.
> 
> I patch windows with KB 931311 and it seems to work properly.
> 
> 
> JNeuhoff wrote:
>> 
>> Has anybody successfully managed to run Apache 2.0.59 and Tomcat 5.5.17
>> on Windows 2003 on a real production server, and not just as a test
>> system?
>> 
>> We are still experiencing frequent TCP Connections Aborted errors
>> (err=53) for no apparent reasons, and because of that our live server
>> becomes unresponsive to clients  and we end up re-booting our server
>> machine once or twice a week.
>> 
>> (see http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-replacement--tf3050993.html for more
>> details)
>> 
>> This problem even occurs with firewall and anti-virus software all
>> switched off.
>> 
>> Rainer Jung suggested to try out a Microsoft Hotfix
>> (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925513) which we are still waiting for
>> to receive from Microsoft Technet, and once its there, we will try it
>> out.
>> 
>> J.Neuhoff
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Anybody-using-Apache-2.0.59-and-Tomcat-5.5.17-on-Windows-2003-tf3200025.html#a8891871
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to