On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:37:54 -0300, Blower, Andy
wrote:
Why more feasible in 5.2? We're using 5.1.0.5, and are now too close to
release to upgrade. I was hoping to move to 5.2 when I thought it would
be released in H1 2010, but we'll need to stick with 5.1 now I think. We
launch in Augus
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Blower, Andy
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:hls...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 29 June 2010 18:20
>> To: Tapestry users
>> Subject: Re: Tapestry using 1.3Gb of heap space after capacity testing
>&
> -Original Message-
> From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:hls...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 29 June 2010 18:20
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: Tapestry using 1.3Gb of heap space after capacity testing
>
> It may be time to return to a more radical idea, one that is more
&
ipse MAT,
> http://lh6.ggpht.com/_YwJn8TJTqJU/TCoNT11ouZI/ACI/G8eTGsth4zM/HeapDominators.png
> >>
> >> Anyone think I'm on the right track, or barking up the wrong tree
> completely?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Andy
>
>
>
> Anyone think I'm on the right track, or barking up the wrong tree completely?
Here's a completely obscure question out of left field. Are you launching the
JVM with -server?
Here's a pretty useful blog post:
http://jfarcand.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/putting-glassfish-v3-in-production
om/_YwJn8TJTqJU/TCoNT11ouZI/AAAAACI/G8eTGsth4zM/HeapDominators.png
>>
>> Anyone think I'm on the right track, or barking up the wrong tree completely?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Blower, Andy [ma
tors using Eclipse MAT,
> http://lh6.ggpht.com/_YwJn8TJTqJU/TCoNT11ouZI/ACI/G8eTGsth4zM/HeapDominators.png
>
> Anyone think I'm on the right track, or barking up the wrong tree
> completely?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
>
> > -Original Message-
> &g
e instance seems to get
>> 11,283 ComponentPageElementImpl instances created for it. I'm finding
>> it hard to find a good view of the tree to figure out what component(s)
>> are the main culprits for this huge number of instances.
>>
>> Thanks for any help or guid
wrong tree completely?
Thanks,
Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Blower, Andy [mailto:andy.blo...@proquest.co.uk]
> Sent: 20 April 2010 17:42
> To: 'Tapestry users'
> Subject: RE: Tapestry using 1.3Gb of heap space after capacity testing
>
> Thanks for the link. A
Message -
From: "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo"
To: "Tapestry users"
Sent: Tuesday, 20 April, 2010 19:47:08 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, Bucharest,
Istanbul
Subject: Re: Tapestry using 1.3Gb of heap space after capacity testing
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:41:37 -0300, Blower, Andy
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:41:37 -0300, Blower, Andy
wrote:
It looks like explicit repeated use of a component, rather than using a
single component in a loop, creates a lot more component objects in the
heap.
Every or is exactly one component, regardless of
being inside a loop or not. W
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: Tapestry using 1.3Gb of heap space after capacity testing
>
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:41:25 -0300, Blower, Andy
> wrote:
>
> > Uber-component anti-pattern, not to my knowledge, but we have a lot
> of
> > pages and components now.
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:41:25 -0300, Blower, Andy
wrote:
Uber-component anti-pattern, not to my knowledge, but we have a lot of
pages and components now. And a lot of logic in them. The project's
large enough I can't be sure. Do you have a handy link to Howard's
description so I can get m
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:16:11 -0300, Blower, Andy
wrote:
We've been doing some capacity testing recently, and I'm concerned about
the amount of heap memory that doesn't get freed when all the sessions
expire. I'm seeing 1.3Gb after being left with no use overnight.
It seems you have huge
We've been doing some capacity testing recently, and I'm concerned about the
amount of heap memory that doesn't get freed when all the sessions expire. I'm
seeing 1.3Gb after being left with no use overnight. I dumped the heap and took
a look at what was using this much memory with the YourKit p
15 matches
Mail list logo
