Sorry if this question is a bit basic, but I'm having a hard time wrapping my
head around a few concepts with IOC and how it works in general and with Tap
specifically.
Basically, I get held up with simple stuff like creating a new Entity
instance for an object (like a Hotel Reservation) that belo
This has not so much to do with IOC as more with settting up your database
and business logic and tie them together.
If you have a logged in user, i assume you'll have some database record of
this user ? Then the user will have a unique key (most likely an id).
Now when creating a hotel booking y
I urge anyone considering using XSLT to STOP and take a look at freemarker.
Freemarker has excellent support for XML inputs
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/xgui_imperative_learn.html including
XPath
You can push java objects into the freemarker context including config and
helper classes.
Where did you read about fields injection not being thread safe? It's
definitely not true. Some developers like to use constructor injection because
of better testing etc. personally I'm using mostly field injection.
Setter injection is just not implemented, IMHO IOC should support method
injec
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:47:18 -0300, fmaylinch
wrote:
Thank you Thiago,
:)
I think I can also wrap those 3 services inside a "facade" service so
there is only one injected service in each child and not 3.
But I wonder whether there is a solution with less code repetition and
where I can
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 06:01:32 -0300, Ferran Maylinch
wrote:
Hello,
Hi!
is not thread-safe so constructor injection or build* methods are the
recommended ways.
I wonder why Tapestry does not allow setter injection and thread-safe
@Inject if build* methods are already thread-safe (aren't the
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 06:39:49 -0300, Lance Java
wrote:
I urge anyone considering using XSLT to STOP and take a look at
freemarker.
I like FreeMarker too. The best standalone templating engine I've used.
Way better than Velocity.
If I go for a job interview and find out that they use XSL
Mr Diplomatic Thiago...you just poured a bucket of cold water over a nice fresh
flame war :)
On 20/03/2012, at 10:40 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 06:39:49 -0300, Lance Java
> wrote:
>
>> I urge anyone considering using XSLT to STOP and take a look at freemar
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:42:14 -0300, Chris Mylonas
wrote:
Mr Diplomatic Thiago...you just poured a bucket of cold water over a
nice fresh flame war :)
Sorry, Lance, my flame war detector failed to detect it in this thread.
Sorry for the inconvenience. :P Funny enough, I work for a company
> Actually, XSLT makes sense when the source document is XML already.
I disagree, both freemarker and XSLT need to parse the XML input into some
form of DOM object before applying a transformation to it. Do you agree
that XSLT templates are far more verbose than Freemarker templates?
> Sorry, La
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:28:39 -0300, Lance Java
wrote:
Actually, XSLT makes sense when the source document is XML already.
I disagree, both freemarker and XSLT need to parse the XML input into
some form of DOM object before applying a transformation to it. Do you
agree
that XSLT templat
Denis Stepanov-2 wrote
>
> Where did you read about fields injection not being thread safe? It's
> definitely not true. Some developers like to use constructor injection
> because of better testing etc. personally I'm using mostly field
> injection.
>
Here:
http://tapestry.apache.org/defining-
Sorry for the off topic conversation but I can't resist :)
> On the other hand, I'm not sure it has support for XPath selectors in the
FreeMarker declarative XML processing, which is usually the best approach
for more complex XML structures.
Freemarker supports XPath selectors... see here
http://
I forgot to say that I'm using tapestry 5.3.2 running on tomcat 6, and the
exceptions happens which users who use Firefox 3...
--
David Germán Canteros
2012/3/20 David Canteros
> Hi guys!
> Lately I detected a lot of this excepti
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:55:43 -0300, Lance Java
wrote:
Sorry for the off topic conversation but I can't resist :)
Me neither . . . And don't forget that I actually like FreeMarker very
much. :)
On the other hand, I'm not sure it has support for XPath selectors in
the
FreeMarker decla
Hi all,
In order to reduce users' install difficulty, after discussion with
Igor, we decide to supply Eclipse Marketplace support as well as
individual update center once this XML editor based lightweight
TapestryTools get stable release version. I have updated my project
proposal already[1].
Aft
I don't know whether this has come up before or already is in the planning.
Something that I'd find
useful would be if opening a component class automatically also opened the
component template and
you'd have something similar to the tabs at the bottom of the XML editor window
where you can swit
Hi Uli,
I know what is your mean, you would like a multi-tab editor with both
Java class tab and .tml tab. This is a good solution to switch between
Tapestry's page/component class file and .tml tempate file.
But in my current plan, we would like to supply another solution, it
will also supply co
I'm always up for a good flame war.
