Wow, that's cool. I was expecting you to say "when it's ready ..." :)
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
I'm not sure. My most reliable ognl tester had the nerve to go on
some kind
of "honeymoon" this week so the lack of reported issues may be a false
positive. ...I think I really need to get this out the d
I'm not sure. My most reliable ognl tester had the nerve to go on some kind
of "honeymoon" this week so the lack of reported issues may be a false
positive. ...I think I really need to get this out the door now-ish though,
so I think we'll do it next week.
Just need to upgrade dojo to 0.4.3 this
:O
OK .. thanks
When is 4.1.2 expected to have a production ready release?
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
That ~is~ what happens in 4.1.2. ..so.Maybe you should just try that
out.
On 5/21/07, Paul Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, so the strategy seems primed for a fairly limited approach;
e
That ~is~ what happens in 4.1.2. ..so.Maybe you should just try that
out.
On 5/21/07, Paul Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, so the strategy seems primed for a fairly limited approach;
everything under web-inf or root. Why not also look under folders named
the same as the package name
OK, so the strategy seems primed for a fairly limited approach;
everything under web-inf or root. Why not also look under folders named
the same as the package name (minus the value of
'org.apache.tapestry.page-class-packages') ? This is done in the root,
so wouldn't it be just as simple to als
This should work, except you have to have at least a minimal .page file in
WEB-INF as well.
On 5/14/07, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There has been extensive work done recently in this specific area for
4.1.2.
I still think I need to add at least one or two additional configuration
There has been extensive work done recently in this specific area for 4.1.2.
I still think I need to add at least one or two additional configuration
options in the .application file to make unrelated sub-directory structures
in the web context easily configurable but things should generally work
I'm using tapestry 4.1
Paul Stanton wrote:
Hi,
Here's how I would like to organise my templates:
* security of storing my html files under web-inf
* organisation of subdirectories
* no page specifications
So my desired structure is:
name: "Page1" and "module/Page2"
template: "WEB-INF/Page1.ht
Hi,
Here's how I would like to organise my templates:
* security of storing my html files under web-inf
* organisation of subdirectories
* no page specifications
So my desired structure is:
name: "Page1" and "module/Page2"
template: "WEB-INF/Page1.html" and "WEB-INF/module/Page2.html"
java: "co
