I'm not sure. My most reliable ognl tester had the nerve to go on some kind of "honeymoon" this week so the lack of reported issues may be a false positive. ...I think I really need to get this out the door now-ish though, so I think we'll do it next week.
Just need to upgrade dojo to 0.4.3 this weekend. On 5/21/07, Paul Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:O OK .. thanks When is 4.1.2 expected to have a production ready release? Jesse Kuhnert wrote: > That ~is~ what happens in 4.1.2. ..so.....Maybe you should just try that > out. > > On 5/21/07, Paul Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> OK, so the strategy seems primed for a fairly limited approach; >> everything under web-inf or root. Why not also look under folders named >> the same as the package name (minus the value of >> 'org.apache.tapestry.page-class-packages') ? This is done in the root, >> so wouldn't it be just as simple to also do this under web-inf? >> >> ie >> >> class : com.pages.module.MyPage >> html: WEB-INF/module/MyPage.html >> >> that should 'just work' imho. >> >> Currently I have a stack of .page files with no content what so ever. It >> is annoying. >> >> Jesse Kuhnert wrote: >> > There has been extensive work done recently in this specific area for >> > 4.1.2. >> > I still think I need to add at least one or two additional >> configuration >> > options in the .application file to make unrelated sub-directory >> > structures >> > in the web context easily configurable but things should generally >> > work as >> > well as they possibly can right now. (though I was thinking of trying >> to >> > add in some "guessing" sort of strategy for things but this will >> > require a >> > lot of thought to get right ) >> > >> > On 5/14/07, Paul Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> I'm using tapestry 4.1 >> >> >> >> Paul Stanton wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > Here's how I would like to organise my templates: >> >> > >> >> > * security of storing my html files under web-inf >> >> > * organisation of subdirectories >> >> > * no page specifications >> >> > >> >> > So my desired structure is: >> >> > name: "Page1" and "module/Page2" >> >> > template: "WEB-INF/Page1.html" and "WEB-INF/module/Page2.html" >> >> > java: "com.pages.Page1.java" and "com.pages.module.Page2.java" >> >> > >> >> > However, I find the only way for tapestry to find my template if >> it's >> >> > under a module directory and has no .page specification is to store >> it >> >> > outside of WEB-INF, which is not desirable. >> >> > >> >> > Is this expected behaviour in 4.1 or have I missed something? >> >> > >> >> > If it is expected, is there an intended resolution for later >> versions? >> >> > >> >> > Thanks. >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
