Re: Tapestry and Article at Theserverside.com

2008-02-04 Thread Filip S. Adamsen
Filip S. Adamsen: +1 (non-binding) ;) Ulrich Stärk skrev: -- /| /| | | ||__|| | Don't feed | / O O\__

Re: Tapestry and Article at Theserverside.com

2008-02-01 Thread Emmanuel Sowah
On Feb 1, 2008 12:27 PM, Robin Helgelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 1, 2008 12:14 PM, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, I don't know if they are great committers, else they could have > chosen > > the challenging path of making each major Tapestry realease fully > backwar

Re: Tapestry and Article at Theserverside.com

2008-02-01 Thread Emmanuel Sowah
That Hibernate 3 isn't backward compatible with 2 is not true. That package naming issues is a minor one you could easily fix yourself. But the issues that hinder one from smooth migration from T4 to T5 is enormous and is an almost impossible task to achieve for less genius people. It needs a true

Re: Tapestry and Article at Theserverside.com

2008-02-01 Thread Thiago HP
On 2/1/08, Robin Helgelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not going to feed that troll on that one, but what's the problem? T4 > and T5 live happily together where T4 still is maintained. And Emmanuel is not even a good troll. He praised Gavin King for implementing a backward-compatible framework,

Re: Tapestry and Article at Theserverside.com

2008-02-01 Thread Robin Helgelin
On Feb 1, 2008 12:14 PM, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I don't know if they are great committers, else they could have chosen > the challenging path of making each major Tapestry realease fully backward > compatible. They rather choose the easy and trivial path of rewriting from

Re: Tapestry and Article at Theserverside.com

2008-02-01 Thread Emmanuel Sowah
On Feb 1, 2008 11:51 AM, Robin Helgelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 1, 2008 11:46 AM, Davor Hrg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > tapestry has a good community, and an active mailing list... > > I'm not worried ... > > Don't forget we have Howard, Jesse and few other great committers. :) We

Re: Tapestry and Article at Theserverside.com

2008-02-01 Thread Ulrich Stärk
-- /| /| | | ||__|| | Don't feed | / O O\__ | / \the trol

Re: Tapestry and Article at Theserverside.com

2008-02-01 Thread Robin Helgelin
On Feb 1, 2008 11:46 AM, Davor Hrg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tapestry has a good community, and an active mailing list... > I'm not worried ... Don't forget we have Howard, Jesse and few other great committers. :) -- regards, Robin

Re: Tapestry and Article at Theserverside.com

2008-02-01 Thread Davor Hrg
There are many frameworks... you should use which one suits your need the best... tapestry has a good community, and an active mailing list... I'm not worried ... Davor Hrg On Feb 1, 2008 11:05 AM, Joachim Van der Auwera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tapestyr users have so much fun using the fra

Re: Tapestry and Article at Theserverside.com

2008-02-01 Thread Joachim Van der Auwera
Tapestyr users have so much fun using the framework that "we" don't have time to evangelize. Joachim Emmanuel Sowah wrote: Hi Tapestry afficianados, There is a new article at theserverside.com written by Carlos Perez entitled "Top five Java Technologies to learn in 2008". Regarding the hype o

Tapestry and Article at Theserverside.com

2008-02-01 Thread Emmanuel Sowah
Hi Tapestry afficianados, There is a new article at theserverside.com written by Carlos Perez entitled "Top five Java Technologies to learn in 2008". Regarding the hype on Tapestry 5 and it's "innovative" label Howard has assigned it, I couldn't see it on the list. Also, the discussions on this ar