sure that @Property anotated members can be protected???
i don't believe.
can anybody confirm?
Am 07.08.2014 um 16:38 schrieb Muhammad Gelbana:
> I would have 2 private properties for each class with different names. Or
> have one protected member variable in the parent class.
>
> *-
I would have 2 private properties for each class with different names. Or
have one protected member variable in the parent class.
*-*
*Muhammad Gelbana*
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mgelbana
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 5:05 PM, D.R. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am facing an issue while upgr
Hi,
i am facing an issue while upgrading T5.2.6 to 5.3.7 when a Pageclass
(or component) extends.
In the superclass, a have a @Property called "asdf" and the subclass has
also that @Property called "asdf".
Both are "private" and it worked without problems in 5.2.6
With 5.3.7 i get:
[ERROR] ioc.
