t; > > On 8/22/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> Because TestNG is better ;)
> > > >>
> > > >> On 8/21/06, xVik <[
use TestNG is better ;)
> > >>
> > >> On 8/21/06, xVik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Yesterday i reed a last post on Howars's blog ab
on Howars's blog about tapestry
testing
> >> > and i
> >> > wonder why he choose tastNG not JUnit?
> >> > --
> >> > View this message in context:
> >> > http://www.nabble.com/Why-Howard-choose-testNG-in-tapestry-
> test-module-tf214
OTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Yesterday i reed a last post on Howars's blog about tapestry testing
> >> > and i
> >> > wonder why he choose tastNG not JUnit?
> >> > --
gt;> > and i
>> > wonder why he choose tastNG not JUnit?
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> > http://www.nabble.com/Why-Howard-choose-testNG-in-tapestry-test-module-tf2144189.html#a5919185
>> > Sent from the Tapestry - User forum at Nab
wars's blog about tapestry testing and i
> wonder why he choose tastNG not JUnit?
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://www.nabble.com/Why-Howard-choose-testNG-in-tapestry-test-module-tf2144189.html#a5919185
> Sen
> Yesterday i reed a last post on Howars's blog about tapestry testing and
>> i
>> wonder why he choose tastNG not JUnit?
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Why-Howard-choose-testNG-in-tapestry-test-module-tf214
Because TestNG is better ;)
On 8/21/06, xVik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yesterday i reed a last post on Howars's blog about tapestry testing and i
wonder why he choose tastNG not JUnit?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Why-Howard-choose-testNG-in-tapestry-
Yesterday i reed a last post on Howars's blog about tapestry testing and i
wonder why he choose tastNG not JUnit?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Why-Howard-choose-testNG-in-tapestry-test-module-tf2144189.html#a5919185
Sent from the Tapestry - User forum at Nabbl