I would have 2 private properties for each class with different names. Or have one protected member variable in the parent class.
*---------------------* *Muhammad Gelbana* http://www.linkedin.com/in/mgelbana On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 5:05 PM, D.R. <d.re...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > i am facing an issue while upgrading T5.2.6 to 5.3.7 when a Pageclass > (or component) extends. > > In the superclass, a have a @Property called "asdf" and the subclass has > also that @Property called "asdf". > > Both are "private" and it worked without problems in 5.2.6 > > With 5.3.7 i get: > [ERROR] ioc.Registry Unable to create new accessor method public > com.pipapo.Bsdf getAsdf() on class com.pipapo.Csdf as the method is > already implemente d. > > I checked the release notes, but it does not seem, that "protected" is > now allowed for @Property anotated variables. > > Why did this behaviour has changed? > > What is the best practise to deal with that issue? > > > Kind regards > David > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