I do admit XSLT is an acquired taste.
In my particular case things like Freemarker are not versatile enough. My
first problem is only part of my project is Java so I need something that
does not require Java. For better or worse I can use XSLT in Cobol on a
mai
Thanks for your help Lance, I'm sure it could work that way.
I am a bit suprised that there is no direct solution to this. It's
common to have some libraries or default CSS and override them on
specific pages / layouts.
Making CSS special cases or writing an own MarkupRendererFilter for an
issue t
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:51:05 -0300, trsvax wrote:
In my particular case things like Freemarker are not versatile enough. My
first problem is only part of my project is Java so I need something that
does not require Java. For better or worse I can use XSLT in Cobol on a
mainframe. Next I send/re
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:52:11 -0300, Beat Durrer wrote:
Thanks for your help Lance, I'm sure it could work that way.
I am a bit suprised that there is no direct solution to this. It's
common to have some libraries or default CSS and override them on
specific pages / layouts.
Tapestry already
Calling setAcessible on the same field from different threads is not
thread-safe, but it's a special case, don't be affraid to use field injection.
Denis
Mar 20, 2012 v 1:49 PM, fmaylinch:
>
> Denis Stepanov-2 wrote
>>
>> Where did you read about fields injection not being thread safe? It's
>
I am the author of that fix and it definitely works correctly.
It strips out the form from the request and redirects it to the page that the
client was actually looking for.
On Mar 20, 2012, at 9:04 AM, David Canteros wrote:
> Hi guys!
> Lately I detected a lot of this exception in the logs of my
For each component, Tapestry includes the stylesheets and javascript for
each making sure to only include each unique file once. I'm not 100% but I
guess that the order in which the components appear in the page probably
defines the order in which they appear in the page.
What would be nice is if
I saw that in your proposal and I'd also keep the shortcut. In fact the
shortcut could be used to
switch between the tabs. But opening the class and the template in the same
window would emphasis
that they belong together and in most cases they are also edited together. It's
just an additional
i
I did some tests and the order of the stylesheets is actually reversed
to what I expected it to be...
Here is an example:
Let's say we define a RootLayout, which has all the basics (
tag, meta stuff, the tag).
Then we have a SimpleLayout which uses the RootLayout but adds a top
navigation to it
Agree with your point :-)
Last year, i built an Eclipse WTP based TapestryTools, i think i have
finished much features, it may be powerful and welcome, but it has not
many users at last. I am some kind of disappoint.
After discuss with Igor, we thought we should change the way, give up
much *heav
I agree that tapestry could be a bit smarter when components/layouts extend
each other. This improvement could be made without adding a priority/order
to the @Import annotation. I think this is worthy of a Jira issue.
As I mentioned before, adding a priority/order to the @Import annotation
could h
Right, well I understand that. In fact that is how I would do it
traditionally in a J2EE environment but my understanding is that some of
this should be done auto-magically with the Tapestry/Hibernate combination.
So for example, let's say we have a game application where a User can start
a game a
Yeah, you're probably right about the priority having it's own issues.
I wonder if there is a case, in which the current ordering (reversed
to my needs) is actually required?
In my opinion the innermost element is the most specific one and
therefore should have the last word (and be the last one to
I have a hunch that the reverse order that you are seeing is a direct
result of tapestry's RenderQueueImpl which iterates tail first.
Perhaps you could write a MarkupRendererFilter that gets the "html/head"
element and loops through all of the "link" elements calling moveToTop() on
each (thus reve
Since T5 still can't predict the future (pfff!), you need to set the
reference to the user yourself :)
There are several ways to do this...
So, all your CreateGame page needs is the user - right?
Then let's add an page activation context:
@Property
private Game game;
private User user;
onActivat
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:37:26 -0300, Lance Java
wrote:
Perhaps you could write a MarkupRendererFilter that gets the "html/head"
element and loops through all of the "link" elements calling moveToTop()
on each (thus reversing the order).
You could do that in a mixin added to the root layout
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Beat Durrer wrote:
> Since T5 still can't predict the future (pfff!), you need to set the
> reference to the user yourself :)
> There are several ways to do this...
> So, all your CreateGame page needs is the user - right?
> Then let's add an page activation contex
Hi,
I wish to raise an event from a component and abort further processing
if true is returned from any event handlers - only I don't know how!
ComponentResources.triggerEvent() returns true if *any* event handler
was invoked, regardless of what it returns.
Passing a ComponentEventCallback doesn
36 matches
Mail list logo
